Is Your Opinion Of Charlie Kirk Positive, Negative, Or Neutral?

[Physics-Man]

Positive

Negative

Neutral

[Knightwatch27]

Largely positive. I agree with most of what he says and I respect his wit and ability to debate. He is clear on what he believes and is proven to be very learned despite lacking formal education (or because he lacks it as he would say). I really like how he ventures to campuses and exposes the complete ignorance, intolerance and inability to reason that exists among young adults of PC culture today and how strong indoctrination is. He's also refreshingly patriotic loving the US as the "best nation on earth" which I as a patriot myself of course disagree with, but I do not begrudge him his sentiment and I think there needs to be more of that in the US.

[OlderAndWiser]

Very positive. He is bright and articulate, and he does not engage in emotional attacks on people who challenge him.

[OlderAndWiser]

Thanks for MHO!

[KostasKouvalis]

It was positive, but it became negative after I saw how contradictory and irrational he is. He called out a black student for supporting black only dorms, when I know damn well, if he was forced to live either with blacks or Whites, he would live with Whites. But then a few weeks later, he was arguing with a Mexican that diversity isn't a good thing😂

He was also arguing with a girl who claimed we're not a true democracy because it's the minority and not the majority voice that matters. He claimed it's not like that, when that's EXACTLY how it is.
The videos appear to have been taken down.

He's an idiot. I might still respect him though if he was consistent, but he's not.

[genericname85]

he's a moron who can shine debating undergrad collage kids on. and even in that he sometimes fails miserably. i don't even disagree with all that he says. it's just every time he's debating people, he's like a broken record of try hard gotcha rhetorics. he never even listens to what the other person says. it doesn't seem to matter for his talking point script.

like you can see all he does is clip farming for his audience that won't listen to a full debate. and he still manages to keep the gestures of "winning the debate" while losing on pretty much all accounts but his crowd won't notice cause the points of the other person are going right above their heads anyway so he gets away with it.

[genericname85]

it's almost like you can't have a conservative without them being a deluded christian. that's the annoying part to me.

[AviatorTom]

He's an intelligent guy. I don't agree with everything he says but overall he has a good view of people and the world.

[DonaldDarko]

Generally positive but he's a little to main stream. Mark Dice is more my speed.

[exitseven]

It is hard not to think that he is riding this wave of popularity to make a quick buck/

[Anonymous]

Reluctantly positive. He's generally right but some of his arguments are so completely ridiculous. Like one time he was debating a black guy and pretended like he never noticed he was black. Like you know the dude is black.

[Anonymous]

generally positive given how much shit he has to put up with

[SixFootSexy]

Another Stephen Crowder talking head that always has the back of Trump and others who couldn't give less of a **** about him and his pandering.

[Dongie]

Positive. He's smart and honest. He should run for president one day.

[seeyounexttuesday]

He was instrumental in de programming a bunch of young people.

[avery58]

Negative. He's a grifter. Plus his smile is really creepy, apart from his shit personality.

[Anonymous]

He makes uneducated people who spend four years in college look like absolute clowns. Pure entertainment.

[Dongie]

He does so effortlessly!

[Zylos]

He vocally supports the mass murder of innocent people.

I hope karma finds him.

[Dongie]

No, he does NOT!

[Zylos]

@Dongie Yes he does.

[Dongie]

I think you connect dots that really aren't there to be able to say that. He may not have much respect for a certain group that are among the worst on the planet but I'm certain he doesn't want people murdered. He is not like you with cold-blooded intentions in his heart.

[Zylos]

@Dongie If he doesn't want people murdered, why is he supporting Israel, which has murdered 17,000 Palestinian children over the past two years?

[Dongie]

On October 7th, almost 2 years ago, Palestinians dropped from the sky murdering Israeli citizens like mad fiends! They kidnapped and raped and torched people as fast as they could. Then, retreating back to Gaza, land given them by the Israelis, they placed Palestinian children in direct paths of the sure to come bombs in response to the vicious attack! They shouldn't stop until all of Hamas, who are the same as Palestinians, are finished!

I'm pretty sure you already know these facts, but the difference is you hate the Jews of Israel. So you decideded that the hamas terrorists had a right to do what they did on the 7th. And you don't care that the children of Israel were murdered.

[Zylos]

@Dongie In 2008, Israel (a country built in the 20th century by Jews who ethnically cleansed the Arab tribes living there) invaded Gaza and killed 1166 Palestinians (low estimate).

In 2014, Israel invaded Gaza and killed 2125 Palestinians (low estimate).

Since October 7th, 2023, Israel has killed 61,805 Palestinians in Gaza.

Yet idiots like yoursel still believe Israel are the good guys.

[Dongie]

Let's take these one at a time. Not that it matters to one filled with hate who already has every Jew targeted.
Established in 48 the day following were they not attacked by 5 surrounding countries? When did they find time for "ethnic cleansing"?

