Straight sexuality is ok to show children but homosexuality being shown to children is suddenly so deplorable and disgusting?
Batman being bi = disgusting and pushing the gay agenda on children?
Literally any other character that’s straight kissing = perfectly fine to show to children?
It seems like the gay agenda isn’t the thing that exist, maybe the heterosexual agenda trying so hard to suppress anything even resembling the lgbtq community to not be shown because they’re scared people will find out that lgbtq people exist 🤔 ?
Updates
+1 y
Superman*
Why do people continue to fake complain about the “gay agenda” being forced on children?
The norm of human existence is heterosexuality. As a child, I had no idea homosexuality existed. It never occurred as a thought. Because I had a father & mother, it made perfect sense that a man is with a woman. This is the only natural way to conceive children. I had a natural aversion to homosexuality once it was introduced to me by others. Nobody in my family or among my friends is homophobic. It's just that the sight of it was revolting for me. So had I seen it in a cartoon, it'd be a negative experience. I had no problem with heterosexuality being in cartoons & movies because, once again, my parents existed. Equally, transexuality only came into existence for me once someone else told me about its existence. Never did I have any thought about this being a possibility. Indeed, other than mental experiences, throughout 99.99% of human history it has been impossible to physically alter sex. As a consequence, neither homosexuality nor transexuality will exist in the average child's mind if never exposed to them. Heterosexuality will because this is the limitation placed upon human reproduction: only a man & a woman: a father & a mother. Learning about the existence of these alternate sexualities has actually not benefited me in any conceivable way. Quite the opposite: learning about these abnormalities (homosexuality, transexuality, pedophilia, polygamy, incest, etc) was generally quite disturbing or confusing for me. So having overtly gay characters would have distraught me quite a lot as a child. The only reason I am more okay with it now is because it has been forced into my sight so much that I no longer react much the same way. However, the same is true with other things I found distressing. For example, corpses. Try being a history-addict without seeing corpses in documentaries, photographs, or artwork. It is bound to happen and it did. Of course now it doesn't evoke the same reaction as it did in the past. But in actuality, this doesn't mean the object of distress became something my mind accepts as good. Exposure to non ordinary-heterosexuality at a young age was definitely damaging for me. It fucked with my mind a lot to learn these things. Heterosexuality (non-incest & similar both people at a similar age) never bothered me a single time. The only thing that could bother me was if one person was forcing the other. Ex: Stealing a kiss. As this would extend to any sexuality, it isn't related to heterosexuality, therefore is about the force-aspect, not the sexual one. In conclusion, from my personal experience, it is best not to introduce these concepts until at least around the age of puberty, which is realistically when some sort of sexual interest arises in kids (turning into teenagers). "But heterosexuality can harm a kid too". Yeah, well, 95%+ of kids will grow up to be heterosexual. If we're choosing whom to potentially harm, going by absolute numbers, it makes most sense to have heterosexual characters who will be representative of the relationships (parents, grandparents, etc) 95% of kids will already know about from birth, by virtue of existence in a sex-binary world.
I just do not care what is in the media.. My biggest issue is when they take a straight character. One that has been straight since its inception, and turn them bi or gay, or even trans. Please if you're going to do that create your own characters, don't steal from the original creators. Even my favorite openly gay actor, George Takei, was pissed off that his character, Sulu, was portrayed as gay in the latest star trek movie. He said that when they do that to existing characters, suddenly they become their sexuality and stop being a character.
