Search Results: feminism

A pro-life writer based in Nashville asks, “Are men the future of the pro-life movement?”

Christopher Kuehl says if men heard 1 million babies were being killed on the Southern border, they would immediately spring into action. But news of 1 million ab*rtions annually brings little widespread response. Kuehl examines the main reasons he thinks men are less publicly pro-life than they should be, including being cowed by the message of feminism and the vague language used around that.

Watch the full story: ow. ly/CXRb50Z6csV

Men absolutely should be part of the future of the pro-life movement. The idea that men should stay silent on abortion because they are men is one of the most damaging feminist framings in the debate. If unborn children are human beings, then defending them is not “controlling women.” It is a moral responsibility that belongs to both men and women.

What do you think?…

Feminism because the economic argument falls apart under scrutiny. Historically, people raised large families through far worse financial crises, and even today, wealthy Nordic countries with massive government childcare subsidies and strong safety nets are seeing their birth rates crater. The root issue is an ideological crisis, not a financial one. Decades of feminist messaging have systematically dismantled traditional family structures, trading mutual interdependence for hyper-independence and corporate ladders. It has created a cultural rift where men and women are socialized to view each other as political adversaries rather than cooperative partners. You cannot solve a 'relationship recession' with economic policies when modern culture openly celebrates solitary lifestyles and treats the foundation of coupling as oppressive.

This poll is about ideological consistency. Is your political vote a package deal, or can you separate your personal values from your ballot?
Can a guy truly claim to oppose modern feminism and want a traditional relationship if he actively votes Democrat? That party’s platform expands the exact big-government tax structures, corporate quotas, and policies that fund institutional feminism and dismantle traditional family dynamics.
Is this position pure cognitive dissonance (funding the factory while claiming to hate what it builds), or is it justifiable?

I don’t know whether it’s the result of feminism or just a comfortable lifestyle, but this is something my relatives who visited there constantly mention. (France — where it’s supposedly at its peak — Spain, England, Scandinavia, Germany.) They say it’s like this all the way up to Poland, but once you get to Poland and Eastern Europe, women are much more feminine and soft.

Have you observed something like this?