If a couple beats on each other, is it still the man’s fault because he’s stronger?

[OddBeMe]

If it’s both, should there be a court program of separating abusive couples without assigning blame?

Who gets the dogs?

Yeah, men should just take it

Yeah, men can leave without getting too injured

No, they’re both wrong.

A total of 13 votes were cast: 3 girls and 10 guys. See detailed results

[lrina]

so what if he's stronger? that doesn't make much of a difference. whoever started it is entirely at fault.

[OddBeMe]

so you never hit a guy?

[lrina]

why would i?

[OddBeMe]

I don't know, I’ve had gfs hit me in anger. I probably deserved it.

[genericname85]

let me ask this differently. if you're an average man and you choose to attack and fight Brock Lesnar. was it unfair of Lesnar to beat you to a pulp? or were you dumb to attack him in the first place?

[genericname85]

i mean surely you know that you won't win the fight cause he's stronger.

[OddBeMe]

Don’t know the name, but I imagine Brock is wearing a sweater over his shoulders on a sailboat.

[genericname85]

He's a pretty massive and successful wrestler and MMA fighter.

[OddBeMe]

Ahh. So do you think the "Con Air" legal theory is correct? That a man trained to kill or beat up people have more of a legal obligation not to use that training?

[genericname85]

No xD it has nothing to do with that. Mean that if you physically attack someone that you literally have no chance of beating, cause they are infinitely stronger than you, morally you're not entitled to assume a victim role. Cause you were dumb enough to attack them.

I mean his professional fighting skills aren't the point here. That would be the case with someone like Bruce Lee, where you didn't know you're attacking someone that is vastly superior. With my example it's very obvious for every moron that there was never a chance for the attacker to win, so the attacker shouldn't play the victim after he got beat up, when they knew they would lose. That's true if the attacker is a woman too.

[OddBeMe]

agreed, as would the courts I think. Classic plot loophole in an otherwise perfect movie. Even Cage's accent was perfect... :)

[genericname85]

Well. I'm just saying my opinion. I know the law favours the one with less fighting experience. Cause the law assumes that the one with the less power or experience can't be the attacker, cause the law doesn't consider the idiocy of certain women in this regard.

[Sevenpointfive]

it's both of their faults and they are both stupid for being in that relationship. i've witnessed it firsthand and told them. if you see it you are also a little at fault for not doing anything

[Anonymous]

No sometimes you have to defend yourself and certain woman must be hit to stop them because words sometimes not enough. Now I don't mean beating them or punch them nope but a slap must be enough

[msc545]

According to the court of social opinion, it is ALWAYS the man's fault.

[Anonymous]

No. Amber heard beat in Johnny and not the other way around.
She is a c*nt and if she was hit she would deserve it.