Men shouldn’t provide for women, do you agree?

Question

I have actually become liberal, I think it is so outdated!

Why should men work so hard for a girl and ‘worship’ her when she’s been with men before etc… like no girl is traditional anyway, so why should any man be traditional for women?

I used to want to be a provider, I’m so glad I matured. Like no girl is going to use me, it is such an unfair exchange.

Women got their own money and can do what they like with it, don’t come asking for ours.

AnonCuriousGuy · Accepted Answer

I like to say two things about this topic.

1) There is a lot of tradition females out there. Just because social media and main stream media buff out one sided stories doesn't mean there ain't a lot of tradition people there - also outside the west you find a TON. So if you are WILLING to search then search

2) Now your statement seems fair like why should l pay for her if she been with multiple guys. This in itself l agree to some extent but the problems aligns when we make everything a compare game.

All l am saying is if we don't guard our eyes and all then little by little we criticise the other gender to the point of collecting a whole list of dos and don'ts. Basically put... Its not love and you may be single hating or disliking the other gender. Judge based on the here and now on the person you dating not the whole.

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

First of all no if a man makes more than a woman he should provide for her is bs. Now if he wants to that’s fine, that’s between them. I guarantee that dude who said that about making more than a woman ain’t going to say well if she makes more than him she should take care of him. A lot of stuff is outdated. If women are going to expect this, that and being treated equal to men than all these outdated traditions need to be tossed out the door. Don’t pick and choose when it benefits them. If you don’t want to provide for a woman that’s completely up to you. Save your money, build your wealth. Like the saying goes. When a man gets a girlfriend he goes broke. When a girl gets. Boyfriend she gets rich.

4ngelic · Accepted Answer

yea, but they already don't. almost no one provides in the west for women in the 21st century, and only gold diggers and ultra religious conservative women want it anyways.

even though you're coming to that opinion because of redpill brainrot, it's a good idea to not want to be a provider. only wealthy men could provide comfortably anyways if they wanted to nowadays. it's not feasible for ordinary people, and there's no reason to do it anyways. it only made sense when women couldn't work or only had limited mostly part time poorly payed jobs.

DishLady · Accepted Answer

Nothing philosophically extreme is ever good.

AngryCarl3 · Answer

My take is a little more nuanced. I would say men shouldn't provide for women who contribute nothing to the relationship. As long as a woman looks after the little ones, produces more little ones, cooks and keeps the cave clean then it's fine for a man to provide for her.

LazerBean · Answer

If that's how you see it, then you never were traditional. Just a LARPer.  Today, men and women can simply choose if they want to be traditional or not.

katiesmuff · Answer

I don't think women should be depending on men for support in most cases and that with some exceptions the woman should be carrying part of the load as well.

Telekinetic-Potato · Answer

I think there was a time and place where that made sense but it's not right now and it's definitely not in America

MissSunshine2 · Answer

I think where possible, everyone should provide for themselves, but it’s ok to help each other.

Likes2drive · Answer

If they wanted to be treated as equals and they work full-time, then there’s no reason for us to be providing for them, but if you want a traditional wife or girlfriend, then they seem to still want you to provide for them

Nikki1989 · Answer

Only the usual blue anon trolls will fall for this juvenile clickbait.

Vegasrunner · Answer

I don't see an issue with providing for women as long as she falls in line. I think the issue is that women want you to provide and expect to do what they want when they want. That won't work.

Mike_Hum · Answer

Imagine how pathetic you have to be to see a relationship as a financial transaction.

Xoirwinkan · Answer

If you get married and you get her pregnant you need to provide for her, otherwise you're a scumbag.

Chthou95 · Answer

I agree. We're in 2026 and women are strong independent women. They don't need a man for anything. Don't help these women fellas

beefcakebradybatson · Answer

If the man makes more than the woman, he should.

MemeSupreme · Answer

just ragebait on reddit instead lol

Abbycado · Answer

You will never have to worry about this.

DryGermanGuy · Answer

Go and cry elsewhere, gaylord.

CindyRuns · Answer

I'm perfectly capable of providing for myself

MrChinaski · Answer

Love is a partnership. It always was.

Anonymous · Answer

Welcome back again lol

TonyMetal___86 · Answer

Only provide if the woman is a housewife!

Shrimpenjoyer · Answer

Everything must be 50/50

Anonymous · Answer

I usually prefer independent women.

Tungi · Answer

Yeah women can provide for themselves

Hispanic-Cool-Guy · Answer

For your wife, yes.

Men shouldn’t provide for women, do you agree?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Men shouldn’t provide for women, do you agree?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

We're glad to see you liked this post.