High Body Count for 30yo Female?

[Anonymous]

Been seeing some Andrew Tate content.

Reason for this post is a video of his regarding body count and “attractiveness”. He automatically assumes a single 30 yo woman is ran through and therefore unattractive (he randomly assumes a woman at this age has had 29 partners), and deems a 19 yo girl more attractive (he assumes that he’d be her 2nd or 3rd). Not sure how he is able to use a woman’s age to estimate their body count and feel secure in his judgement, but it does make me wonder what you all believe is a high body count for a 30 yo female. 2? 5? 8? 10 or more?

P. s: We all know men prefer a woman’s body count to be 0 or as close to none as possible!

[SueShe]

My perception of this highly controversial topic is that from the age 18 to 20, one should never ever have more than one single body on the trophy list. After the age of 21 and beyond, I would consider anyone having more bodies on the list than the equivalent of the age divided by 10 is unacceptable.

Thus, a person that is 29 (regardless of gender) should not have more than 2 bodies on the trophy list (10% of 29, rounded down to the next unit).

Any higher body count automatically increases the health risk for the next victim of a person with such high body counts. That, to me, is unacceptable and if I was into dating, the body counts would definitely be among the top 5 elements to take into account when choosing a potential date.

I only have one single health and I am certainly not willing to jeopardize it for a few pathetic muscular contractions and spasms...

[9214xs]

This sounds like something people would believe 20+ years ago.

[rachel776]

sounds like a hard pass just from his pattern of categorizing girls based on this alone

[msmissydc]

Believe me he is much worse.

[whiskeyontherocks]

Well you assumed all men want a virgin and that can’t be further from the truth.
As long as she values her self that’s usually enough for a man of good character. Likely that means she’s not been around the block more than once, cheated, etc.




Andrew Tate does not represent a majority of men. Myself included.

[WildCard42]

For me it isn't so much her bodycount, but rather her relationship history by 30 that I'm curious about. Does she have a history of committing to anyone for any substantial amount of time, or is she just a joke relationship-wise basically and I shouldn't get my heart set on her.

[SUMAIREBRAHIM]

Men with options will go for 18-21 years old , they don't care about money too and andrew is right about it but majority of men wouldn't have that ability to attract women as money and status is pretty rare as long as ur looking for average guy who isn't multi millionaire and good-looking u will be fine

[chicosuave]

because women have power to sleep with any guy they want. i bet there some that have a higher chance of sleeping with hundreds of men. for god sakes ugly women get laid more then the average guy.

[Anonymous]

Body count isn't what's important. It's the context that matters. If she has slept around casually with a bunch of different guys, she's disqualified from consideration as a wife or serious partner. If she has only had sex with past boyfriends, that means she respects herself and values the importance of commitment.

[Summeroflove]

I don’t really agree with him on a number of things. I’m pretty conservative. Yeah. Some women are like that. Sure. I won’t deny that.


But to make a baseless assumption on someone you don’t know. Is wrong.

[bigmatt98]

I don’t want a woman’s body count to be 0 but that’s just me body couldn’t doesn’t mean shit but virgins annoy me. And sometimes actually scare me lol. But nothing is wrong with a high body count or a low body count in my opinion.

[Anonymous]

I don't think most men assume a correlation between age and body count. I don't. But a woman who is single at 30 does raise other questions in my mind.

I'll also say most men don't want a woman with a 0 count. We just don't want a woman with a promiscuous past. I don't care what she's done sexually in the past as long as it was in committed relationships.

[tzdc21]

It depends on the guy. For me, 20 is too high of a number. 10, you're entering the caution zone. 6+ I'm getting a bit uncomfortable. And this is for women of ALL ages. Not just at 30. Other guys will be different.

[TroyDT2]

Practically, unless she's a virgin with an intact hymen how would the guy know? She could say "5" when it is really 50 or 100.

[9214xs]

I’d probably consider maybe 500+ a bit high but in saying that I consider it to be the higher the better. Women should be able to fuck whoever they want and not care about numbers.

[Motheman]

For a 30 year old 10 would be the absolute max. Do want a chick thats been ran through.

[animesenpai]

Body count diesbt matter tbh. I just always assume I won't be someone's best or worst

[Jack122112]

Any number over 3-4 for any woman, of any age... is too high. Its disgusting.

[LuxyB]

Women you should be more careful don’t become a tester for a man.

[Anonymous]

I am not interested in women who have a higher body count than me. So for me it is 1.

[mandyfire98]

Andrew Tate is a buffoon.

[Luckycharms12]

I don't care ehst it Is I'm not insacure

[Anonymous]

More than 5.