Are men who don't have at least 100k in the bank really worth the hassle of dating or are they just "damaged goods"? (Page 2)

Question

Who wants a guy with a budget under 100k or damaged credit? Are women still single by age 35 "damaged goods"?

yofuknutz · Answer

You know what you can stop it sounds like a retard from Brooklyn.

Iron_Man · Answer

You’re gonna have to tell me how you feel about this?

lucas262 · Answer

What. Makes you worth it for a guy with over 100k?

Pussy isn't made of gold. And that is what most women rely on as if they don't realize there are what? 3.4 or 4 billion other pussys out there?

You may say well I'm honest and a good partner.

YES. To the man with over 100k but not to the man with 40k.

exitseven · Answer

Most people that have bad credit and are broke most of the time usually have other issues as well. Immaturity, dishonesty, laziness, lack of ambition. They do not make good dating material.

monkeynutts · Answer

We are a debt ridden society, 70% of the population have their wealth put into property.

slatyb · Answer

I agree. Poor money management is a sign of immaturity.

Birdlegs · Answer

How can not having that amount make you damaged? If I had $99,999 would that last dollar mean I can’t find a spouse? The damaged credit makes more sense but even so you can still fix it. These examples really just don’t work

sixtyeightplusone · Answer

a couple should have to have 100K before they are allowed to bring a child into the world, but if your single its all about you so do whatever the fuck you want.

By the way, the number of people walking around with 100K of cash or investible assets that is at a typical age to be dating (30ish) is extremely small so you would be disqualifying I'd guess 99% of males.

cheapshotbob · Answer

well for gold digging hoes i guess men like that are damaged goods, but those women will never find happiness , just stuff to make them fill special for that over inflated ego they have,

razelove · Answer

Call me damaged goods then. I'm not willing to go do the work that pays 100k anymore. I have things I could lose now, a modest life with my family is just fine.

Lliam · Answer

Are women who don't have at least 100k in the bank really worth the hassle of dating? And, no, women who are single by age 35 are not damaged goods.

ayomanwya · Answer

Remember when relationships weren’t about money? I do. It’s called the 90s

MzAsh · Answer

I don’t care how much money he’s got because I’ll have my own. Well, as long as he’s not borrowing or sponging off of me that is.

Truthatanycost · Answer

By the time you figure out the bulge in the wallet wasn't 100K... it would already be too late.

Smegskull · Answer

You can make more money, you can't get younger. Also if you have 100k and it's just sat in the bank you're doing money wrong.

Pterodon · Answer

What’s more important? In love happy and living paycheck to paycheck or settling? Is that how you view a man if he’s dateable is by his bank account? What if we judged you by your pussy?

Dchrls78104 · Answer

Don't worry about me; I'm already too old and too poor and off the market.

ohshee · Answer

This is the best part about having money in the bank it doesn't matter what anybody else thinks

matchrestore · Answer

If he has that much in the bank, you might want to stay away. Should at the very least be invested.

iseekpinetrees · Answer

Lmao no they are not damaged goods. Not having anything in savings is more a negative thought.

Are men who don't have at least 100k in the bank really worth the hassle of dating or are they just "damaged goods"? (Page 2)

What Girls & Guys Said

We're glad to see you liked this post.