Why do news companies DESTROY their credibility instead of reporting news? seems pretty stupid strategy?

instead of talking about THIS GENERATION, biden is alive, so if emphasize racism, COULD condemn his personal involvement in segregation and school and busing, as kamala correctly pointed out... instead they write about "past in u. s." mislabelled as "news" and as world?

for who? to see
for who? to see

they try to pull and stretch the unrelated stain of slave owners (not called buyers, despite buying from "some" SELLER gasp) to descendants who did not personally DO slavery, in contrast to biden who PERSONALLY did segregation stuff. in general they talk about future "potential harm" instead of now and instead of whatever is now? i dunno kuz they dont say, the emphasis now is DESCENDANTS whether descendants of slaves who were not slaves, but deserve money? to a guy who did not experience slavery, and descendants of slave buyers by association targeting politicians, in picture, AS if ugly by association but innocent themselves.

luckily my news is not personalized so...

those names relate to israel news
those names relate to israel news

i got suggestions ALL 7 same topic... israel... nothing to do with me and all those click baits failing to attract my interest... which is... VARIED STUFF.

Why do news companies DESTROY their credibility instead of reporting news? seems pretty stupid strategy?
Post Opinion