Besides politicians, who's next to have an assassination attempt tried on them after Charlie Kirk?

[Anonymous]

So far we know Abraham Lincoln, John F Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr and Charlie Kirk have been assassinated

We know Ronald Reagan, Donald Trump, Andrew Tate, Nick Fuentes have had assassination attempts tried on them though they survived

We know 16 candidates from Germany's AFD political party have "mysteriously" lost their lives simultaneously

So, out of those listed below, who's mostly likely to be the next to have an assassination attempt tried on them?

Candace Owens is next

Tucker Carlson is next

Alex Jones is next

Jordan Peterson is next

Tommy Robinson is next

J. K Rowling is next

[D_Bone_Steak]

Your guess is as good as mine.

One thing we all know... both left and right... it's the left that will do the next one too. The right scares the shit out of most of the left and they gas each other up so much that one of them tries... keeps happening and their calls to violence doesn't stop... eventually they hit a target and celebrate. They're bleeding people that were on their side with that shit and their demons remain. The bleeding heart compassionate leftoids are not down with this shit and walk away at this point. Eventually the left will be nothing but evil left. I already view the one's left as evil or extremely retarded.

[Hardon-Collider]

Your premise is dead wrong. You're looking at this as a random, human-powered conspiracy. It's a spiritual economic mechanism. The actions of powerful people, especially those with a direct link to the 'spiritual economy' of a nation or a people, create real debts. These debts have to be paid. The spirits of the air, the elemental beings, are the ones who enforce this cosmic balance. They are the ones who 'execute' those whose actions have created an imbalance. It is not an assassination attempt by a human; it is a spiritual execution. It is a mechanism for closing a karmic book. It's not about power; it's about balance.

[Hardon-Collider]

and wtf, i did not hear about the german candidates.

[msmissydc]

About that 16 dead german nazis. It was only 6 nazis and 10 politicians from other parties like greens and social democratc. 16 is the total number of politicians that died (not even simultaneously) but during the whole process from creating the voting list until today. Also this is from a list of thousand of people from the older generations. Its not even top politicians or those that have a real chance to get voted in. The pure number seems high but statistically its about average considering politicians are generally older.

[Asker]

lol look at you calling them Nazis to justify their deaths

[msmissydc]

I dont call them nazis to justify their deaths. They where nazis before they died. And not everyone who dies was a nazis. But at tue same time I dont cry for dead nazis. Do you?

[Asker]

you're not fooling anyone missy. we all know about the Left's dehumanizing tactics you employ

[msmissydc]

So when the right is dehumanizing helpless refugees its ok, but when the left is calling neo fascists nazis its not? Explain that logic to me pls. Also nazis are number 1 when it comes to dehumanization. So yeah I am fine to use that on them.

[Asker]

lol these "helpless" refugees are all fighting age males coming together as grooming gangs

you'll find the Left has more in common with Nazis than the Right

but hey, feminists love protecting 3rd world toxic masculinity because that's what they need even at the detriment of themselves and their fellow feminists

[msmissydc]

I am searching really hard and no, the left I know has nothing to do with nazis. While the right is defending them and replicating their retoric and doing exactly what they did back then. So please give one example where you think the left are nazis.
The right are nazis because of thousand of reasons including dehumanization of refugees, their "we vs them" speeches, their 1920 views on women and minorities. Their hatred towards lgbtq+. Their ultranationalism and anti democratic tendencies.

[Asker]

lol the Left are the ones spewing antisemitism like the Nazis did, promoting abortion like the Nazis did, controlled the media and censorship like the Nazis did

heck their entire economic groundwork was founded on socialism hence national socialists

"we vs them" is used by the Left missy. the Left are famous for dehumanizing any woman, minority or LGBTQIAP+ member who disagrees with them

lol anti-democratic tendencies. that's hilarious when you're flooding the country with illegals to change voting demographics

[msmissydc]

The nazis did not promote abortion. Quite the opposite they forced women to birth. Where did you get the abortion thing wrong from? Them having the exact same views towards abortion and women like the righ conservatist is what is crazy for the left. That hitlers views are accepted as "conservative" today is just nuts.
Where is the left promoting censorship? You do know what censorship is right and what free speech is right? They also promoted propaganda like the right.
So please tell me on one law where the Nazis were actually socialist aside from the name? Should be easy according to you right? Name one part where they actually did something that is socialism?
Sadly they killed all true socialist right after hitler came to power. You know as one of their main political enemies. Their hatred towards socialism was one of the biggest factors towards getting power. Them being a worker party was pure populism. They did nothing like that once they got into power. Jews and socialist sat right beside each other in KZs you know that right? How can you be that uninformed while trying to argue about it? WTF. Read a history book!!!
Or is reading too woke for you?

