Do you believe political violence is ever justified?

[Dargil]

Take the poll.

Yes. (When and whom?)

Never

Something else.

[Grond21]

I'm not sure what the definition is, but if it is any violence taken under a political banner, then our revolutionary war would count as political violence. And I think that was a just war. Therefore, under certain conditions political violence is justified.

[Dargil]

Think about the difference between war and local political violence.

[Grond21]

Thinking about it

[Billlewis]

The only reason why the left -- and it's always the left -- resorts to violence is because they know they can't win a debate on the issues.

[Agape93]

Yeap. When you take away someone's rights or put their safety at risk, and when you remove or ignore safe and legal means of protest or resistance, you get what's coming to you

[lilBigPotato]

Nope. Violence in general is only acceptable for defence in my opinion.

[purplepoppy]

No and I would extend that to include intimidation tactics.

[888theGreat]

No and MAGA dude that attacked protestor at Texas rally should have been arrested for assault.

[Dargil]

You are boring the living crap out of me. Good for constipation.

[Anonymous]

Never, Republicans were wrong to attack the capitol.

[Dargil]

But then there's Antifa, BLM, SPLC, and the Floyd rioting, the Seattle rioting., Watts rioting, Chicago rioting, Democrat rioting, mayhem and arson after the Trump 45 election, And JUST in case you have forgotten, let's not forget the DEMOCRAT KKK.

[exitseven]

yes, when the future of the country is at stake, politics ain;t beanbag.

[missindiana14]

Never. I would never wish death on someone because of their political views. Obviously the liberal democrats believe that cause we have seen it.

[Cidknee]

No, but you must allow self defensive violence.

[Dargil]

Correct. That is not militical. It's survival.

[Cidknee]

Yeah.

[KostasKouvalis]

I think for revenge and self defense.

[NathanDavis]

nope

[Anonymous]

No I don't but obviously democrats do