Women only want to date/fuck rich, high-status men and just use other men for resources. Agree?

[Anonymous]

Stronly agree

Agree

Slightly agree

Slightly disagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Not sure

[redeyemindtricks]

Money is NOT a sexual attractant. It doesn't make women wet.
Although it's shockingly easy to trick rich boys into **thinking** that it does, for women who are so inclined.

Also... Dude! are you sure you typed this question correctly?
Because the rich dudes ARE the ones that most women will just "use for resources" -- ESPECIALLY if they're stupid enough to flaunt their wealth as a means of attracting women (which is just asking for it... I mean, come ON).

cdn.meme.am/.../dumb-blonde-obvi.jpg

Lol I mean... Close yr eyes and imagine the kind of boy that a woman can't stop wanting to FUCK, even though she's getting little else from that relationship (which probably doesn't even deserve to be called a relationship).
Do you imagine... a rich boy?
Ahahahahahha fuck no.
You almost certainly imagine EXACTLY the opposite -- you imagine a boy who not only ISN'T rich, but who gets away with using that woman for sex AND for "borrowing" money and stuff that he'll never ever pay back.

Like duh.

[jacquesvol]

Flaunting money certainly attracts a special kind of women.

[redeyemindtricks]

@jacquesvol Right? 😂 And then there's such screeching to high heavens about how the boy has been "wronged", if she goes after his wealth when the relationsihp ends.

It's weird how many boys fail to realize this basic commonsense fact:
If they try to attract women with wealth... they'll attract women who are attracted to wealth.
How hard is this to understand? Lol.

[kelvinmed]

You're back and taking down dumbasses 😊

[redeyemindtricks]

@kelvinmed ahah <3

[SuperGlitterGirl]

That's not true at all. I am a strong feminist and I have absolutely no need for a man to provide for me. I can get along just, thank you! The only thing I expect from him is to invite me out to nice restaurants and pay for dinner, but that is because I want him to show me that he appreciates me and because it is romantic! I strongly believe in equality for women. Women should have at least twice as much equality than men! And just because I can take half of his assets away and have him pay me alimony when we get divorced does not mean I did not care about our marriage. All things have to end some time and if it happens that I get compensated for the efforts I invested then so be it!

[KingRamesses]

You must be joking because that is not true equality.

[ItsAMeWeirdo]

That is true but with a certain type of people called assholes. There is also guys that are cheaters there called assholes too. But guys can also
be gold diggers but there rare. Not sure about women being cheaters though with the home rare thing it might be common. But let's be honest we're all assholes. Women use there bodies for shit and I seen it, not all women, but I seen it. Guys can be nice just to have sex with you, not all guys, but seen it happen. The point is, we can't generalize everyone

[Bandit74]

Disagree.

I think women care about wealth only when they want someone to buy a house and raise kids with. Or maybe if they just want to experience a bit of the luxurious lifestyle, eat at a fancy restraunt, or go to a cool party. Point is they are only interested in sleeping with those guys if they are benefiting from their wealth in some way. They wouldn't sleep with those guys just for the sex. (unless he's really hot & rich).

However for sexual attraction, I would say looks matter waaaay more than money. There are guys who aren't wealthy yet are still able to concistently get women to spread their legs for them without having to commit to them or even spend a penny on them. Those are the guys women are most attracted to and its mostly about looks. Being tall, having a muscular body, and a symmetric masculine face. Having a deep voice doesn't hut either.

[redeyemindtricks]

"Those are the guys women are most attracted to and its mostly about looks."

^^ except it isn't.

This sort of thing is "about looks" ONLY inasmuch as 1/ the boy meets or exceeds a certain minimum threshold of attractiveness AND 2/ the rest of his personality/vibe/approach comports with his looks.

More specifically

1/ I mean, ok, yeah, a boy's gotta be at least somewhat hot, to make casual sex happen.
Before you complain about this... please do keep in mind that /a/ in the other direction, looks are the no. 1 criterion for EVERYTHING -- flings, relationships, you name it -- so, like, yeah... AND /b/ there's that whole primal sense of *risk* that's UNAVOIDABLE in a casual sex situation (imagine that the average woman is 1.5 times yr size and 2-3 times as strong as you -- and 50-100 times as likely to be physically coercive or violent. Now think about how circumspect you'd be in picking sex partners -- or at least how fucking hot she'd have to be for you to do it anyway mahah).

ANd

[redeyemindtricks]

2/ I mean... yeah, the pieces of the puzzle have to fit.

If everything about a boy's looks and comportment suggest that he's the "not gna wait, fuck or he's gone" type -- like, he looks like Rambo, he's impatient with everyone and everything, and he's charismatic and persuasive -- then, it'd be INCREDIBLY CREEPY if he DIDN'T go all-out for casual sex right away. If that kind of boy wanted to "be friends first", that'd be scary as fuck. like serial killer level of scary, dude.

Whereas, if some typically passive-aggressive skinny hipster boy was super sexually forward -- that would ALSO be creepy. Because it doesn't fit everything else about who he is and what he does.

That's a HUGE part of this. It's not so much just "choosing on looks" -- it's being creeped the fuck out by anyone whose conduct doesn't SUIT their looks.
This is a thing with boys, too (imagine how you'd react to a woman who "dresses slutty" -- let's not start with that phrase, but, you get me -- but who turns out

[redeyemindtricks]

to be incredibly prudish. Especially if she also has a potty mouth and is constantly dropping sexual innuendo everywhere.)
The only reason it's not **as common** for boys to be creeped out, in this way, is because women are much much less likely to TRY rlly hard to be someone they aren't, in an effort to "impress" whomever.

