Polls: Society & Politics

What offends you here? Why? Is your knee-jerk answer different from your thought-out response?

Exhibit A:
Exhibit B:

I'm not Muslim but my family is

So on this site I've been hearing on both sides from men and women that:This has been sprouted for example:

1. Man risking his life to push a woman out of the way of danger. Severely damaging themselves.

2. Men who go out of their way to help women get over some obstacle in their life. Be it helping a girl pass a course she was failing, getting over a nasty breakup, helping an impoverish single mother.

3. This has been sprouted in girls using guy's as utilities. For example a girl using u as a charfeur to drive her around places, buy her gifts etc.

Anyways, do you agree with this stance that no matter what a man does, that women owe's him nothing?

Is it not offensive to people who are called John?

Judging by my month or two membership of this site, I can bet that this question has already been asked, and perhaps this isn't the best medium to be asking on. But still..

I get fed propaganda from both sides of the argument and it is quite frustrating. Finding an impartial source of information for such a controversial topic is like finding a needle in space.

So far, I am inclined to believe that there is no pay gap caused by sexism, but one caused by personal choices (which I suppose can be viewed as a sexist cause, depending on your own beliefs). I am not even sure if there is a gender pay gap. I have also been told that if you control all of the variables then there is little to no discrepancies. So, I am sat here, in a dazed, conflictingly-brainwashed confusion.

If you do comment then please provide credible sources, and keep it civil.

Also, I am stricltly talking about the US and the UK, since most of the users here live/are from there.

How do you deal with something? How do you prevent something from stressing you out? It can be anything.

Did you know that we have 2 constitutions? Yes, this true. We have the organic constitution FOR the United States of America, and then we have the constituon OF the UNITED STATES. The 2 constitutions are completely identical except for one word. FOR and OF. Most of you are reading this and are asking how is this relevant. You have no idea how much relevance and impact that one word has on you life! The UNITED STATES is a corporation. They are NOT a government. What is a government? It is a contract. What contract is that? Its the constitution. People do not understand what happen during the civil war. They thought Abraham Lincoln was some benovolent saint that wanted to free all the slaves. No, he was a tyrant that cared less about freeing slaves. He did what he did to strengthen the union! The truth to the history is that the Yankees were the aggressos, and the Confederate Army were the good guys fighting for states rights over the federal government (10th amendment) When the war was over, the government transitioned into a corporation and rewrote the constituton changing only one word! The UNITED STATES is a foreing entity on a foreign country. It only exists in the 10 square miles known as the District Of Columbia! So we have a a organic constitution ratified by congress in 1789 FOR the Unites States of America, and then we have the constituton OF the corporation known as the UNITED STATES. So you have a constitution for a corporation that is in effect, and then you have a oranic constitution for the people which is nearly inneffect! Stop voting, your vote means nothing! Every candidate is a puppet and have no real lgeitimacy!

Four elements are required to have a country. None of which exist today on American soil.
1) A government of, by and for the people.

2) De jure law, a judiciary and judicial. branch of government.

3) A de jure military.

4) Lawful money (backed by substance such as gold and silver).
UCC1-308 All rights reserved without prejudice!

Your very birth and existence is for getting married one day, and becoming a financial/emotional/physical/mental slave to your wife.

- Pay for her life
- Do all the work for her in bed
- Buy what she wants
- Get down on your knees and ask for her hand
- Do the approaching
- Accept you're the bad guy in a dispute even when you're not
- Shower her with compliments, or she'll leave
- Leave your job if she says
- Open doors and pull chairs. Be a gentleman.

You have to follow SOME of these things (among many others) if you're a western man. You're born to serve a female. You're officially and unofficially a second class citizen. You say you want equality to non-western people, because your mistress says so.

Or not?

Living in the U. S. for the entirety of my life thus far, I've always heard people's preferences on other country's accents. Yet I have hardly, if ever, heard Europeans' thoughts on American accents. Are they liked, and if so what type of American accent is more preferable (i. e. New York, New England, Southern, Midwestern, etc.)? Or are they generally disliked?

Ok so im black myself and im an oreo (black on the outside, white on the inside) and I know any race can be ghetto but I'm talking about the black kind here. I really really hate them. I wish that they would all die. They make a bad name for all of us "Oreos" if there are any reading this but you know what I really hate? The ghetto black girls ESPECIALLY the fat ones! I always look at YouTube comments and there is always that ugly fat black girl writing a long æss paragraph talking about stupid crap.

Mother once a month makes 6 year old son take her out to dinner in order to show him how women should be treated.





Do you agree with this behavoir?

Human beings are homo sapiens sapiens, and Neanderthal man is homo sapien neanderthalensis. The latter had white skin and lived here:


It has been found that europeans contain a large amount of their DNA even today, due to them being hybrids of inter-species breeding 5000-1000 years ago.

Neanderthals were a female dominated species, and just like almost every other female dominated species... they got wiped out... despite having bigger brains than humans

Ancient Spartans, Babylonians, Romans had all liberated their women and faced the consequences. Again, the whites have liberated them. But it seems that whites will truly go the way of the neanderthal this time if it continues...

Although they are very much human, and thus, whites have been male-dominated and highly patriarchal 99% of the time. But I guess that 10% neanderthal always rears its ugly head. What do you think? There is some evidence that Australian blacks and African blacks are hybrids as well, of some other homo subspecies.

ORIGINAL:



NEANDERTHAL:

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

HYBRID:

MGTOW basically means men who aren't going to get married. These men are the majority in the generation under 25. But many men are swearing off relationships as well.

Slowly men are wanting nothing to do with women...

Women are not just superior by law, institutions and social standards. There are also a lot of injustices going on by women & feminist countries... Basically men are oppressed and discriminated against in a large number of ways.

NOTE: This is done by the same feminist people who claim to support equality of the sexes. Women also only asked for equality, but they have manipulated their way to supremacy.