[Asker]

nope. Nazis absolutely promoted abortion especially for babies who had Jewish blood. if a Nazi and a Jew had a baby, the baby had to die. Margaret Sanger the founder of Planned Parenthood was a huge supporter of Hitler. Hitler was beloved by many women. French women used to spread their legs for Nazi men once all the French men were slaughtered

The Charlie Kirk assassination and the reaction from the Left is proof of censorship alone. never mind it's right-wing opinions that are targeted on FaceBook, Reddit, YouTube, TikTok, Instagram etc. Promoting propaganda is what the Left does frequently. they told us the BLM protests were peaceful while cities were being burnt down. that's propaganda right there

Nazis took private property and made it the property of the government. there's socialism for you right there. no, it's not their hatred towards socialism they got them power. it's their hatred towards Jews that got them power.

you do realize anyone of any race can be a socialist and use the socialist ideology to favor their race, right? German socialists scared away Jewish socialists who then ran over to Russian socialists for help. all tyrannical governments require socialism to give them power

know your history first missy before projecting your lack of knowledge onto others, Nazis were anything but conservative. the government was their God not God himself

[msmissydc]

There was literally a death penalty for "aryan" abortions. And forced abortions for jews. Thats literally the opposite of pro-choice. So very much what the right wants.
Generally they took property from jews, and political enemies. Often they gave it to high ranking "aryan" families.
When it comes to their economic they pretty much had the exact same plan as trump, make germany independant again. There goal did not align at all with socialists. It was all to further their ultranationalist fascist plan.
You can't change facts, even if you wish you could, socialist where as much put into KZs, as democracts, jews and communists. They were clear political enemies.
Please explain how the kirk assassination is any kind of proof of censorship. Funny though that it happens under a fascist right wing government. So it is in your words proof that the right is doing censorship.
Which city burned down under blm protest?
Or did you can use it with the "peaceful" capital storming that had multiple. Victims.
But if you know so well what propaganda is then please explain how trump is not using propaganda with all the lies he tells on a daily basis just to further his plan.

[Asker]

there was no death penalty for abortions because abortion was unthinkable back then across the world. it's only in the modern era is abortion normalized and no, the Right believes in ending all abortions regardless of race, gender, sexuality, disability etc.

the Nazis took property from private citizens and gave it to the government, there's no correlation between independence and socialism. taking private property for the government is the hallmark of socialism and socialism can include fascism which every tyrannical government is

I'm not changing facts. you're failing to grasp it's socialists fighting against other socialists, the only difference between being race.

Charlie Kirk was assassinated for his speech, not because he murdered, raped, assaulted or stole from someone. he was murdered for his speech. which government it happens under is irrelevant because we know which idiots are the ones celebrating his assassination

no one on the Right is trying censor Charlie Kirk. the Left are the ones wanting him dead

Seattle and Minneapolis are two cities that burnt down during the BLM protest and did more damage than Jan 6 which only had 1 casualty whom was a Trump supporter herself

well, I guessed Trump lied about being a dictator when he ain't acting like a dictator at all. he should be going hard on all his enemies. you should be relieved he lied about being a dictator

[msmissydc]

And you lie again and got your facts wrong AGAIN!

[msmissydc]

alex.onb.ac.at/.../alex
I am not going to read your bulls it further when you can't even get your facts straight.

[Asker]

oh what a sore loser... making excuses to dodge me on purpose

[msmissydc]

He was killed by a right winger though. So if his death is proof for you that free speech is in danger then it's from the right, which is exactly my point again.
The left did not celebrate his death, even though kirk would have loved to. Because in his own words a few gun deaths are ok and necesary, for the second amendment to stay. You could say his death was just proving his point. Celebrating would be different, the right is treating a death of one their own just different than all the other gun deaths. They dont like that the left treats that gun death not different from a school shooting.

