Why can women date purely in their own interests, yet call wealthy conservatives selfish for voting in theirs and refusing to fund strangers?

Why the hell should Elon Musk, or any other wealthy conservative, be treated like some kind of human cash machine just because other people have children they can’t afford to support? Why is he automatically branded greedy, heartless, or evil for voting against policies that take more of his money and give it to people he has never met? What exactly is he supposed to get out of that arrangement?
People suddenly become obsessed with “selfishness” when somebody votes according to their own financial interests. Yet in dating, self-interest is treated as completely normal. A woman can reject a man because he earns less, is shorter, less attractive, less successful, or simply doesn’t meet her standards, and everyone rushes to say, “She doesn’t owe him anything.” Fair enough. She doesn’t.
But then apply that exact logic somewhere else and people lose their minds. If nobody owes another person a relationship, attention, attraction, or a better standard of living through dating, why is a wealthy person supposedly morally obligated to sacrifice his own financial interests for strangers?
You can’t spend years telling people, “Nobody owes you anything,” and then suddenly change the rule to, “Actually, rich people owe everybody else their money.” Either acting in your own interests is acceptable or it isn’t. You don’t get to celebrate ruthless personal choice when it benefits you and then condemn somebody else for making a political or financial choice that benefits them.
Why can women date purely in their own interests, yet call wealthy conservatives selfish for voting in theirs and refusing to fund strangers?
Post Opinion