Can nude pictures of celebrities really be "sophisticated"?

[Fathoms77]

If you haven't heard, there's a new skin mag on the market: It's called Treats and some are calling it the upper-class replacement for Playboy. Of course, the magazine's creators wouldn't want us to call it a "skin mag" as they believe it to be a cut above:

“Playboy is for men. I do this for women,” founder and Editor in chief Steve Shaw told FOX411. “I shot for Playboy, Maxim, FHM and it was just cheesy. Forcing some poor actress to pose seductively. In Treats, the goal is to show beautiful, artistic images. It’s sensual, not sexual.”

So, what do you think? Still just nudie pics for dudes or is this REALLY something for women?

[Bandit74]

It's really up to individual intreptation. The editor might perceive the pictures one way but there's no garuntee the viewers will perceive them as intended. Whether or not something is art is vague and completely subjective.

Personally, I still see them as soft core porn. Not necessarily in the same league as strippers or porn stars but they play a similar sport.

However, the real question is about the democratics. Are most of their readers women who value the artistic depth of the pictures or are most of their viewers honrny dudes looking for high quality masterbation material with models and celebrities.

My guess would be the latter but I could be wrong 🙈

[Lightspeed-Lemon]

Yes, they can have a degree of sophistication. Some pics are neither porn nor fine art, but exist somewhere in the middle, straddling both genres. They could be arousing to some people but would also look at home in a frame hanging on the wall of some edgy art space. It's probably a tricky mark to hit but has been done with certain other magazines, like Lui and Purple Fashion. These are classier and more artistic than porn, which probably explains why major models, well respected photographers, and sometimes actors are willing to work for them.

[Laura_Marx]

Naked women are the subject of high art almost 90% of the time, dude. I don't think there's really a difference between high-culture art and low-culture pornography, except price. Indeed, when pornographic photos were first sold, they were marketed as "artist reference" manuals - not even cynically. They were sold as both. Serious artists would paint nudes based on the same pictures that others jerked off to.

[Laura_Marx]

by the way, go and google "treats magazine" and look at the images. You can see for yourself what they're going for; its definitely an art mag. It's kind of nudes you'll see on tumblr Aesthetic blogs, which are usually run by str8 women. He's not bullshitting, honestly.

[KittieCat]

Sports Illustrated does like a body edition every so often. It would be very hard for me to find those bodies sexually attractive but rather amazing and inspirational. Sure they're shopped but who cares lol.
But I can see where these people are coming from. But with a title like Treats?

[Bad-Advice-Boy]

Agree. The title is lame. lol.

[Laura_Marx]

LMAOOO yeah! That's such a porn mag title!

[Anonymous]

Nude photos can be very sophisticated if done properly

s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/.../...c1e3c39085.jpg
www.stockvault.net/.../203.jpg
speciallifeevents.files.wordpress.com/.../nude-photo.jpg
s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/.../...1c8db86b84.jpg

[MeghanL]

I don't know if "sophisticated" is a good word, but nudity can be tasteful & artistic.

[Mustachekitteh]

Just nudes for people to see, nothing special.

[Spiorad_Aisce]

Nude pics can be arty or sophisticated without showing breasts or genitals - If they do they are a "Skin Mag", hell even if pose is trashy it is being marketed as "Fap Material" under the guise of "Sophistication"

[TakeMaker]

I've never heard of a woman masturbating to static images, men on the other hand can knock one out to the chick on a shampoo bottle. I doubt it's for women.

[redeyemindtricks]

"I've never heard of a woman masturbating to static images"

^^ I've known a couple such women, but, (1) this was way back in the pre-internet days when static images were the only visual stimulation available without great effort, and, (2) the pictures were infused with a backstory (either accompanied by one, or given one by the women themselves in relation to their own experiences/fantasies/both).

[TakeMaker]

@redeyemindtricks I'm not saying no woman does but it isn't as common as it is with guys. The backstory counts a lot for girls :)

[redeyemindtricks]

Indeed.

Honestly, that's the ONLY reason I wish I could get into an average male brain for an hour or two -- I want to feel what that's like, to feel a raw overpowering lust for someone based solely on physical appearance alone. Because I... I know that's a thing, but I can't intuit it.

I mean, I'm as shallow and visual as women come -- I'm basically like a gay male gym bunny trapped in a woman's body -- but, still. STILL. That hot body that I want to do all sorts of dirty things to, has to at least *move* in ways that are sexy, or *do* things that are sexy, or... yeah, *something*.