Again I do not care if there are gay characters, I do not care if there is gay stuff on screen, I do care when they steal a character, turn them gay, and expect those of us that have been fans for decades to be ok with it. Come up with something original, or dont do it at all. Even the heads of most of the comic book houses (DC and Marvel specifically) state that they regret injecting woke bullshit into their comics, because it cause at HUGE decrease in people interested in them. Not kidding in the last decade alone comic book purchases have decreased by 80%.. Take Playboy adding gay men to their nudes.. Or removing nudity all together.. They have lost hundreds of millions of dollars over that. Take the all female Ghost busters, Not only was it ultra woke, it was just HORRIBLE. And it flopped so utterly horribly that they had to play fan service in the next one or it would never see another movie made... Or worst of all, Gillette and their woke commercial insulting and shaming men.. they lost 8 BILLION Dollars on that.. Yes BILLION.. Not million, Not thousand.. The VAST majority of society is so sick of woke bullshit that the term Get Woke, Go Broke is not only a thing. Its very much real.
Things where they did diversity and woke right? Take the most recent Dark tower movie.. The gunslinger was supposed to be an old white man, kind of like Clint Eastwood.. But Idris Elba got the role and he absolutely killed in it. It was awesome!.. Or the most recent DUNE movie. Liet Kynes. Again supposed to be a man according to the books, But the lady they put in his place was amazing.. Diversity and woke done right..
We already know that LGBTQ exists BECAUSE of things such as this. It's becoming a forced thing. Being shoved into places just so it exists there, instead of actually having a space created. That's what annoys me. And I'm not talking about this because I haven't seen this show or whatever it is. I mean in general. I'm talking about watching a show and having a random gay character/scene seemingly thrown into the mix in an awkward fashion all in the name of "inclusion". It's the same thing done with diversity. When done correctly it's fine. But it's seldom ever done correctly. It's usually very tacky and over the top. And in some places it's just not needed. Like in children's shows.
469 opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic.
I think rather than having bad influence on kids as most parents suspect, I feel that we should have gay characters shown to them so they learn from an early age that it's okay not to be heterosexual, it's fine as long as you love the other person. And even if they aren't homosexual themselves, they may turn out to be well rounded people who are in support of freedom and the fact love exists in all forms.
I think mostly religious people have a problem with gay rep cuz it's be turning the kids against them by making them question if God made them flawed or they're criticized based on human society laws.
Of course they’re going to try and keep it away from there life they’re afraid of their kids catching it. When I was young I’d say I was fairly homophobic until I met someone that became a friend of mine nothing sexual as a matter of fact we weren’t enemies but we stayed clear of each other and he use to joke around with everybody about sex stuff like play flirt but he never acted that way with me even after we became friends he died from aids a couple of years after I met him he was a good friend to everyone I’m telling this little story because my point is times are changing and people are learning to be more accepting of others and as each generation comes along it’s gonna continue getting better the hate has to stop all the hate whites hating blacks blacks hating whites straight people hating gay people and gay people hating straight people regardless if you have every reason under the sun to hate them all you’re doing is keeping the hate alive people are who they are period it doesn’t matter if by choice or born that way they’re no different than you except for possibly being misguided or just plain ignorant but to stop the hate we have to stop hating and I can’t be mad at you for hating me if I hate you you’re just chasing your own tail because nobody wins
Exactly. How does society expect humans to advance when we are still persecuting homosexuals, being racist, sexist, etc. it’s just slowing down progress !!
Just because we did it in the past doesn’t make it any better, the same individuals that flame the past was better are the same that hate when people critique past wrong doings 🤔 there are correlations lol
I myself would not classify this as a heterosexual agenda. I would classify it as the morality police of the heterosexual community. That sounds a little better. It is always that judges say your lifestyles is immoral but mine's okay so the whole world should follow my lifestyle and tries to force it on them. It's much like politics you have two parties both thinks their way is the only way and both trying to ram their way down your throat. It's the same way with my lifestyle. I am a nudist however there are no nude beaches nudist areas around because we have the morality police of the Christian community that says body shame is the way to go and that the human body is vulgar and offensive. What could be more natural than going all natural? In all walks of life you're going to have the judgmental people out there who institute their mortality that's what's right and what's wrong when in fact they are just judgmental control freaks that turn into big babies when they don't get their way
@fantasticass that sounds like absolute heaven to Me. To me not having to wear clothes is the ultimate freedom and I love being free free of life's burdens and free of society's judgement. I live way the hell up in northern Wisconsin where I'm surrounded by a town full of judgmental people that are very much unaccepting of anything but the lifestyle they've been taught to lead and then we have the one of the fakes the wanabe's that claim to be part of a lifestyle but know nothing of what they're claiming to be part of. I wish there was some way to take over a small lake and turned it into a open to the public nudist or clothing optional and see how many people would actually attend
1.3K opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic.
