Is nature sexist?

[Anonymous]

Men are valued for intelligence, ambition, passion, honesty, power, influence, social status, humor, loyalty and physical attractiveness.

Women are valued for physical attractiveness, kindness, nurturing nature, unselfishness, modesty, honesty and loyalty.

Those facts are considered by some to be "sexism", but it seems to me it's just human nature.

Thoughts?

[SueShe]

Wow, I think you made a magistral mistake with your male adjectives.

Honesty, loyalty and physical attractiveness is not really what most males have been blessed with, in particular honesty and loyalty. They are everything but...

The same applies for a number of women. Honesty and loyalty is a thing of the past.

As soon as you are member of one of those pickup and hookup sites, you are no longer honest and loyal because most, if not all of those on those dating apps, cheat with the looks and the descriptive.

It is not nature that is sexist, it is those that give those unrealistic attributes to each gender.

[Asker]

Wow, what an honor it is to get a reply from biggest misandrist and prude in GAG's history.

I didn't read it, by the way.

[Anonymous]

There is nothing sexist about the fact that men and women are different.

[Asker]

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

This question just spotlights the absurdity of the extent to which the term sexism has been overused.

[Asker]

Yeup.