Do you think Charlie Kirk was a master debater?

[Anonymous]

[Danzigdawson]

No, he sucked. He wasn't a debater: he was a showman. His trick was to attack, attack, attack relentlessly, hoping to intimidate the other debater; make them lose their cool. He was good at giving the impression that he was a good debater.

However, I've watched him debate knowledgeable people and more seasoned students: never did he manage to build a logical and intelligent argument. When he would inevitably fail, he would just utter stupid platitudes such as "well, we'll have to agree to disagree", as if this meant that he didn't come out of the debate looking like a complete moron.

He debated with freshman college students on purpose and took advantage of their stage fright, their (still) immature knowledge or their lack of skill to debate in public.

He was a cunt. Fuck him. I don't like the fact that he's been murdered, but good fucking riddance.

[Zack-Bann]

A debater can hold a position that isn’t his own for the sake of winning the debate itself.


Charlie was just a man with strong convictions that he believed in and just defended over and over.


Plus it doesn’t take debate skills to argue positions backed by common sense.

[strateguy632]

better than debating. kirk came prepared. he was informative. those who disagreed had no good reason. kinda like juan on the 5. just describing utopia or things that did not happen.

[strateguy632]

i will add: he was good at master debating!

[Anonymous]

he never had to be. The political "left's" favorite thing to attack about him was that he "used beginner and simple debating strategy". Charlie wanted people to understand his message, where the political left seeks to convolute, distort, cover, and hide what they really are saying. So, using "pro debating tactics" to confuse and push a blatant lie through, disguised as a misunderstood truth, is what the leftists are proud of. 🤡

[OneViewpoint]

I think Charlie Kirk was a con man willing to do anything to make money. Hence I view his death as a good thing.

[DonaldDarko]

Good enough they felt they had to shoot him. Not many get to that point. He's not even a politician he buit his influence out of his wits.

[exitseven]

He was okay but he used to debate liberals and they are for the most part living in a world separated from reality

[Miristheiss]

He was one of the best debaters I have seen.

[jshm2]

LOL, master or debater are two things Charlie was never able to touch, let alone be.

[FrodoSkywalker007]

@jshm2 does it offend you to. be surrounded by arguments that make sense and are based in logic and fact.
I know it goes against islamist ideology.
Sorry it hurts your feelings 🙁

[msc545]

No, I think he was an annoying propagandist.

[Agape93]

Nope. Good? Absolutely. Master? No.

[TonyMetal___1986]

Me = Master ☻

[Agape93]

Bater

[TonyMetal___1986]

What a naughty witch you are 🤣
Every person is a master bater, but i'm a master too 😌

[Agape93]

Master prison pocket inspector

[TonyMetal___1986]

You're really naughty aren't you 🤦🏻‍♂️

[Agape93]

Says the bater

[TonyMetal___1986]

Says the bater to the real naughty master bater 🤣

[loveslongnails]

No, but he was a mastur - bator.

[Alex-Snow]

I have never heard of the guy

[Cidknee]

Good enough to be silenced.

[canamlusciouslad73]

He was an MF !!!

[ellllltr]

Nope

[TonyMetal___1986]

Yes he was

[FrodoSkywalker007]

Yes for sure