Polls: Society & Politics

Someone whose worldview is closer to yours, or at least someone you'd enjoy talking to and doing activities with more.

Should Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N. Y.) challenge Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N. Y.) for his seat in 2028 after democratic socialist candidates won victories in Democratic primaries last week?

New York primaries spur progressive calls for Ocasio-Cortez to challenge Schumer - https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5946437-ocasio-cortez-schumer-senate-new-york/amp/

Elon Musk: free-market capitalism, tech innovation, deregulation, SpaceX/Tesla/xAI outsider appeal, etc

Zohran Mamdani: democratic socialism, redistribution, tenant rights, public housing, working-class economic reform, etc

I would vote for Elon Musk because I trust a builder, innovator, and free-market capitalist far more than a democratic socialist.

Musk has actually created companies, jobs, technology, rockets, vehicles, infrastructure, and artificial intelligence platforms. He represents innovation, private enterprise, deregulation, and American technological strength.

Mamdani represents the opposite direction: redistribution, government expansion, rent control-style thinking, and democratic socialism. I do not want the country run by someone whose solution to every problem is more state control and more dependency.

So yes, between a flawed capitalist entrepreneur and a polished socialist politician, I would choose the capitalist builder every time.

Hypothetical: If someone born in the U. S. to an illegal immigrant mother was raised in a communist country, then returned as an adult and ran for president as a Democratic socialist, would you vote for him?

I would not vote for him. Being born on U. S. soil may make someone legally eligible under current interpretations, but that does not mean voters should ignore ideology, upbringing, loyalty, or worldview.

If someone was born here only because his mother entered illegally, then was raised in a communist country and returned as an adult promoting democratic socialism, that would raise serious questions for me about whether he truly understands or values the American constitutional system.

The fact that this could even theoretically happen shows why birthright citizenship deserves serious debate. Citizenship should not be reduced to a loophole that can later produce candidates shaped by anti-American ideologies.

I'm 100% convinced Democrats don't like America at all. They comes off behind smiles and fake passion as they care but they don't seem interested in the welfare of America at all.

I personally think birthright citizenship is pure stupidity and a great way to give your country's identity away to foreigners.

Rumors are and because of leaks. The supreme court may ban certain semi auto rifles and hand guns. My guess would be the AR-15 and 9mm Handguns , both popular choices for mass shootings.

AR-15 has little kick , easy to use and effective way to get off many rounds. Also many high profile targets have had AR -15 used against them.

So what will you do with your AR-15 when they are illegal? I assume a felony to own 3 to 5 years in prison and a fine.

Yep another big defeat for Trump. Anyone born here is an American.

The country needs this. People are getting older and couples here don't have children anymore. We need younger people to pay for older people. They made the right decision.

So Trump will have a fit , curse them out , insult them.

Also you now hear MAGA base blaming women on the decision. They want the voting rights of women to be taken away. They are nuts people.

Though when they dont like they fo with white people, we know...

Millions say they won’t celebrate July 4 as poll reveals deep national pessimism - https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/america250-independence-trump-divisions-pennsylvania-b3004933.html

If the Supreme Court is going to preserve automatic birthright citizenship, then the government should use every lawful tool available to prevent birth tourism. Denying visas when there is reason to believe someone is coming primarily to give birth is not sexism; it is immigration enforcement.

This policy would not be about punishing women for being pregnant. It would be about preventing people from using pregnancy as a pathway to secure automatic U. S. citizenship for a child. A sovereign country has the right to decide who enters and under what conditions.

- Gonna have to do it the hard way. issue no visas to pregnant women. if a woman has a child here she can never be considered for any kind of visa or green card for the rest of her life. no visas for family members of the child, ever. never allowed in the country again. -

Gonna have to do it the hard way. issue no visas to pregnant women. if a woman has a child here she can never be considered for any kind of visa or green card for the rest of her life. no visas for family members of the child, ever. never allowed in the country again. https://t.co/mDpFr9ivEx

— Phil Labonte 🇺🇸 (@philthatremains) June 30, 2026

I agree, and polling backs this up. Republican pride in America tends to remain high regardless of who is president, while Democratic pride drops sharply when they dislike who is in power or the direction of the country.

That is the difference I see. Republicans may criticize a president, Congress, or a bad policy, but conservative patriotism is usually rooted in loving America itself: the Constitution, liberty, the military, our history, and our founding principles.

Too many Democrats seem to treat America as worth loving only when their side controls it. When Republicans are in power, America suddenly becomes oppressive, racist, illegitimate, or broken. That is not ordinary criticism. That is conditional patriotism.

Are you voting Republican to see this disaster continue?

Are you voting Democrat to stop the Lunatic with Dementia Trump?

Or will you vote Split ticket or for Independents?

Or will you not vote at all?

I am voting mostly Democrats for the first time ever. I don't plan to vote for Any Republicans unless they stood for America and rebuked Trump.

He lost is rape case , I mean sexual Assault, must Pay Carol woman $5 million

He must allow all mail ballots to count even late votes. That one stung him. He probably filled his diaper with that one. He hoped Republicans could hold enough seats from illegal redistricting and ballots not counted,

He can't replace Fed Board Gov , that exceeds his authority.

He can;t track Americans via cell phones without Cause.

Court didn't rule on birth right citizenship but they expected to rule against Trump on that too.

So were you surprised Court ruled against Trump? Will Trump use Postal Service to confiscate mail in ballots anyway?