Why do I have such a great chemistry with girls I wouldn't have a serious relationship with and such a lack of chemistry with women I would marry?

[Anonymous]

[AhemAhemAhem]

Only you can answer that. First off, what are you calling 'good chemistry', exactly? And secondly, what is it that differentiates these 'girls: you 'wouldn't have a serious relationship with' and those 'women' you 'would marry'?

Those answers need to be clear first.

[Asker]

Good chemistry is that you feel good around each other, you want to be in their presence as much as possible, you are available to each other. Those I would have marry have low body count, they are loyal and rational. Girls I wouldn't have a serious relationship with are fun people, but not so loyal and more emotional.

[AhemAhemAhem]

Why does a woman's sexual history matter to you? Why do you think someone who had more sexual partners would make a worse life partner? In my experience, a woman who has real experience behind her, makes for a far more stable and trustworthy partner, than someone potentially naive.

Is there someone you have great chemistry with who has been disloyal to you? If not, where are you getting these ideas from? One hunch I'm getting, is that your approach to women has been negatively affected by bad ideas that are found within the 'manosphere' and red pill culture. Either way, you should be asking yourself a lot of questions about what you truly value and need deep down, and not simply what you have been told you probably want by other men.

[jahaims]

Why would you want to marry someone you have bad chemistry with over someone you have good chemistry with?

[Asker]

Women I would marry are flaky with me

[jahaims]

If you aren't desirable to the caliber of women you desire, then you are being unrealistic.

[Asker]

We are evenly matched I would say, in terms of looks, profession, intelligence

[Plugs]

Lol u clearly aren’t. No wonder they run

[Asker]

@plugs Yes, no doubt about that. You better than I know myself