If you could chose, would u be a man or a woman?

[chocolatetwopointo]

totally a man, its sm easier. no high expectations, no standards, basically no rules to follow, and if my girlfriend gets pregnant, ill js leave! so easy!

[sawno]

I'm fine being a man, but its not like women have it harder than we do. We do have really high expectations evidenced how much harder it is to get a partner if your a man. If we don't follow rules there's big consequences and if she leaves we get screwed by the courts. I think your take is quite ignorant of how difficult mens lives can be and if you actually lived like a man you may find it more challenging than you thought.

Its much healthier to look at the different issues both genders are having as different things that make their lives hard. Rather than assuming that because the other gender doesn't have your issues that its fine.

Like lets look at your list, no high expectations. Thats true if you don't want there to be high expectations and settle for low rewards. Your not gonna get a quality partner or a family out of that one. No standards same thing, you can choose that but you end alone and unhappy. No rules to follow, tell that to the guy fired from his job or the guy who went to jail. Leaving her with the baby only works until the court orders you to pay.

Now lets compare shall we? Lets take the low quality girl example to match the low quality guy your portraying. She has no high expectations either, if she's pretty that's all she needs to be. If she's ugly then its like the guy where its not like people will care. No standards is totally a choice for her to, same unhappy outcome as the guy although if its no standards in another direction she can make money having no standards. No rules to follow also doesn't apply here. Pregancy many girls opt for abortions instead of responsibility.

So every thing you project on men can apply to you to. Except that the standards of being carried by looks alone are lower for young women, guys have to earn any sort of respect.

If you want a successful happy life or a family it does not matter if you are a stay at home mom or a hard working parent with a day job. Its serious responsibility and does not come easy or free for most of us, regardless of gender.

[chocolatetwopointo]

what rules gets u big concequences? and wdym if she leaves u get screwed in court? ur biggest problem is the ”i can't show emotions” shit which is complete bs bc nowadays u can.
i mean high society from society etc.
many men flee the country to avoid child support, u can't pull that card. oh god u missunderstood is to bad🤦‍♀️ basic man. but its true that men have higher standards and demand an anime built girl.
isn't abortion taking responsebility? and why aren't u telling that to the million men leaving pregnant girls?

[Shiprex]

Man as there's no pressure about appearance and I don't care or want to care about my appearance, I don't even see me most of the day.

However, having a much wider range of options to dress would be a benefit bit it could lead to a greater stress of the dilemma of choices.

That women can get away with being rude and it's not seen as offensive is another thing that could be helpful.

Knowing there are lots of people who would step in to help or protect if I were in a tough situation that may potentially go out of my control would be strengthening BUT the notion that it would be easy to end up there not so which is a negative of being a man, no one is coming to save you.

[chocolatetwopointo]

nobodys stopping u from wearing dresses as a man🤷‍♀️
and women dont get away with being rude, thats bs. and noone would protect us either lmao I don't know where ur getting this from.

[Shiprex]

No one is STOPPING dressing any way they want though the concept of stigma associated with it is still present and as a strategy to attract a romantic partner it's not going to work is it? Women dressing masculine is common and accepted by men, men dressing like women not so
Women get away with being rude and obnoxious a lot. A man approaches her and she's like "Eww, get away from me you creep" and she's seen as empowered (not it's not the 2nd, 3rd or tenth time the FIRST TIME) and standing up for herself.

As for the protecting in public you've not seen the DV social experiments have you? They've been doing them for decades now and the same outcome. A dude shouting, pushing and abusing a woman in public will ALWAYS get stopped usually by other men, catch a woman doing it to a man and the initial response is "He MUST have done something to deserve it" or some other excuse and NO one steps in but some even JOIN IN with the abuse. Youtube is your friend

[chocolatetwopointo]

if she doesn't like u being u, u shouldn't be together?
no woman has ever been seen as empowered for saying that.
and ur another one who believes in those fake ass social experiments? they’re staged, surprise! youtube? bro get out💀 naive much?

