Should YouTube have cancelled Russel Brand based on allegations?

Question

blueonblack22 · Accepted Answer

Why is that all the “allegations” always come pouring on all once? There is one accusation that sounds credible but the rest sound ridiculous. It’s a coordinated attack.

inhua · Accepted Answer

innocent until proven guilty via due process in the court of law no longer exists today it's guilty until proven innocent without due process from social media

pepsicoladog · Answer

They are using videos of him flirting as evidence even when the women said, they enjoyed it. Why did only one male comedian speak out and one female comedian who enjoyed his sex come out if the Daniel heard many women hear they should stay away? With 5 claims with claims of witnesses where are the witnesses and no police report? Went to the doctor, told friends, but waited to go to the media 6yrs after Me Too for an allegation that’s almost 20yrs old? Uh, ok if that’s how you want Justice done good luck. I know a family member’s ex wife who made accusations against 5 co-workers after she was told everytime she couldn’t leave the company without repaying sign on bonuses, she told my mom I said, I would kill my wife after joked to my wife if I was Jeff Bezo’s and had to pay $40billion I would just have her wacked as a joke. My wife said, she would wack me for $40. lol my sister inlaw said, it doesn’t matter that it was a joke. She filed for divorce after he paid for her nursing school and for her to go back to school. When he found out she slept with his best friend before and after marriage for 3yrs she accused him of sleeping with hookers. When he slept with hookers and was looking at porn after he found out of her cheating, she said, he was looking at kiddy porn. We caught her lies and she quickly admitted she didn’t see the computer screen after I said, I would take his computer to my friends at the FBI/CIA/and Homeland Security with my old job. She first claimed she was worried she would get in trouble for downloading movies illegally but then finally admitted she made the whole thing up bc he cheated on her by looking at Porn bc she fucked his best friend. She got my mom to loan her $40k for student loans, $50k for her credit card debt, and got my mom to put a condo in their name they were living in that they hadn’t even paid the taxes/condo fees for let alone the mortgage in 8yrs. She said, she had to move to another city to hours away for experience at an internship, moved in with some sucker before she intentionally got pregnant unless you believe she really got pregnant 5x before marriage, and 6x during marriage on accident by at least 5 different guys is true. She took out a full mortgage, second mortgage, and maxed out the credit cards in his name, talked him into not letting himself be able to take any money out or have access to the account, tried to tell the judge he was the one who spent the money, and she bought a brand new Honda Odyssey even though she had just gotten her husband to trade in his Santa Fe he bought for her for a Honda odyssey that was only 3yrs old. She then demanded $900/month/kid X 3 for child support even though he lost his job $60k/yr during Covid, hadn’t worked, and she complained $340/month was to much for his other son from another mom. She even wanted to fight for full custody when he didn’t even have custody of his son do to the girl moving to another city before giving birth bc she told her she was pregnant with his kid to when she wasn’t. She lied about being pregnant to get him married bc his father was Mormon even though he had another baby mamma. She manipulated him like she is with her new man whose Catholic. She’s now Catholic bc she doesn’t believe in the the Mormon Church anymore and she will change her beliefs with different people. One min she doesn’t believe in god and in front of other people she’s more Christian than Mormon or more Catholic than Christian baptist. Total Con.

D_Bone_Steak · Answer

This mother fucker basically said it better than I can...

https://www.youtube.com/embed/iwF8fd5Q27A

It's not just Russell Brand... this has been attempted by the left and its tool, the mainstream media over and over, and over and over.

This is a great learning moment for anyone who doesn't understand the media's tricks though (yes, this is a positive side potentially). First, they will try to play off your bias. "He fucked a 16 year old!" How did you respond to that? Did you not research that 16 is legal there and that when it happened he was a 19-year-old? If you're already seeing flaws in your prior logic, perhaps start to question the media before you question me. Look up that shit yourself if you don't believe me.

I don't want to do a deep dive on this shit... it's obvious from what I see... if you have a voice that speaks in a right-leaning position this stuff WILL be used against you by the media. 20 years... let that sink in.

They didn't have a problem when he was all down with the leftest agenda... but reason and logic finally got to him and he started to see shit for what it is... like the masks and shots was all bullshit. That's when the left will come for you. If you don't agree with their agenda... they will come for you.

The question is... will you hold your own opinion and stay on the facts... or be their cuck? It's hard, because they will try to destroy you. If you just stay fast though... they're the real cucks after all.

SolitarySolace · Answer

UK Parliament sends letters to social media platforms demanding demonization of Russell Brand
"Although it may be politically and socially easier for Rumble to join a cancel culture mob, doing so would be a violation of our company’s values and mission." - thepostmillennial.com/uk-parliament-sends-letters-to-social-media-platforms-demanding-demonization-of-russell-brand

AnusNdaPainus · Answer

It’s is insane that an ALLEGATION a fucking

ALLEGATION: a claim or assertion that someone has done something illegal or wrong, typically one made without proof.

you can literally Lie/make shit up about men and ruin their lives

as far as I’m concerned he is innocent.

