Why aren’t Republicans outraged about potential Iran sanctions relief?

[Anonymous]

“ Senior Trump administration officials said the U. S. and Iran have discussed sanctions relief, restoring Tehran’s access to some of its estimated $100 billion in frozen funds and a $300 billion fund to facilitate reconstruction and repair of war damage.”

Hey democrats would you tell your son to pay a bully like your Obama paid Iran to not bully America?

[Wholesome_Glory]

The focus on political maneuvering often misses the true mark of our existence. We are meant for something beyond the cycle of temporary comfort and reactive outrage. Life is defined by the pursuit of an enduring excellence that resonates far above these earthly disputes. When we fix our gaze upon the highest potential, we transcend the trivialities that keep others anchored in bitterness. Seek the summit where true purpose resides, and let every action be a deliberate step toward an objective greatness that illuminates the spirit. That is the only aim worth the cost of our time.

[jshm2]

The same reason police aren't outraged at returning stolen goods.

The money was STOLEN by the USA and allies. Disguising it as "sanctions" and other bullshit doesn't detract from that.

The actual number is likely a lot higher, as the USA and others has swallowed the interest of that money as well.

As for the reparations.. of course the loser has to pay reparations. The USA and Israel lost - now they get to scream "uncle" and pony up the cash to the victor.

[Anonymous]

If a Democrat did that lol, they'd be losing their minds for decades about it. Trump could burn their house down though and they'd thank him for it. That's how cults work.

[FrodoSkywalker007]

I think the argument is that this is all conditional in Iran fulfilling its side. With the JCPOA, Iran consistently ignored commitments. Also, all of this is frozen assets, or gulf state resources. That being said, I think Trump turned a military victory into a political stalemate. There are plenty of Republicans who are against this. It's also the fact the US and Iran are making different claims and the talks may very well collapse.

[goaded]

"With the JCPOA, Iran consistently ignored commitments." Really? Which ones?

There were international inspectors.

[FrodoSkywalker007]

@goaded Iran was permitted a 24 day window, which if denied would require a majority vote by the Joint Commision. Iran could easily use the time remove evidence of weaponization activity. They also denied access to military sites, as they claimed it was not covered by the agreement. There was also an investigation into Iran's commitment to the agreement by the IAEA that was released in December of 2015, that clearly shows the Iranian regime stonewalling efforts to their investigation. Instead of pursuing this, Obama closed the PMD investigation by a draft resolution. The Supreme leader actually reinterpreted the agreement in October of that year by stating it would delay inspections until sanction pressure, and the PMD investigation were closed. This wasn't anything new, at the time Iran also violated a UN missile bam by testing in November of that year. Simply put, it wasn't efficient at keeping the nuclear program in check, when the regime was known to be carrying out a weapons grade program throughout the decade.

[goaded]

Sorry, "Iran was permitted...", so how were they ignoring their commitments?

[strateguy632]

well that would be bad for israel, but we want america first! so trump is simply consistent.. ... if iran make the deal... we know they won't, then we offer the frozen assets. not gift like dumb democrats. and just conditions as frodo wrote very well.

[Danny_dan92]

I’m not republican or democrat.




Used to be both in different times of my life.




I’m simply outraged this is even a thing to begin with all because of the fact our entire government is controlled by Israel

[indissoluble]

What happened, did your high gas prices for election day narrative fizzle out?

[Anonymous]

Why are liberals?