[Shiprex]

Fake social experiments? LOL You only need to go try it for yourself but of course you'd not do that because there's NOT guy would actively go out and do it. You're probably one of those who thought women don't abuse men in relationships too even though most women admit it but of course those will be staged too.
Women seen rejecting men in exuberant manners are absolutely revered, YOU GO GIRL and all the other bitchy ways they act after being approached.

What do you mean about you being you? A man dressing like a woman? If you're saying most women would be content and attracted to men dressed femininely?

[chocolatetwopointo]

nope ik women abuse men too, but those r staged.
nobody has ever said that.
nah im saying the right woman would love u for u even if u wore dresses

[Shiprex]

The social experiments are not staged you're making shit up.

WOMEN in general would NOT be as open as men to the notion that their partner wearing clothes in the opposite gender to their sex. That is still a stigma that men have accepted from women but women still expect men to stick to the conventional gender roles.

[chocolatetwopointo]

nope they’re 100% staged.
yeah in general, but some are. and if she's the right one she’ll accept u for who u are.

[Shiprex]

Bullshit they're just people on the street acting and seeing how members of the public react to situations. It's not a conspiracy because it shows societal attitudes towards women as favourable and to men as disturbing. Women have been the purpose behind the creation and construction of society to PROTECT and serve their needs and desires.

As for women dressed masculine being accepted as valid potential mates that's a 100% given and a man who insisted his female SO HAD to appear feminine at all times would be outed as abusive and YOU KNOW THIS.
Very few Women, in comparison, would see men in feminine attire appealing in the slightest. They are far more conventional in their expectations from potential relationship partners.
Women are far more intolerant of men who do not adhere to patriarchal conventional and traditional dress codes.

[chocolatetwopointo]

nope its staged, stop being so naive. and maybe js maybe, bc a woman could not handle a man attacking them the same way a man could, its simple biology.
who said anything about forcing? anyone who forces their partner to do anything is an abuser, not js men.
yeah very few bc its not the norm, but u as a man can get other men to do it and it’ll become a norm if u keep it going for a while.

[Shiprex]

@chocolatetwopointo
I know a man is more capable of doing more serious PHYSICAL damage to a woman BUT you should also know the EMOTIONAL, PSYCHOLOGICAL and MENTAL harm being abused in public does to a man's self esteem. THIS is known to be just as bad. Physically striking a man by a woman will get ZERO attention and even less from other women who will ALWAYS excuse it with some BS "must have done something" or "probably deserved it" toxic misandry response,

Dipping your head in the sand and ignoring it means you're dismissing the reality that men are as likely to be abused by women as women are by men (these studies are also factual no matter what feminist lies you want to use).

The scenes are not staged that's just you justifying that men will ALWAYS be given the shitty end of the stick when it comes to DV, Just look at how courts dismiss bad behaviour of women when they commit crimes. Less than half the level of punishment for the same act. Scandalous.

[chocolatetwopointo]

lmao if u think a man getting striked by a woman won't turn any heads, ur fucking delusional💀 stop trying to be an attention seeker and accept that ur not always the victim.
sure, who says im ignoring it? if i saw smth id say smth.
nope its staged. ur js naive. id love ur sources on the last take.

[Shiprex]

@chocolatetwopointo

A man being hit by a woman will get cameras out and likely waiting to see if she will goad him into hitting her back and who then gets the blame?

Would anyone step in to STOP her? NOPE

If a guy starts yelling and pushing or grabbing a woman in public you KNOW within seconds there will be folk stepping in and ending it pronto.

SAYING something is a start but would you step in and STOP it? I doubt it but a lot of men would. Women know they are weak and fear the damage that can be done, men know but are more likely to take a risk and step in.