MarshmalowTreats · Answer

People said that Trump could never have his own social media platform, and they were wrong.

I would love Elon to create his own video hosting site, and I bet it would kick YouTube’s ass. YouTube is totally biased, and only censors conservatives.

Screenwriter · Answer

Brand was drug addicted and messed up. He admits this. He might have done some stupid shit during that period that even HE doesn't remember. If you're fucked up you do fucked up things.

There's a possibility he did what's been accused. But the jury's still out. If he's guilty, he's going to have to put up a settlement and have good lawyers to avoid jail.

It'll all come out in the wash.

Rei13 · Answer

While I think that he is probably guilty based on the one victims story, and he probably deserves it, I do not think he should lose his livelihood until he is proven guilty. It is wrong to strip all that from someone when they could be innocent. If he is innocent it just destroyed his image and his source of income which is awful

Inbox · Answer

Oh no, how can we have a Democracy yet cancel people? That's like saying I want to ban guns, but I'm going to use guns to enforce that policy. You should talk to @WilmaReportu , she's an expert at cancelling and thinking she knows what's best for the entire world of 7.9 billion people LOL.

Drewtate · Answer

Wonder has he recently criticised the Biden regime, Pfizer, hawaii relief response, the Clinton's etc and has 3 million YouTube subscribers?

bolverk · Answer

All there is against him are anonymous allegations against him, the audio tracks in the public domain sound doctored at the least and AI productions at the worst, If you listen to some of the have a completely dead background which is virtually impossible and the voice is also dead, with zero inflections/no emotional content, No fear, No anger, which you would expect to be there if their charges were true.
And before you think I'm a fan of the man, I've never liked him.

supercutebutt · Answer

Mr. Brand is a jerk now. He should move to Russia.

Anonymous · Answer

innocent till proven guilty obv but tbh he's probably guilty. allegations like that about celebs are rarely wrong, like hollywood is a cesspool of rapists, pedos, etc

coachTanthony · Answer

Of course not. This is a blatant attack of "guilty before proven innocent" Just look at Michael Irvin. He got tossed off the air for a year and turns out nothing happened. It's crazy how they can cancel people these days.

CatVader · Answer

if he is deemed guilty, the judges should be hung. but that is the same with all the anti Assange anti snowden anti manning allegations back in the day. plenty of that sort where that came from.

thegreenyogi · Answer

I guess YouTube follows the policy of " innocent before proven guilty".

michol1 · Answer

I don’t know who this guy is but if there’s a trial let’s wait till all the evidence is out there I see no reason for a conspiracy without proper examination of the evidence

OfDeath · Answer

They should cancel him for being so annoying alone.

gorydetails · Answer

Of course not, they are attempting to unperson him.

Juxtapose · Answer

This is just more of The Matrix coming for people who speak out.

Kelley1 · Answer

Of course not; that is censorship, but YouTube is known for cersorship.

integrale77 · Answer

It seems wrong to demonatize him if people don't believe him they can vote with there feet

Avicenna · Answer

Absolutely not. Obviously, they did it based on his views.

islandgirlmutt · Answer

You tube should let the police handle him or even the law but what gives YouTube the right?

KostasKouvalis · Answer

I don't think so. I don't agree with his views, but he didn't violate any YouTube guidelines. And the YouTube staff shouldn't act like saints.

Twalli · Answer

They can cancel him for whatever reason they want. They don't even need to give a reason. I think their reason was "due to the allegations", not that he actually did what he's being accused of.

Anonymous · Answer

I had no idea who he is, and now I don't want to know anymore. It is sad how people rally behind these morons.

Anonymous · Answer

Well, they don't like his opinions so I guess any excuse to end him is fair game. Still, he got to bang Katie Perry so he still wins at life.

captain_voidwalker · Answer

I'm a big fan of innocent until proven guilty. They should have waited until after he was put on trial and convicted of something.

Anonymous · Answer

I don’t think it’s fair that they’ve already made up their mind about him. At the moment they’re still allegations.

Philyouup · Answer

i believe everyone should be innocent until proven otherwise

Anonymous · Answer

He is very outspoken and leans conservative, so he's had a target on his back with the woke cancel squad gunning for him for a long time.

JesseP1nk · Answer

Its not the new thing... Andrew Tate is also banned based on allegations.

jjj101010 · Answer

There’s no such thing as a fair trial when u get trail by media. The names of the accused should be confidential until they r proved guilty.

Dargil · Answer

Cancelled because of accusations?

butterly248 · Answer

I never liked him. Always something off with him.

exitseven · Answer

They should not be censoring anybody.

Luckycharms12 · Answer

No innocent until proven guilty

strateguy632 · Answer

nope

MaxUsefull · Answer

I never liked him, but no

Should YouTube have cancelled Russel Brand based on allegations?

Most Helpful Opinions

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Should YouTube have cancelled Russel Brand based on allegations?

Most Helpful Opinions

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

We're glad to see you liked this post.