It's not fake though anyone who complains about it 99% of the time is just a person who is ageist anyone who is not straight.
It's very clear as more open we become with it, more it has started showing up and been portrayed by fictional characters. Therefore it's not a fake.
The only thing i don't like is when basically If i was to create a straight female character as some major character that got popularised you can 100% bet someone would try to make fan version or even a company taking my work shifting that character to be a gay icon and gay herself. Or when it's really obvious they created a character just to pander to some group of people.
This all comes from me been a creator myself in stories and characters of course. And i have a big passion to character design were i don't want them been just a thing we have to pander to a group. The way they are written should be the way it is. It's hard to tell though what intensions are behind a writer if they are just creating a character out of pandering but it does happen and sometimes it's really obvious and sometimes it's not. So that becomes a thing. Normally it's super easy to tell in films though.
Most men are naturally grossed out by seeing homosexual men but most women dont have this type of reaction to any homosexuality. They even did a science experiment to understand why some people have this revulsion to homosexuality. I personally as man physically feel stupid sick whenever i see male homosexuality but not female homosexuality. I don't have anything against the gay men themselves but i can't help but get grossed out when i do see it. The only thing i do not like is when tv shows blatantly put the homosexual relationship on the spot light in your face over and over and over and OVER AGAIN! Its ok we fucking get it THEY ARE GAY can we move on with the tv show and the stpry now? Another thing i also dislike is when they change the sexuality of the character for no reason other than to show they are gay. They change years of character development and it adds absolutely nothing of value to the story only so they can virtue signal how great they are. It is an insult to all superman fans and LGBT everywhere in my personal opinion.
942 opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic.
Ok imagine this. Because people nowadays celebrate LGBT, giving them a big parades, making what they identify so special and with kid's small brains, do you think they'd rather be straight? It seemed to me that now a days, a lot of teens maybe pretending to be gays just to feel special. I'm gonna give you an anecdote like you always do. I know many who were once straight but then their boy/girlfriend cheated so they stopped loving the opposite sex and decided to be lesbian/gays posting more gay stuff getting more LGBT followers and sympathy making them feel more secured because of their mentality "im straight so I'm probably not special" So it's kinda like they're doing it for security and you know kids fall for that easily and how people's self esteem these days are getting so low. And there's a big reason why we're most straight. We can't repopulate the world if we're all gays and if that even happen, I'm pretty sure you'd hate it if there's a straight pride parade going on for the sake of those kids feeling guilty for being straight.
343 opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic.
I’m bi so obviously I’ve got no issue with gay characters it just feels like there’s been a lot of shoehorning gay dynamics into movies where they don’t make sense. It feels like virtue signalling and pandering rather than being just a feature of some of the characters which makes it a spectacle rather than showing a meaningful connection between lovers.
This is similar to how Hollywood handles stories of people of colour and trans people as well. It because the only/main interesting part of that characters background/story rather than just being a part of it. I find television in the UK does a lot better job of this, John Barrowman’s role in Dr Who/Torchwood being a good example of a bisexual character for example. It comes up periodically when he pursues a man but isn’t the main trait/feature of his character which would make him very 2 dimensional.
When I was in school heterosexuality was never pushed. It was never discussed. The closest it came was in biology when teaching the functions of males and females in the reproductive cycle.