[chocolatetwopointo]

she will get the blame bc she hit him first. people will stop her. stop being so delusional. go out and try it urself if ur so sure it works like that.
yes.. it would be the same if a woman was doing it to a man. i dont think id risk getting hurt in a situation like that, yeah bc a man could take on a man. im a woman, i could probably take on a woman, so if it was a woman i probably would, but i wouldn't risk it if it was a man (which it in most cases are, u can't deny that). sorry i dont wanna get killed on the street for simply helping? tf? if they had a weapon nobody would risk it either.

[Shiprex]

That's noble of you and in fact a lot of situations when a woman steps in between men, the aggressor is often brought back from the red mist state as social conditioning truggers that "you don't hit women" take over.
Her getting the blame is too late, she will do it, society will say "he must've done something to deserve it ", "he can fend for himself", "you go girl" in complete ignorance of context, "he deserves it" the misandrist response and even joining in to help and berate him. Men won't stop her because they could do her harm AND get accused of sexually assaulting her thus not worth the risk and women have gotten into their heads it must be justified because women don't do stuff that's not justified.

[chocolatetwopointo]

not always, I've even seen it happen when a woman got punched while stopping a fight bc they were angry at eachother, not risking it.
no offense, but it usually is like that. a man gets rejected and he gets angry, its sad so many men ruined it for u, but if u explain to the people later what actually happened or anything along those lines, so its obvious u didn't start it, nobody will say stuff like that.

[Shiprex]

I've seen women get thumped too sometimes after they threw the first hit and they deserve it BUT only sufficient force should be used in defence.
After the fact explaining doesn't stop or hold them accountable. There's a shit load of social stigma attached to being disrespected and abused by a weaker person (women especially) in public and having to THEN explain your side (everyone applies the "he deserved" excuse) because women are seldom held accountable for bad behaviour.

[Anonymous]

I'm happy being a woman. Life's very hard for men. Look at all those men who get divorced and end up not seeing their children, losing half their money and forced to pay alimony and child support. So many women are absolutely ruthless at the end of a relationship and false allegations are so easy to make.

[abbyjgriffin98]

I think it's easier to assume the opposite gender has it easier. But men have never lived a day as women and women have never lived a day as men. But to answer your question, because I do not have Gender Dysphoria, I prefer to be a woman.

[Summeroflove]

Well you seem to hate men so I don’t know why in the world you would ever want to be one

[chocolatetwopointo]

bc its easier, i js told u and gave so many reasons?

[Summeroflove]

Okay the grass is greener on the other side

[lil_will_12]

Youd take this back if we had a ww3 and you got drafted..

However to compare war with what women go through their whole life, its unfair. Not every man goes to war. But you get my point here.

i personally would choose to be a woman. I want to know what its like. We all want what we dont have after all🤷‍♂️

[chocolatetwopointo]

nah id wanna fight for my country. and have u ever been to war? exactly. every woman you will ever talk to, has or will have a story ab a man being creepy or rape story.
let me tell u how its like. men have high ass standards u can't be fat but u can't be too skinny either, but if u wear makeup ur fake, but if u dont ur ugly, you’ll always have to fear if ur gna get killed or raped etc esp at night, can't wear what u want bc of, surprise MEN. and lots more but i dont feel like writing a 1000 word essay.

[Agape93]

Can confirm, I could write a book

[lil_will_12]

Yeah ig the only logical thing to do is just kill all men🙄

Do you know why i would want to be a woman? So i could sympathize with their problems bc i, as a man, have never experienced something like that. You should walk in someone elses shoes before you make assumptions

[chocolatetwopointo]

i mean, if u want to🤷‍♀️

[Apple1996]

Even tho being a man is easier I'd still choose to be a woman since we have more power and are more intune with the earth. Men are clueless about a lot of shit so I wouldn't want be that dumb 😂

[MasterKS]

@Apple1996 LMAO!