[msmissydc]

Oh I am not dodging you. I literally proved you wrong, so you need to come up with proof of your own. Because it doesn't make sense if you can lie your arguments together while I bring factual input. Why would I take anything you say as relevant when you just tell lie after lie?

[Asker]

lol the shooter was a Redditor (Reddit is a far-left site) who identified as a furry and has a trans girlfriend. you're not fooling anyone by accusing him of being a right-winger. his family and peers admitted he was becoming politically radicalized to the Left

the Left certainly celebrated Charlie Kirk's assassination

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCTXUG1NCbI

but too bad for them, karma would hit them later

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kA9Kmoecoe0

and no, Charlie did not say gun deaths are ok and no his death is not proving his point, only proving that Leftists should be the ones to lose their guns if the want to abuse the 2nd amendment like this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mdk5q8jYm80

[msmissydc]

Debating charlie kirk is easy. Only right wingers would fail at that.
Reddit being far left is crazy. Ahhah🤣🤣 reddit has subreddits for most people including incels, nazis and maggas. Its far from being a far left site. The infos that you have about him are nowhere to be found on any real website. But good try to further spread lies. Not even your propaganda machine foxnews has these infos.
So if I can't prove to you that abortion was illegal with a picture of the orginal law, that is crazy. So your kind of prove is, "I heard is somewhere" and thats enough, while the original source is not enough prove for you? 🤣🤣🤣🤣. Wow if that's your nivea of arguments no wonder you are right wing. The right is failing at basic understanding again as always.

[Asker]

yeah debating Charlie is so easy you had to resort to shooting him

there are no incel or nazi subreddits. regular subreddits that are meant to be bipartisan or have nothing to do with politics trend more left-wing. r/news, r/politics, r/law are all left-wing. so many comments celebrating Kirk's death on there, the mods had to delete them all.

you fail to mention the original law forced abortions upon non-Germans. selective illegal is not illegal. Nazi and left-wing abortions are all based around eugenics which in itself is racist like all left-wingers pretend they're not so yes, Nazis do support abortions just like racist left-wingers do

[Asker]

notice how you're trying to avoid the fact it's left-wingers celebrating Charlie Kirk's assassination and resorting to deleting comments

[msmissydc]

I disagree with celebrating any kind of murder. Unlike charlie kirk himself. Who said a few gun deaths are ok if that keeps the second amendment. So you could say he wanted to be shot or at least didn't care.
If you really think reddit is left wing you are further away from reality than I thought. WTF. There are more than enough far right wing subreddits. Yes the big ones are relativly neutral I give you that, but from your far right extremist viewpoint that must seem left wing. When in reality its relatively neutral. Of course talking world politics, reddit is not maga vs liberals. None of whom actually is much left leaning at all.

[msmissydc]

Also I did not shoot charlie. I am clearly against violence, unlike your daddy dictator.

[Asker]

Charlie Kirk didn't say gun deaths are ok. did you not watch the video? even then that's not celebrating gun deaths unlike the liberals cheering on his death

lol Reddit even calls itself a Left-wing site

www.reddit.com/.../

r/Conservative/ is the largest right-wing subreddit that has been around since 2008 with only 1.8M weekly visitors and 85K weekly contributions

compared to https://www.reddit.com/r/BlueskySkeets/ a left-wing subreddit that is less than 2 years old with 2.6M visitors and 102K users weekly contributions

Reddit isn't even close to neutral

let's take a random subreddit /Fishdom which is meant to be about a mobile game app and nothing to do with politics

now let's see what this subreddit says about Charlie Kirk

www.reddit.com/.../ as of now 4 comments yet 52 upvotes

www.reddit.com/.../ as of now 6 comments yet 19 upvotes

www.reddit.com/.../ as of now 228 comments and 200 upvotes

despite being a small subreddit with nothing to do with politics, it is overwhelmingly left leaning

if you want me to continue I will embarrass you on this. this is not even close to 1% of the left-wing shit Reddit contains and Tyler Robinson was a Redditor

[Anonymous]

Tommy Robinson. he's not American but he is a conservative who has spoken out about mass immigration and the Pakistani gang rape problem in England

[jshm2]

Kirk was shot - not "assassinated".