New Science Reveals Climate Change IS A HOAX. Humans Have No Effect On Climate. Is This Fake Science Finally Going To Be Junked Once And For All?
This paper is pretty much just garbage science. It's got several problems:
- it hasn't been peer reviewed
- it doesn't cite a source for its information _at_all_
- it doesn't provide any information on the physics they think are at play
- all of the references are either the authors' own work or are conveniently unpublished anywhere
- it utilizes faulty logical reasoning
- it's confused about the meaning of causality
Here's a more detailed rundown, if you're interested:
Basically, people who aren't scientifically literate are in love with this manuscript simply because it agrees with them and their deeply flawed, self-serving worldview.
Settled science? How about settled bullshit.
Here's what we got from the so-called "scientifically literate."
"50 years of failed doomsday, eco-pocalyptic predictions; the so-called ‘experts’ are 0-50"
The "scientifically literate" predicted 50 of the last zero eco-catastrophes. Only a moron would believe anything they predict again.
Oh yeah? Show me where scientists predicted "zero eco-catastrophies". If you look closely, you'll notice the ones making hard and fast predictions are usually politicians or activists.
All that still doesn't change the fact that this paper you posted is absolute garbage from a scientific standpoint, and it does jack and shit to refute the fact that there's a consensus on anthropogenic climate change, backed by mountains of evidence.
I've been saying this for years since this rubbish first started popping up, once the sheep Gert wind of it they won't let go of it, even though it's been proven it'll be 10-15 years before the majority are on board with the truth
I'm afraid you are outvoted in human knowledge. Back to the looney bin with you.
You obviously didn't even read it since you posted your response 10 seconds after I posted the question. So you have zero credibility.
Your post has zero credibility. Climate change has already been linked to human activities.
Clearing rainforests which absorb carbon dioxide while releasing more carbon dioxide by burning fossil fuels and releasing heat trapping gasses into the atmosphere and doing so at an increasing rate has caused climate change.
This is an irrefutable fact. All the confirmation biased climate change denialist science you can find won't change this.
There you go. 5 links which 100% kill your little climate change denialist party.
I rest my case.
It's not "my post." It's a study conducted by scientists that proves that humans have no effect on climate.
Well your so-called "irrefutable fact," has just been refuted. I suggest you stop with the denial and read the study. I posted a link to the scientific paper.
Your case rested before you even started because it doesn't exist.
Sorry to have to break the sad news, but your case isn't sleeping... it's dead.
we as a group are destroying this planet
That's a belief. Beliefs are not science. This is science.
Be the first girl to share an opinion
and earn 1 more Xper point!
Most Helpful Opinions
This is not how scientific research works nor is it anything new. A couple percent of academic papers on the matter argue anthropogenic climate change is not real, yet the academic consensus is that it is real.
A single paper implying something does not mean the previous academic consensus has suddenly disappeared.
New research may shed another perspective on a phenomenon, and especially when it challenges previous research it will be examined by other researchers as well.
As of right now, the academic consensus is that there is indeed anthropogenic climate change. This single paper barely puts a dent in that. I
Only in the longer term, when others may destroy the linked paper or confirm it, is the consensus remotely likely to change.