Search Results: used man

Spider-Man Noir probably loses a clean, fair 1v1 against most modern Spider-Men because their raw feats, speed, agility, spider-sense, and experience against superpowered enemies are usually higher.

But Noir’s advantage is not a fair superhero-style fight. He is more of a detective/hunter type: darker, more tactical, and more willing to use stealth, traps, weapons, ambushes, intimidation, and dirty tactics.

My argument for how Noir could win is that he would try to make himself the only Spider-Man in the fight who can actually use webs effectively.

Against Spider-Men with technological web shooters, like MCU Peter or Andrew Garfield’s Spider-Man, Noir could target the devices first. If he damages or disables their web shooters, then the fight becomes much more even: spider-sense, agility, acrobatics, pain tolerance, and close-quarters instincts — but with Noir still having access to his own webbing and gear.

Against a Spider-Man with organic webbing, like Tobey Maguire’s Peter, Noir obviously cannot just break the web shooters. So he would have to attack Peter’s mental state instead. Tobey’s Peter has shown that his organic webbing can fail when he is emotionally conflicted or not in the right mental state. Noir could use fear, guilt, darkness, misdirection, psychological pressure, or carefully staged distractions to try to make Peter unable to use his webs at all.

Noir’s pain tolerance and darker mindset might help him survive the kind of brutal, psychological fight he would need to create, but that alone would not be enough because most Spider-Men are also extremely resilient.

So I do not think Noir wins by being physically superior. I think he only has a real chance if he turns the fight into sabotage, ambush, battlefield control, and mental pressure instead of a clean brawl.

Could Spider-Man Noir defeat other Spider-Men in a 1v1 matchup?

I am a reserved guy who's humble and well meaning. I've never thought of myself especially highly, and I always noticed I was a bit different. Over the past three years I started to get a lot of attention in public; women lingering with me, flirting in public, inviting to join their circles at the gym, asking me for directions, getting a bit flustered when taking my food orders sometimes, passing me smiley faces on vouchers or writing notes on my coffee lid... being the person I am, (A) I was initially oblivious, and (B) I had absolutely no idea what I was meant to do.

To use an American term, I am a "Wallflower"; someone who is present and tries to join in but struggles due to hesitation. Now here's where it gets interesting; the frequency and quality of the women that are drawn to me is particularly high, high enough for people to question it when they haven't seen what I look like. Now, I never thought of myself as anything particularly special; sure I had a few genetic quirks, but doesn't everyone...

Well... that's the thing: My body might be more masculine and athletic in appearance than it should be when compared to my personality and lack of training for two years. If you want specific stats, here you are:

- Height: 181.6 cm (5'11.5")
- Weight: 60 kg (lean, low body fat)
- Horizontal hip width: 31.8 cm
- Thigh circumference (each): 48 cm (standing, firm raw muscle)
- Calf circumference: 34.5 cm (standing, very firm raw muscle)
- Chest width: ~31.1 cm (narrow relative to hips)
- Glute protrusion: ~20% of side profile (untrained raw muscle, firm)
- Leg gap: ~4.54 cm (minimal gap despite thigh thickness)
- Shoe size: UK11 Men
- Palm width: ~9 cm
- Palm height: ~11 cm
- Middle Finger Length: ~6 cm
- Hair colour: Natural golden blonde (never dyed, never styled, only conditioner)
- Hair style: Basic side part with comb as it dries after washing hair
- Moustache colour: [Same as above]

A pro-life writer based in Nashville asks, “Are men the future of the pro-life movement?”

Christopher Kuehl says if men heard 1 million babies were being killed on the Southern border, they would immediately spring into action. But news of 1 million ab*rtions annually brings little widespread response. Kuehl examines the main reasons he thinks men are less publicly pro-life than they should be, including being cowed by the message of feminism and the vague language used around that.

Watch the full story: ow. ly/CXRb50Z6csV

Men absolutely should be part of the future of the pro-life movement. The idea that men should stay silent on abortion because they are men is one of the most damaging feminist framings in the debate. If unborn children are human beings, then defending them is not “controlling women.” It is a moral responsibility that belongs to both men and women.

What do you think?…

If you are really rich is it okay to split bills with your beautiful girlfriend who makes more modest money?

You pay for like the first 6 dates then split it 50/50.

Reasoning, both are working and you’ve only known her for a few months. You as the man don’t want to be used for money/date a gold digger. You want a girl that likes you for you.

Is that fair play?