[lil_will_12]

Define “power” in this instance🤔
Also, you are implying men in general are stupid if you think you would become dumb by becoming a guy. “Men” and “dumb” really shouldn't be connected, rather it depends on the individual themself☝️🤓

Most guys aren't stupid, they just dont use their brain🙄

[Apple1996]

@lil_will_12 like I said men are just clueless about a lot of stuff. It's common that men will figure out things about life at 50 years old that little girls were discussing at their 7 year old sleep overs 😂

[Apple1996]

@lil_will_12 power like being connected to the earth and being able to create life. Obviously men have their own powers but I wouldn't want any of thoses

[lil_will_12]

Ya creating life is a power i suppose, and a big one too. Although i still fail to see how women are connected to the earth 🤷‍♂️ or more so than men

[Shiprex]

@Apple1996
LOL ok Karen

[JessyJoy]

Don't worry folks, she is a manhater coming up with all kinds of crap that does not hold true to reality. Ignore her.

[JessyJoy]

@Apple1996 @lil_will_12 A man can easily create as many lives without going through pregnancy, rather impregnate his wives and father as many children as he wants.

And what are you babbling about "connected to the earth"? Are you from a cult?

[JessyJoy]

@lil_will_12 We don't "create life". She is just one of those women trying to oversimplify and over exaggerate "gestating newborns" to a whole other level that does not hold true to reality. But just to feel good about themselves so they feel as powerful as men. Every sane normal woman knows it takes two to make one. But women like her are just extremely deluded because they chose to. And because they deny being biologically less powerful than men. They hold extreme malicious envy towards masculinity and the attributes of masculinity: power, strength, courage, honor, primary, etc. So they try to come up with magic words like "create life" and more magic words like "connected to the universe" so they could feel as mighty as men but biology denies it.

I know this because I struggled with this as well before my 8 months of rehab from the internet.

[Shiprex]

@JessyJoy wow, unicorns are here

[Apple1996]

@Shiprex she's a dude

[Shiprex]

@Apple1996 impersonating a unicorn. Gag filters need realigned they're mixing the colours up.

[JessyJoy]

Go outside once in a while. Men are naturally more powerful, every "redpill" women or whatever you may call it know that. Your fantasy words "create life" and "connected to the Earth" are what they are: fantasy magic words that do not hold true to reality.

You know men have more power and because of their responsibility they have it harder but they can handle that as they are stronger than us. But you tend to switch it around a bit to make yourself feel good and look like a man.

[JessyJoy]

@Shiprex What do you mean?

[JessyJoy]

@Shiprex No, I am a woman. And perhaps millions of women would also agree on me with what I have said above. Not every woman in this planet joined 4bmovement or whatever filth they are in.

[Shiprex]

@JessyJoy that you're rare take on how things are is antithetical of the modern 4th wave Feminist
It's refreshing to see it written as there are quite a few women vloging this same message

[JessyJoy]

@Shiprex @Apple1996 It is important to acknowledge that millions of rational women worldwide would likely perceive the individual who espouses the idea of "power to be connected to the Earth and create life" as mentally unstable. I think it would be beneficial for you to take a step back or temporarily disengage from the internet and media for a few months. Upon returning, re-reading such statements might reveal how absurd she sounds. Mere fantasy words to feel good.

In today's era, people are deeply immersed in media on their smartphones, often believing everything they see on screen. This has made them a potent tool for those who control the narrative.

Here's an insight from a former radical feminist: women often express such sentiments due to a deep-seated envy that men are "greater" than women are in a pure biological and natural level. As they can cause more impact to the civilization than we women do. It is important to note that this does not diminish women's value; we are also great but men have a degree above us. The existence of feminism, the desire to emulate men, and the fascination with masculine traits like strength, independence, bravery, and assertiveness stem from the fact that these qualities are traditionally associated with men. Sometimes, it seems that you men can be oblivious to these dynamics (the very fact that women just envy men), despite being constantly exposed to feminist ideologies through the media.

