When will science go back to being actual science?

[strateguy632]

Science writers rely on mocking and readers' blind faith to write the craziest crap... very very often... just today i did a carbon 14 search and got my "personalized" google search results... they noticed i doubted evolution so... flooded me with the evolution websites that CHANGED the "story" from paper encyclopedias... so i preserve a screenshot of the digital stuff getting CORRUPTED with letter p, these days by atheists who believe "no god can punish us for lies so lets lie and corrupt websites," so i preserve before they can change what science taught in picture

What the smurf is this crap about "spontaneus" and "random" decay?

The stuff they corrupted and will soon change digital britanica too... because carbon dating DOES date stuff 8000 years old and is trusted except for dinosaur... because DID date several dinosaurs at 30 THOUSAND years! and any half life longer than 1,000 years was NEVER OBSERVED whether carbon 14 or argon! So...

When will science change back from evolution bullies and lies, to change back to observation?

[Chazmatazz269]

Unless you’re doing your own research, it’s not wise to trust any sources without question.
Like it or not, science is expensive. So the results you find are 100% dependent upon what the people and organizations paying for it want you to “know”.
Did you chase the “Grievance Studies Affair” rabbit?
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00491241211009946

https://youtu.be/kVk9a5Jcd1k?si=bJqIcEBnjRX3Olfa

This clip is one of many you can find on youtube regarding this specific challenge to the integrity of modern science publishing and reporting. Those same kats went on at least half a dozen podcasts to disseminate what they learned through their experiences in academia. Obviously only outlying podcasts would have them because the mainstream media didn’t dare contribute to the veracity of their findings.
It’s kind of mind blowing the first time you work through it.

[DJB72]

If I'm doing any serious research, be it theological or scientific, I trust books printed prior to 1995 over anything electronic because you can find older editions saying exactly the same thing. If it's been changed the new edition tends to cite the sources for the revisions and it's NEVER current government policy or to be more "inclusive"

[zagor]

Uh, evolution is BASED on observation. And it is still happening today.

[strateguy632]

Tragic how easily you are fooled by misleading words... they use the same word "evolution" for several different things.

[strateguy632]

For example "evolution" can mean a moth changed from black to white when less ash to hide on. Meaning the black ones got eaten and white ones hid and survived.
Then they also lie "evolution means" parents with 120 chromosomes can have a child with 26 chromosomes... and if you doubt "evolution " they say "you can't deny the first one" when they are still A MOTH.