[Dongie]

Just one thing you left out bitch! How many Israeli children have the Arabs killed since 1948? Add to it the number of adults killed. ALL STSRTED BY THE ARABS IN GAZA. THERE IS NO PALESTINE. ITS A NAME COONED BY ROMANS IN THE FIRST FUCKING CENTURY WHEN THE JEWS WERE SCATTERED AMONG THE NATIONS!

[Dongie]

*started
*coined

[Zylos]

@Dongie Yeah, your whole victim spiel is not gonna work with me. I'll save my sympathy for actual victims of antisemitism, not Israel-supporters.

The conflict did not start in 1948 or 2023...

[Dongie]

It started when Sarah put Ismail and Hagar out! About 4 thousand years ago. But if you recall Isaac remained close to his half brother.

[Zylos]

@Dongie I do not recall because I do not give a flying fuck what happened 4,000 years ago.

[Dongie]

It figures. Coming from the Bible I'm sure you think the Jews distorted the truth.

[Zylos]

@Dongie I just don't find it relevant today.

[Dongie]

But you know enough to blame Israel 100%. You're more stupid than they are.

[Zylos]

@Dongie My country helped the Jews escape the Nazi occupiers, yet Jews are now getting my countrymen arrested and imprisoned for supporting the Palestinians.

Israel can go fuck itself.

[Dongie]

What country would that be?

[Shiprex]

Bit of a knob who has too much Jezus freak going on.

[Ariesman81]

The Masterdebater? He's doing out here doing God's work.

[DrPepper12]

Even the plants wouldn't mind if he stopped contributing the only thing he ever has to this planet - CO2

[DCVsMarvel2]

controversy, creates, cash- eric bischoff. frmer manager of wcw

[RavVid]

Broadly positive. He is a good debater.

[qwerty2469]

Im a conservative. He is an antichrist supporting cuck of Israel. I call him Charlie Kike

[Dongie]

How clever conservative.

[qwerty2469]

I know. Its a little above your room temperature IQ commie

[Dongie]

Eeek, wrong STOOPID! Two O's!

[qwerty2469]

Yeah thats what I said. Your IQ is 2 zeros

[Dongie]

200!

[qwerty2469]

00 we tod it. Borderline black

[Dongie]

Eeh, yeah, whatever...

[qwerty2469]

Typical response of admitting defeat

[Dongie]

Defeat? At the hands of a craven charlatan? For you to call Charlie Kirk anything other than sir is a gross boorish move on your part. It totally gives you up as the lying miscreant of the gutter from which you slithered. The same under curb dwelling to which you'll return.

[LiftingFencer]

His eyes are too close together and he has a glass chin. He ain't to short but his phenotype is cuck, and he has it on full throttle.

[MisterWack]

Neutral.
I don’t pay attention to him.

[Twalli]

You see him changing the direction of his answer if he can't answer successfully

[Dongie]

That's a lie!

[Twalli]

@Dongie I can find clips if you want. I just saw one a few minutes ago. Not on his channel, of course, but on another one.

[Dongie]

Yeah, Twalli, maybe you better. He is a sharp speaker and I've never seen him flounder, stall, or stutter a lick.

[Twalli]

@Dongie it isn't really like that. I'll give you an example from the thing he failed to answer most recently. He asked a guy to define a woman. Obviously the guy defined it without biological sex. As the discussion went on the guy asked Kirk to explain how to define God as the father. In other words, define a man. He was unable to do it and kept saying that he (Kirk) was a man and recgonized as such.
He's a good speaker most of the time and all of his videos are a reflection of that. However, we never see a full thing. He only publishes the ones that make him look good, or better. If someone was able to beat him with a question, the only way it's seen by most of us is if someone else posts it online.

[Dongie]

Wow! I guess you can be the one to follow him around and catch that elusive flubber-gubbin and post it online. After all, as you say, it shouldn't take many appearances to catch him in one.

[Twalli]

@Dongie i don't go to things he is at and I don't post videos online. He has a brand and anything that makes him look bad will tarnish it. So he promotes that he always answers in such a way that the leftist who asks the question is cowed. That doesn't always happen, because it's impossible. He just won't show that.
I knew him online when he was still in highschool. He didn't know how to deflect as well then and it was easier to catch him. Granted, he wasn't talking, so it was harder to do.

[Dongie]

I saw a liberal pour a vanilla milkshake on his head back in 17. Very nice huh!

[Sal_Monella]

Generally positive.

[Anonymous]

The guy's a douchebag overall but he does make a few valid points on rare occasions

[Dongie]

What's your idea of a douche bag?

[zagor]

Never heard of him.

[Anonymous]

I don't know who he is.

[beefcakebradybatson]

KUCK FIRK !!!