[Shiprex]

@JessyJoy I partly agree with you. I don't believe women envy men though. They are more sensitive about their status and that they are inherently weaker. What they DON'T realise on the whole is just how benevolent men are. That IF it were decreed by some radical misogynist (Augustus TRIMP the next x3 US president standing on a MANverse platform for example) chose to run on a Traditional Evangelical Capitalistism KINGdominion (TECK movement) that it would be very easy to subjugate women as the Handmaids Tale comes to life. Like Idiocracy seems to be a premonition being fulfilled as we speak.

The notion that women ARE the bearers of new life is not a huge step from being the ones who's bodies are for that purpose, that's not irrational in the slightest. Elaboration of this as saying they "create life" in a sense is right because it's IN THEIR bodies the new life takes root and is in effect produced within them.
The fact men are stronger DOES not make them greater unless you put value on physical strength versus nurturing and collaboration as human traits. Human's have unfortunately names us the human RACE and too many people can't escape the different notions of that word. It's NOT a race because no one wins, everyone dies and men die sooner in general so there you can say they aren't greater. True that one man can sustain many families but that suggests there's less need for men then and that women would be the ones to repopulate an extinguishing race which makes THEM a greater or more important asset. So it's a complicated issue that I've waffled on too long about now.
Thanks for the input @JessyJoy and @Apple1996

[JessyJoy]

@Shiprex @Shiprex Bearers of life, yes. However, men and women do not create life alone because it is the two gametes (male and female) that perform their roles in creating a fetus. Saying "create life" is biologically incorrect. Just ask any biology teacher who understands how reproduction works; they will tell you the same. Furthermore, it is inaccurate to use the oversimplified term "life" instead of "fetus." A child might interpret it incorrectly if they do not understand how reproduction works. Many modern women prefer using the term "life" because it sounds more grandiose than "fetus." Feminists often manipulate words to fit their narratives. I used this tactic myself when I was a radical feminist some time ago.

Being stronger is a trait that makes men capable protectors and providers, and even better nurturers than women, as they have the greater strength to care for the whole family more effectively than a woman can for her babies. Excelling in a certain trait makes you more capable in many things. Therefore, with a particular trait, you can achieve more than others. This is why men have traditionally taken on critical roles such as protecting, providing, and caring for families in general, while women stayed home to nurture infants. Protecting and providing for a wife and children is more important than nurturing infants, as infants are easier to care for compared to adults (women).

[JessyJoy]

@Shiprex Reasons:

Incest: Immediate concerns is incest and the more significant issue is the long-term genetic health of the population.

A community with a severely skewed gender ratio, like a couple of men and 100 women, would face difficulties and the most obvious one is perhaps incest. Even if incest is avoided, the lack of genetic diversity would still lead to inbreeding depression in a long term anyway, causing more genetic disorders and fertility issues. The group would also be super vulnerable to external threats since a single of a couple of men couldn't defend against other groups or nations. Socially, the dynamics would be weird and unstable, leading to psychological problems and conflict. The emotional toll on both men and women would be huge due to isolation and pressure. The reproductive burden on the few men would be massive, and managing pregnancies and childcare without enough male support could harm child health. Additionally, tasks like resource management and agriculture might suffer without enough men, leading to long-term sustainability issues and potential population decline.

[Shiprex]

@JessyJoy
First off LIFE is the ability to perform basic life functions of metabolism, respiration, and carry out respiration and excretion.
REPRODUCTION on the other hand is something that cells can do in the simple sense that they can create more of themselves. So by the gametes coming to a situation where fertilisation can happen it requires both those cells TO BE LIVING in the first place and in the same place at the same time so by that it's only possible for that to occur, men and women need to get together (as it's only in very few circumstances where chimera humans may be able to self fertilise but this is not normal).
As for being stronger and more capable of doing more things at a higher level, that's not an argument

The point about how men are viewed as expendable within a society because only few are needed to sustain a population that is also reinforced by the very nature of the first argument PROTECTOR. That a population will LOSE males to conflict thus making fewer males able to maintain diversity of the population. And why is diversity such an important goal?