__

But, yes, you are spot-on about how $$$ is not a sexual attractant.

You might even be significantly underestimating. (On balance -- based on experiences of my girlfriends, and also male friends, and other randoms whose stories I've been privy to -- the richer a boy is, the LESS sexually uninhibited a woman will be with him, unless she's being materially spoiled in a way that outstrips anything she could possibly hope to achieve through her own hard work.
This is even true with prostitutes, I mean, consider how many $200-500/hr craigslist/backpage hookers don't have any realistic chance of getting more than $15-20/hr at a normal job.)

[Bandit74]

@redeyemindtricks

I still think women care more.
Even if a girl is average looking she can still get casual sex really easily and with guys who are more attractive than she is. There aren't many hot girls who go around sleeping with average looking men. At least not to the same extent that hot guys are willing to casually fuck average girls.

And the only reason why women seem to care less about looks for a relationship is because you care more about money and generally want someone who earns more than you. And if a woman happens to marry a man who earns less money than she does, then he is usually equally hot or hotter than she is.

And I don't think men hold looks as the number one criteria for friendships. Sure they might be more likely to befriend an attractive woman, but I don't think anyone holds that as a requirement.

[Bandit74]

If the being scared of the size difference argument was true, then wouldn't women feel safer hooking up with shy, skinny guys? But thats not what happens. They are more inclined to hookup with tall muscular guys with agressive personalities, bassically the guys who are the MOST capable of physically hurting them.

Your whole personality must match the appearance argument just boils down to what I said. The conventionally hot and masculine guys can successfully pursue sex right away without commitment while other guys have to wait for it make a commitment first.

and to be honest I wouldn't be "creeped out" by that scenario, just disappointed.

[redeyemindtricks]

"If the being scared of the size difference argument was true, then wouldn't women feel safer hooking up with shy, skinny guys? But thats not what happens."

^^ Yeah -- and if there were more than vanishingly few women who were into being dominant sexual aggressors, then, you'd see more of that.

Dude, 99% of guys could kill 99% of women with tehir bare hands, were they sufficiently motivated. So, "more able to hurt them" is not as much of a thing as you're making it out to be.

[AleDeEurope]

Wouldn't it be better to use rich/high status men for their resources, and just fuck the others? I mean, rich men will have more resources than the rest, why just fuck him? Hmmm your logic seems flawed :/

[PurpleTeardrops2]

I don't understand these types of questions. I hate how some men become mad that the woman they're interested in won't date them becuz his ass isn't up to her standards.

Then the same fool gets mad at the man with resources and financial stability because he's not on the same level as he is.

Instead of getting mad at the women for setting standards, why not get your finances up instead of getting mad and bitching about what a "nice guy" you are. Lmao, pathetic

[amphet11]

You are making women sound like prostitutes, needing resources and financial stability from a man before dating and sleeping with him, which is exactly prostitution.

I do however see a flaw in the askers question, as surely if women were after resources, they would go after the rich high status men, but he says they use the opposite for resources.

[Indian-African]

So much for being a "strong independent woman" huh?

[up_here]

I like guys that work for what they want at any scale in the money scale. In my case it will be the drive to better up more that any material thing they could posses. Is more of the values of people than anything else. The wallet doesn't give you understanding, doesn't give compassion, doesn't give love. Is perhaps money for a nice date but then what?

[PrincessPie]

I Slightly agreed... because SOME women will only date those type of men..
i personally would feel intimidated by one i prefer to be with people on similar levels to me :)

[fauchelevent]

Damn, I wonder what resources I'm using my broke, low status student boyfriend for.

[Coconutpie]

😂😂😂😂😂

[Coconutpie]

I was thinking the same about all the guys I dated.

[sodaslut]

bish, i dont even care how they look like. i dont need money, i dont need a good body, what i want is affection, loyalty and trust :-) yes ofc u have to be financially stable, but like y'know... be able to take care of yourself at least

[amphet11]

If you need him to be financially stable, but you don't care about looks, how can you even be considered heterosexual

[sodaslut]

no. what i meant was i didn't want a lazy bum

[amphet11]

... because you want him to provide financial stability. Either way, I am saying if you don't care about how a guy looks and his body (gender specific traits) how can you be considered straight.

[gypsophila]

how do you use the poor, low born guy for resources? sheesh.

I feel like that statement isn't representative of reality.

[ThatLeaf]

Disagree. I haven't had much in my life and I don't need much. My partners love and affection pays off more than any amount of money ever could.

[hehpangender]

That's honestly terrible. What a shitty way to play the guy

[reixun]

We wanna fuck/date hot guys but we're pressured to go for "stable" "older" guys who are less passionate. Lover vs provider.

[Mr_President]

they whore around when there young and then when theu realize there looks are going down they settle for the resource guy. sometimes

[Anonymous]

For fucks sake the population of the Earth clearly doesn't reflect this. Why does this keep getting asked? How stupid can one be?

[Anonymous]

I can't say some women/girls are like this. that's what you call a gold digger if they do this. I for one am not like this.

[oldoldold]

well if thier choices are do that or fuck you.

I think I understand

[StickStickity13]

Why wouldn't they get resources from the rich men who have more of it?

[peachblossomluck]

I've never done this.

[PowerPrincess]

Jealous that we can and you can't?

[CuteMonsterrr]

i wouldn't date or fuck someone cuz of his money

[datgirl]

Just stfu. Seriously.

[Anonymous]

Men only want 10 women agree?
That as stupid.

[angrycupcake]

True dat

[KingRamesses]

How many times does this shit get asked?

[Indian-African]

As much as questions from angry women demanding that men must accept them and not be shallow.