Lol! I find this question hilarious! Don’t you know that all girls have their own beauty? Like i find each of these girls attractive in different ways and as I can’t see their bodies And especially not their personalities I can’t suggest in any way how I would actually feel about them in person but just judging off of their faces I would say that the hot girl or second on your list is actually like a 6 to me. She looks extreamily young and that is a turn off in some specific cases id also say that she looks like she gets lip filler which is also totally disgusting to me even though I have been attracted to girls who do it on numerous occasions I am totally turned off by it.
The pritty girl you placed third in the list is actually in my opinion quite pretty and I would give her a 9. The eyes the face the hair it all looks quite pleasant. I have also met girls who looked almost identical to her who were total bitches and instantly dropped from a 9 to a 6 in seconds…
next is the cute girl first on your list. I love it that that is somehow where she fell when you made up that list. But I would also give her a cute. A 7 or 8in my opinion and possible still more obviously attraction works off of the whole body and that I don’t have to give an opinion on… but her smile is warm my only issue is that she just has a kind of childish look to her. And I realize that all of these girls do. But some don’t remind you of it as others.
last but not least you placed the somewhere girl… lol! And I would give her an 8 she seems smart and deep. Lol! Which I know has nothing to do with anything… but I like it! There isn't really a whole lot that stands out to me about her but she is pretty.
Actually, using just the pics you posted (and not the terms), B would be my LAST choice, since she has the least natural beauty, prettiness, cuteness.
D is nice- she just needs to do something different with her hair so it's not all on one side of her head. I would go far as to say, with a new hairdo, and given an equal amount of make-up as any of the others, she would look "the prettiest", whatever that means.
C is nice in a 1970's - 1980's sort of way. (ref Lipton-type, Mod Squad).
That leaves B - the "cute" gal- as my preference of the above four. I guess I'm kind of stuck with the term "cute"- I'm just not terribly fond of it, the term that is.
"Cute" gals have a relaxed air about themselves- they do not "put on" airs. They have a good sense of humor and know when to use it and when not to, since they are smart enough to realize that in just about every piece of humor, someone has to be the butt of the joke.
"Cute" gals are not pompous: they are comfortable, "it seems like I knew you my whole life" types. And they smile, as anyone who has known me my whole life should. ;- )
"Cute" gals are comfortable in a bridal gown, casuals, sweats, or even nothing, as the situation dictates. And they are smart enough to know which situation is which: some women just don't.
"Cute" gals- since they are at ease with themselves- lend a relaxed ease to others as well. I could totally imagine myself after a crappy day and taking my shower- and then seeing "A" on the sofa, with a bowl of popcorn, ready to cuddle up and watch reruns of "You've Got Mail".
I prefer cute. I also like “hot” but tbh you won’t get very far with hot people because they’re only into hooking up. Cute guys are much more comfortable to be around they’re most likely sweet and have a golden retriever energy which I absolutely adore.
Jamie is hot
(I don’t know him personally so I’m not going to be making any assumptions towards who he is in his personal life im sure he is a sweet and super friendly guy in person, this is just an example)
Joseph is cute.
I prefer sexy and masculine ❤
Opinion
57Opinion
u In my experience, cute girls tend to be more fun, not high maintenance, and loyal.
All your options except the last one look like they are 16 or 17 years old. The last one looks like she is in her late 20s. I don't really understand your classifications either. The first girl looks like she has an expressive cute face to some degree sure. There are far better looking faces out there. Second one looks average and mad about it. Third girl looks average shy and chubby cheeked. Last women just looks a little older than the others, but still has a mildly expressive face. Generally cute and expressive faces lead to being pretty/hot if the body and personality is there to back it up.
hot and sometimes the pretty types of girls seem to be more self absorbed and/or really basic and just like every other hot/pretty girl. There are obviously many exceptions but at least in school, most of the hot/pretty girls tend to group up and then you know which group to avoid.
Also cute is just superior either way.
P. S just realized the "good looking but doesn't fit in that catagory" is pretty much the exceptions to the general rule I was talking about above.
There's one who fits all of the above descriptions and yet is too beautiful to fit in any of the above descriptions and her smile isn't for the faint-hearted. 😁 That's the type I prefer but so far I haven't seen another woman who's more beautiful than her. 😊
D) None of the above!
I prefer people who look more like these two pictures (in order)
1
2
Trust me, I'll take a geek or a nerd over a hot piece of @$$, because in the long run, having someone understand what I'm talking about is more important than the # of times we lay together. Ever try having a conversation with a wall, it's not enjoyable.
Without knowing any of them it's hard to pick because I don't think because of what they look like I picked because of who they are on the inside now the cute one she looks like she's just down to earth and she's happy she's content and she would probably be there you love her the second one I think it is I love her hair in the blonde I like her eyes but I mean I have to know who they are before I can pick there's something deeper about dating a girl than her looks
I like brunettes with warm sexy eyes -- minimal makeup. No lingerie-- which always looks dated and contrived.
No silicone. No Kardashian look. And tho I love bikinis, sexy one pieces are hotter.
+ freckles
+ nice swinging ass
+ class > clout
I am more interested and yet turned on by the cute girls. She is great to look at and more focused on building a great connection with me and trying to understand each other more and more as time goes on.
Don't care much as long as she is *attractive*. That being said, being physically attractive can only take you too far. No one wants to be with someone who's only got their looks to bring to the table. It'd be a lot better to date someone who's as beautiful in the inside as the outside. Ideal.
I've always been more drawn to the D types, though the A types are a close second. I've always stayed far away from the hot ones, as they tend to be too much into themselves and, generally, lack consideration for others.
None of those girls are pretty at all, to me. They look like slightly below average college chicks. Except maybe D. I guess I like a girl who's pretty on the inside and outside, so I'll vote option D (picture aside).
I see only one type in these photos.
"Poser"
They are all easy on the eyes I won't pretend otherwise but I don't find them so different in terms of looks.
They're all attractive but I love the cute girl's freckles.
Hot and pretty has always been very subjective and as a label, typically overrated. They get the most attention, especially online, but cute is and always has been relationship material.
Depends... if I'm looking to date her, I prefer a cute woman. If I'm looking for just sex, give me a hot woman.
My girlfriend is quirky and alternative.
Cute or good looking but doesn't fit into any of the three.
A womans definition of hot is 9/10 wildly different from a mans definition of hot.
I'm pretty cute so I need someone hot and good looking. That way we'd have the complete Instagram set!