It has also been the case that the majority of men do not reproduce but the majority of women do. I think the ration is around 4 men to 8 women who actively pass on their genetics to future generations. The 2 to 100 ratio would perhaps create potential after a few generations but maybe a 1 to 10 or 1 to 8 would reduce risks within a population of risks associated with in breeding. The main argument against incest is that of the moral component as there was likely a lot of it going on in early human communities.

[JessyJoy]

@Shiprex The 2 to 100 ratio will slow down civilization extremely and incest or even DNA -linked diseases would be rampant and there will be deaths here and there anyway. No civilization has this ratio in genders.

It is extremely wrong to say that 2 men are needed. Even 20 is wrong. Perhaps 25/100 is doable since a man has the potential to take care of up to 4 women and their children. A woman cannot take care of a man. Just like a child cannot take care of a parent than the other way round.

And even then, 25/100 men/women ratio is still questionable because the nation with this ratio will be susceptible by external threats easier than compared to 25/100 women/men ratio. Not to mention the bloom of economy and civilization in general would be in turmoil if you would have 25/100 men/women. A 100/25 ratio in men/women would be much safer and guaranteed to bloom. Not to mention a man can live alone easier than a woman (because of obvious biological advantages men have, testosterone is just one of them)

[Shiprex]

@JessyJoy
If it's a society then a man can reproduce with as many women as he can as long as the society were taking care of them. The notion of this being some kind of moral society is out the window and it would just be about getting folk out collecting food not just being mothers and PROVIDERS. It's perfectly possible for women to grow food and farm the land just as men can procreate as often as needed then go out and get food for everyone. Women are more than just baby farmers.

[lil_will_12]

@JessyJoy “A woman cannot take care of a man. Just like a child cannot take care of a parent” this is extremely misogynistic coded, and is from a very old ideology, in which men believed women to have the intelligence of a child, and therefore had only the rights of a child. Some of these views are still unfortunately common in the middle east. I have a hard time believing you aren't a blue in disguise. The way you say men have “biological advantages” really only truly applies to physical strength. Men on average, have better physical strength than women. This is pretty much where i draw the line between obvious advantages a gender has over the other. The rest of advantages are not solely in a gender, but in the individual themself.

[JessyJoy]

@Shiprex Sure, but men can produce faster since they are biologically build better than us. A man does not go infertile after a long constant labor as fast as a woman does.

[Shiprex]

@JessyJoy
I hear and agree with you but don't approve of the "built better" notion. Women are built to grow babies and nurture them as well as create a pleasant and comfortable place for a man to return to. THAT is built for a better purpose than working to provide

[JessyJoy]

@Shiprex Just as a man that is built to impregnate us. And yes, women nurture their children but that is pale in comparison of a man that provides and protects his wife and his children. A man is also a comfortable as well as a safe place for a woman to return to.

Please do not turn to a simp. Most women who live by nature would disrespect you.

[Shiprex]

@JessyJoy I'm out of the whole simp and provider notion. That's a sailed and sunk ship

[JessyJoy]

@Shiprex Are you from USA?

[Shiprex]

@JessyJoy
Eastern Scandinavia but originally Northern Britain

[Anonymous]

I would choose who I am. Are there disadvantages to being a woman? Obviously yes, but there are also disadvantages to being a man. I love being a woman and I can't imagine being a man and dealing with some of the pressures they have.

[JessyJoy]

Woman. Because worldwide, men die more from dangerous hazards, wars and just in general by any danger.

[TwoToTooTutu2]

I once thought the same thing like you when I was younger too. But I grew out of it.

I would remain a man since it is who I am.

[chocolatetwopointo]

wdym?

[TwoToTooTutu2]

I used to think life would be easier as a woman. But we all have our cross to bear.

[chocolatetwopointo]

so u understand now that women do have it harder? got it

[TwoToTooTutu2]

I would not agree. I believe life is equally hard for everyone.

