Over the course of the conflict, do you think Ukraine got more military supplies from NATO or Russia?

[Ad_Quid_Orator]

And by that, I mean, do you think the weapons they received from NATO or the ones they captured from the Russians did more to aid their war effort.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/kyiv-auto-repair-shop-adapts-captured-russian-weapons-local-forces-2022-03-14/

NATO

Russia

[DaveJord]

Every time Russian equip has run up against United States / NATO equipment... the Russian crap gets its ass kicked.

Look at all the Wars with Isreal, Desert Storm, Iraq, Afghanistan War in the 1980s. Russian War material and stock is garbage.

Okay, the AK-47 is a good rifle I will give them that... but again the M-16 rifle and M-4 carbine has a better war record. But Russian Tanks, and Plans are garbage.

[genericname85]

we won't ever know the truth about that. i could both sides being the bigger "supplier" of weapons to destabilize the country first before they legitimate "interventing" to "help" them.

i neither think that the NATO nor russia had good legitimations to do that but i know eihter one of them would have ended up doing that anyway. it just so happens to be russia who did it first. probably, cause they were just closer to the border.

[jshm2]

Doesn't really matter as Ukraine will eventually fall.

The West is profiteering from the situation by supplying shitty weapons and false hope as well as stealing Russian assets under the pretense of "sanctions"

[Aerissa_Jade]

Probably NATO as the Russian ones will break down and be useless.

[spiralshape]

Eh, Ukraine is just BLM lite at this moment

[Iron_Man]

NATO