Where would you rather live?

[Kingofkings1992]

Luxury condo in Chicago

Ranch style home in Montana

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Chicago for two reasons. One, id never want to live in a red state again since they want to dumb down education and go after lgbt and try to nullify my marriage. Second reason is I am a big city girl at heart. Born and raised in a huge city in Texas. The idea of living in the middle of nowhere with no neighbors terrifies me.

I know my wife, who grew up that way, would love having several acres of land in the middle of nowhere but it isn't practical. Going anywhere is like planning a trip and not just a 5 minute drive where everything is within distance. The internet connections suck. If you have an emergency, there's no one around to help and getting official responders takes much longer.

So yeah, give me the crazy ass drivers of Chicago any day over Montana

[Levin]

Anywhere remote. First option, too many cunts, which is basically akin to rat living.

I'll never understand why people want to live in a big city, unless they're young and like the vibracy. But that would get old when you're like 25.

[loveslongnails]

Montana, a red state, is a disaster. I spent some time there and never want to again. Not a huge fan of Chicago either, but it does have great pizza and the Cubs, so I'd choose there to live in a heartbeat IF those are the choices.

[DryGermanGuy]

In current Murrica, you are in constant danger of getting shot in the big cities. So from these choices, I would go with Montana.

[BCRanger10]

Easily a ranch in Montana.

Though Chicago does have great food...

[LC75LC71]

Well Montana is closer to Arizona, where I want to live. I'm 3 hours from Chicago and wouldn't go back for any reason!

[Kelly6]

ranch