[wkhan_87]

You are right men life is some easier than a woman life , but not all men leave their partner pregnant. You are blaming wrong here.

[moneymagnet24]

I agree with you always men
To hell with world I can do whatever I want to do 💪

[Agape93]

Man.

[chocolatetwopointo]

why?

[Agape93]

Much less likely to be raped or molested, lower expectations, having kids is easier and you don't get penalized for having them, aggression isn't stigmatized etc.

[chocolatetwopointo]

valid

[Anonymous]

I am disgusted by the male body. I would like to be a woman again.

[ChicoFromThe305]

Salty much lol, I choose man tho

[chocolatetwopointo]

why?

[ChicoFromThe305]

Cause it's all I know

[Anonymous]

It's easier to be a woman.

[chocolatetwopointo]

elaborate

[Opinion Owner]

Most people treat women better, it's easier for them to get a date, and many other things.

[chocolatetwopointo]

what makes u think that? and thats the only thing u want in life? a date? say some of the other things.

[Opinion Owner]

Life experience makes me think that. Women can also get a better job than me, just another personal experience.

[chocolatetwopointo]

better than u? okay so a woman could never ever be better than u? ever thought of that?

[Opinion Owner]

That's what I'm saying, it's better to be a woman.

[chocolatetwopointo]

so u think that she got the job bc she's a woman? did it ever occur to u that she might have better qualifications? better education?

[Opinion Owner]

No, I think she got the job because she was hot. I would give her the job too.

[chocolatetwopointo]

ah ok so become hot then.

[chocolatetwopointo]

key word ”think” she probably had better qualifications, thats why.

[Opinion Owner]

Nope, she had only high school, I have a college diploma.

[Opinion Owner]

So how can I "become hot", do I need a magic wand?

[chocolatetwopointo]

depends how bad it is

[Opinion Owner]

Yup, I need a magic wand.

[_Autumn_]

What's your problem?

[chocolatetwopointo]

men, isn't that obvious?💀

[_Autumn_]

There's nothing harder than being a man

[chocolatetwopointo]

LMAO okay please elaborate💀

[_Autumn_]

Honestly, being a man is not that easy. On one hand, everyone says "men should be strong, emotionless, they should be able to do everything," and on the other hand, they tell you to "show your feelings." Come on, you’ve got to be like a rock on one hand, and then show all your emotions all the time on the other! It doesn’t work like that. Whenever something happens, the responsibility is always on you, like the whole world is on your shoulders. And you have to always be strong, so nobody tells you "let me help you." You can’t be fragile, that’s not an option. But if you come and ask us "why aren't you emotional," just take a step back for a second. Being a man kind of feels like that.

[chocolatetwopointo]

oh come on, that was last said in the 90s, nowadays anyone can be how emotional they want.
how is the responsebility always on men? why can't u accept help? seems like ur problem tbh.
ah wow ur most difficult problem is ur FEELINGS. wow. such a problem😐

[_Autumn_]

It is in a man's nature to be strong. Weak, emotional men are not accepted

[chocolatetwopointo]

yes they are 🤦‍♀️ apparently its also in ur nature to be attracted to kids, according to men.

[_Autumn_]

You don't understand the difficulties of being a man because you are not a man

[chocolatetwopointo]

bc being told ur not supposted to cry is not difficult. hang out with people who accept u crying then,

[_Autumn_]

[chocolatetwopointo]

thats cute

[MasterKS]

LMAO!

[chocolatetwopointo]

what?

[MasterKS]

@chocolatetwopointo your question made me laugh. sorry!

[chocolatetwopointo]

am i wrong?💀

[MasterKS]

@chocolatetwopointo if my girlfriend gets pregnant, ill js leave! so easy! you judging male so easily.

[chocolatetwopointo]

do u think its wrong?

[MasterKS]

@chocolatetwopointo No but everyone is not like that.

[chocolatetwopointo]

here he goes ”not all men” god im tired of y'all