Guys, would you be more interested in a girl you had an intense chemistry with but lower compatibility or lower chemistry but high compatibility?

[Anonymous]

Guys, interested to know which girl would you go for more and why?

1) Very attractive, lots of intense chemistry with, passionate, lower compatibility.

Or

2) More of a plain Jane, not so much chemistry, but you get on, high compatibility

High chemistry, lower compatibility

Low chemistry, higher compatibility

A total of 8 votes were cast: 1 girls and 7 guys. See detailed results

[NicholasRedone]

Even I find this question hard. Usually if it's like that a woman or a man (looking at their opposite gender attraction above per your poll) will make a judgement call - is there something about one or the other that catches the eye 👀 👁️ and are they worth it.

If I was to be more blunt I heard a joke once about a man telling his son "there were two wonderful women each with great personalities I didn't know how to pick them apart - who became your mother - so I picked the woman with the bigger breasts". 🤭 The same could be said for any physical feature, or "I picked the redhead, because redheads are my thing over blondes"

Or "her blue eyes stood out from all the green eyes ladies" 😨

[NicholasRedone]

I still haven't voted above 😘😘😘

[NicholasRedone]

People realistically want to have it all or as close as to it as possible in both areas 👀👀👀

[Anonymous]

😆😆😆 chemistry? You mean when a woman is attracted to him. Because that is the ONLY thing that matters. Guys with many many options might weigh the two. But generally for you're avg. guy he's relegated to the few woman that give him a chance. It would be nice to say a guy considers compatibility. But the reality is that is a luxury that most guys do not have.

[Asker]

Haha I mean more than that just attracted.

I mean you can have two women attracted to him, but it’s more the mutual physical and emotional intensity he has with one of them in particular eg intense chemistry. I mean theoretically speaking if you could pick one.

Haha I appreciate maybe some guys don’t get many women their way though. 🤣

[Opinion Owner]

Well I got news for you buttercup. If you don't have attraction you don't have anything else that follows.
A guy that has two women isn't worrying about the things you're talking about, because he has two women. I see your mistake. You're trying to apply woman logic to men. It doesn't work is all.

[Asker]

So how does he decide between the two of them then? Knowing that they won’t want to be two timed.

[Opinion Owner]

Well that all depends on the guy. Some guys WILL two timed. To some guys women are a game. To some guys women are human beings same as them.

[Nikki1989]

Both options have the potential for a total fail.

[Asker]

Very true, none are full proof.

[Shiprex]

I THINK the notion of compatibility would encompass the notion of higher chemistry though so this kind of mixes up the query.

[Asker]

But sometimes you can be super attracted to someone and have chemistry but then you ge to know them and think eh no based on compatibility

[Shiprex]

Absolutely, you could get really into someone's style and visage and that the physical attraction is there but they could be dull as dishwater and have zero to them that would keep you interested in anything other than physical intimacy.
This is something many guys would be able to reconcile with by having a ONS with a woman they met up with in a bar or club.

[serious]

Hypothetically speaking for me it will be option B. Low chemistry but high compatibility.

[Anonymous]

As long as she's dominant, she is partially compatible. And if I like her, I'll adapt to her personality.

[jahaims]

Chemistry is part of compatibility so your question doesn't make sense.

[Asker]

Not always, you might be super attracted to something and have chemistry but then they open their mouth and you’re like eh no.,,