I wish I could just experience that emotion, even for a few seconds. It would probably help me empathize with 10,000,000 boy problems a lot better than I can now.

[TakeMaker]

@redeyemindtricks I understand what you mean, like when guys comment that a woman is hot but you can't see her face. I don't get it. I can appreciate a physique but to state it's anything more than in good shape I need to see the face, same goes if Im looking at a man, and even then he's infinitely more attractive once I know something about him... or far less attractive depending on what I find out, ha!

I can't say I would want to feel that way though.

[redeyemindtricks]

Oh haha, no, I'm way more into bodies than faces (hence the gay gym bunny comment).
I mean... I could totally fuck a hot boy with a paper bag over his head. Oh shit did I say that?
media.giphy.com/media/TfLSZP6Z0Scpi/giphy.gif

I don't have to know anything too personal (although certain personal things CAN be irresistibly sexy, independently of physical looks). That extra je-ne-sais-quoi could also be dance moves, or hard physical labor, or... doing just about anything with an uncommon degree of smoothness, quickness and grace.

[TakeMaker]

@redeyemindtricks I'm the opposite. A headless image of the fittest guy in the world does absolutely nothing for me. Not the slightest bit of interest.

[Red_Arrow]

@redeyemindtricks - You sure make it hard to remember that you are married! :-)

[redeyemindtricks]

@Red_Arrow Hey, who said I wasn't talking about my husband? (: Oohh that man's still got a body on himmmmm

Besides, he knows what he's gotten himself into.
I mean... sometimes in our moments alone, I'll be grabbing and groping at him, and then I'll smirk at him and hit him with mah sweetest voice... "I love you for yr mind"
... a second or two of eye contact, then he'll laugh almost as hard as I will. ahha who are we kidding, I'm a vain shallow bitch.
That's when I spread 'em and say, "OK boy, show me why I *really* married you."

ahhahaaha <3

I mean... I really *do* love his mind! I swear I do! But... uhhh yeah that ain't what makes me want to fuck the boy senseless.

[Red_Arrow]

@redeyemindtricks - "I could totally fuck a hot boy with a paper bag over his head."

[redeyemindtricks]

@Red_Arrow @Red_Arrow Yep.

Oh, we've acted out plenty of masked-intruder fantasies. Maybe he knows the real reason why, maybe he doesn't. <3

[Red_Arrow]

@redeyemindtricks - mmmHmmmm. :-)

[Laura_Marx]

errrr, everything I'm about to write is WAYY too much information but I think its interesting so I wanted to say... so, TMI under the cut

=

=

=

=

LOOLLLLL, as a teen before discovering porn I totally did it over the girl on the shampoo bottle in the bathroom. For me I'm not more inclined toward moving images than static ones. Maybe it's because I'm pre-HRT (I have "male" levels of testosterone) but I want to say it's also because lesbianism. As in, girls look good static or moving, and men never look good, but better moving ;D ;D ;D

[Anonymous]

they might be TRYING to appeal to women. but it's basically just another marketing package. They're trying to make money off of the nude pic market so they'll obviously claim to be better than the rest but in reality, it's just more of the same stuff.

[Anonymous]

"Sensual" means "pleasure of the senses". When something is sexual, it gives off "pleasure of the senses".

I think Steve Shaw is just beating around the bush.

[alor1an]

of course they're not sophisticated. they're just saying that because they're celebrities.

[ThisDudeHere]

Nah, the same old same old but with a different brand.

[Chromekids]

Lesbians. But Treats is an artistic photography book/magazine along the lines of David Lachapelle. You could jack off to it but it's more for the crowd that thinks the female body is art.

[John_Doesnt]

It sounds less classy than Playboy because of how pompous the attempt is.

[BeastRB]

Who gives a fuck? I just wanna see Candice Swanepoel's titties.

[clampfan101]

Nude photos aren't sophisticated, but nude art is. (And playboy is certainly not art)

[Waffles731]

Yes, I do but not in that magazine style more like paintings and shit

[Anonymous]

I'm looking forward to the "in-depth" Kim K pics if you know what I mean.

Outside porn is so old fashioned, I only like the "tunnel vision" do you know what I am saying?

[Kevin342000]

Who cares. I'll look at any naked girl in a magazine!

[abundantlyrich]

I think they are overrated

[Anonymous]

Yes if they're done right

[JennieF]

Yeah, if they're done right.

[Popo21]

Lmao no, they're sluts

[Anonymous]

No, I don't think so.

[Anonymous]

ewww no !