Do you believe that violence against someone who disagrees with you politically is acceptable?

[worldscolide]

2 Antifa members were arrested for violence against people doing a pro life event.

Here is the rub. I am pro choice my self, for the most part anyway. But the way i see it, the moment you use violence to get your point across your point, your view becomes invalid.

What do you think? Do you think its ok to attack and harm others who disagree with you?

Please keep it civil, i will delete comments that go against this site's TOS

[Fuentes]

It's always funny how they say ACAB but rent police out for their events and if anyone disagrees with them they instantly attack them and block everyone from walking & follow you to assault you. But if we ever attacked them? It's a hate crime.

Ontop of that calling themselves a peaceful protest and waving the BLM flag around with rainbows, commie flag as if that will protect them lol the clown world has gotta go.

[Valkyria]

Two words: gaslighting and projection.

[Fuentes]

@Valkyria it reeks from them hard lol

[monorprise]

@Valkyria So you think there was no violence during the 2020 BLM riots?

[Valkyria]

@monorprise That's what I said: projection. They call a disagreement against them or literally wanting to prevent deaths, "genocide", but them literally beating people up and setting cars and buildings on fire is "peaceful". Real corrupt people have ahold of what's allowed and what's not now.

A person on the right, or anyone who's against this for this matter, is arrested for sitting down and literally having a quiet protest, yet someone on the far left can scream, throw things at you and harass you however much they want, and you're apparently the problem. It's just a whole lot of narcissism and scapegoating.

We can't have an open discussion if they grew up never being confronted and always got pampered as a result. To one who had never been properly criticized, it will enrage them to hear even the slightest disagreement because they are so used to everybody being forced to agree with them. It's a deep insecurity on their end and low self-esteem, but it's not the "feel sorry for them" kind if they are taking it out on others and don't want to change.

[grega239]

Anyome engaging in political violence only shows how weak their argument is and how mentally fragile they are.

To add: im getting kinda sick of how the people being assaulted by wokians wanna take the high ground and "not stoop to their level".

I mean, at what point are they gonna realize that sometimes you need to swing back and put them in their place.

[worldscolide]

Preaching to the choir. I absolutely love where I live. BLM came here.. They marched down the street, the entire street was lined with heavily armed civilians, my self included. The mayor advised them that if they started violence, she would not hold the citizens responsible for their deaths.

[Friendlybro79]

Where was this? Wow.

[Agape93]

For having an opposing opinion? Absolutely not. For imposing an opposing belief on me, oh yeah, you're getting decked lol

[worldscolide]

Agreed. Let them speak, let them do as they wish, but don't force those beliefs on anyone. As much as I disagree with them, I refuse to take their right to speak.

[Agape93]

Exactly.

[Poppymarie]

In my opinion, violence is never the answer, especially for something as trivial as political opinions.

[OlderAndWiser]

It is NEVER acceptable to attack words with physical violence. NEVER!

[Friendlybro79]

I do not agree with violence because of a disagreement in politics. That said if one person acts violently towards another that doesn't mean their opinion before becoming violent isn't valid. It means that one person that F's up doesn't represent everyone else with that same view that isn't violent towards others.

This goes for any opinion or point of view. Doesn't have to be what I believe in. I think this makes sense lol

[exitseven]

I guess today it is considered acceptable for liberals to attach conservatives. If they should get srrested Ksmels Harris will bail them out of jail. If a conservstive beats iup a liberal it is ten yesrs in jail.

[Anonymous]

It is unfortunate that the ideology that doesn't believe in anyone's capability to think, speak, or do for themselfs also think themselfs of a right to use force to stop any other idea from being heard.

[DizzyDesii]

I think violence is only warranted in terms of self defense. This was uncalled for

[gorydetails]

I love them calling the people trying to speak freely "fascists" and preventing them from speaking using violence.

[NostalgiaSenpi]

Not at all. There's one thing to disagree, there's another to attack someone without proper provocation which would be defending yourself against their attack.

[WindAtMyBack]

In some cases yes. That is how the US and many/most other countries were formed. We've seen it throughout history. Even aside from the formation of countries, there has been a lot of major changes that were the result of civil disobedience and outright violence.

[worldscolide]

The moment you become violent is the moment your cause, your belief is irrelevant to me. Using violence to silence someone is the move of a worthless piece of shit child.

[LiamJHayden]

Violence is only acceptable when necessary in defense of self or others. Merely disagreeing? Never.

[noohair]

Violence should be a last resort to save a life. But out culture has normalized violence as a tool to solve problems.

[Anonymous]

Yeah, but silence is violence so it’s just self defense against someone being silent.

[Luopio27]

I hate violence on far left and right.