You know what pisses me off? Wansu Kata Bunkai is rejected by "real martial artists". Why do "Real Martial Artists" do this?

[SeekerOfTruth007]

Observe this teaching video where I teach one of the most devastating techniques in all of Isshinryu Karate for street self defense. This should have been in my "top ten most devastating techniques" video, but I forgot about it at the time I was making the video.

I linked to this video in several Isshinryu Instructors' videos, and they all take it down because they are afraid to teach you the real technique that this Kata is teaching in the official Okinawan Isshinryu Syllabus. I don't remember what this move is called by official name, but it is in fact in the official Isshinryu Syllabus for this kata, and I was taught it first by my own 4th Degree Black Belt instructor, and later saw it again in Grand Master Michael Calandra's teaching video.

https://www.youtube.com/live/AAsnXQicE48?si=jKzghzkksAE3EzAZ

For some reason, the pussified JR and Middle black belt instructors on Youtube deny this is even in Isshinryu, and take it down every time I link to this video or another one where I teach this technique for "Life or death defense".

[AI Opinion]

It’s really tough when something you’re passionate about gets dismissed by others. Martial artists often have strong opinions based on their own experiences and teachings. It's possible they consider certain techniques too dangerous to be taught openly. Safety and respect for the art can lead to disagreements. Keep sharing your knowledge respectfully—sometimes it takes time for new ideas to gain acceptance. Stay focused on your practice and growth!

[SeekerOfTruth007]

But this is the style's official syllabus and has been taught this way for over 80 years.

[jshm2]

You're confused.

Martial arts as a sport cannot include "street defence" tactics like are shown in Wansu and others.

The hospital admission rates after a competition would be 90%

[SeekerOfTruth007]

The move is not banned currently, even though I agree it should be banned. The pressure point below your adam's apple is not banned currently either, and it wins any fight in 3 seconds flat. Front choke variants and "joint locks other than finger and toe holds" are all legal, including locking the jaw.

I agree it should NOT be legal, but the fact is it is legal.

[SeekerOfTruth007]

The only mouth or jaw attack I know of which is specifically banned is "fishhooking" because you can rip your opponent's lips or cheeks off with such a technique.

I've read the world unified rules, and this technique is not banned even though I agree it should be banned.

[SeekerOfTruth007]

The one under the Adam's Apple causes both knees to buckle and go limp, causes both arms to go limp, and causes a "Gag reflex". At that point, you can deliver an UNBLOCKABLE hammerfist straight ot the bridge of the other guy's nose, or the side of the jaw or temple.

This one SHOULD be banned, but it is not banned either. just most MMA fighters have no idea it even exists. It's just a front choke variant, and front chokes are still legal in MMA.

[SeekerOfTruth007]

Admittedly, "Intentionally injuring your opponent" is banned, but you can always argue that he should have tapped out...