Why is it now necessary to introduce the LGBTQ lifestyle in school? It is coming across as indoctrination. It's acceptable to have the rainbow flag in the classroom room and wear pro LGBTQ t-shirts. Wear a pro hetero t-shirt and get sent to the principal's office for disrupting class by wearing an offensive garment.
Children should be learning life skills like reading, arithmetic and science.
here is another study that points out the link between homosexuality and being abused as a child (either sexual or physical) the study goes on to say it is difficult to prove a causal link but certainly something is there www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535560/
This is false. Homosexuality is not listed as a mental disorder by the World Health Organization. Also animals in the wild show homosexuality too. So to say it's not natural is again false.
@007kingifrit you also seem weird, like how are you going to act like a gay person being molested as a child is there fault. That’s really fucked up if that’s what your saying, it’s fucked up if you think the gay people who are victims of child molestation are more harmful than literal child milestors.
Not only that but most gay people are extremely disenfranchised but of course you’d rather ignore that to stay in your prejudice beliefs and mindset.
Not only that but your data’s shit, apparently you don’t read how they gather there data.. because your study was only done on 942 people and they only did gay men. Which is an extremely small sample, in reality Nearly 80 percent of the men who molested little boys were heterosexual or bisexual and most of these men were married and had children of their own.
Not only that but you’re a psycho if you think a persons sexuality has to do with childhood trauma and that they’re somehow defective for a situation they couldn’t control
People don’t do measured studies on the victims sexual orientation for a reason, however over the world many horrible things such as “corrective rape”
Which specifically targets lgbtq individuals, where disgusting people that think like you go and rape boys and girls Just for having a sexual identity you don’t agree with.
The funniest part is you don’t even read your own sources. The article that supposedly supports your argument clearly states
“While point estimates suggest much of the association between maltreatment and sexual orientation may be due to the effects of maltreatment on sexual orientation, confidence intervals were wide. Our results suggest that causal relationships driving the association between sexual orientation and childhood abuse may be bidirectional, may differ by type of abuse, and may differ by sex. Better understanding of this potentially complex causal structure is critical to developing targeted strategies to reduce sexual orientation disparities in exposure to abuse.”
Notice how this study is trying to reduce the disparities between exposure to abuse between sexual orientation, the study also states
“While point estimates suggest much of the association between maltreatment and sexual orientation may be due to the effects of maltreatment on sexual orientation, confidence intervals were wide. Our results suggest that causal relationships driving the association between sexual orientation and childhood abuse may be bidirectional”
Your study literally states it isn’t complete, your study has too small of a sample size to have any real results yet you use it as an example? I wonder why.. stop being disingenuous
@doopayo i didn't say it was their fault. i said it happened. but that means they aren't really gay its just the manifestation of trauma and a learned behavior
i don't believe in gay people. its not an identity. its a phase or a learned response to suffering
experts are no longer trustworthy. the WHO and APA are invalid sources to know about gays. they are corrupted by activism (international groups are never trusted)
@007kingifrit so they didn't gave the correct information at at time no one knew very well what we were up against? Such a crime. See how they acted after it had become a global pandemic. But the consider body dysmorphia a disease. With that my guess is that you already agree. We are talking about the World Health Organization. Their disease knowledge is not something we can dispute.
Yes they are. I know you rather believe conspiracy theories for your views of the world to make sense, but yes we can. And again, homosexuality present in animals is literally been proven over and over. Not a debate.
@This_Is_My_Opinion8 their intenral documents reveal they lied. they KNEW they were giving false information and they were fine with this. you are such a sheep. all international organizations and authorities of truth from the old world are untrustworthy
@This_Is_My_Opinion8 the agenda is simply to feel good. to remove all negativity. to abolish all judgement and blame and cosnequences and think of everyone as equal
the most childish worldview ever. to abolish truth in the name of no hurt feelings
@007kingifrit they have so such agenda. And truth is homosexuality is not a disease. Is perfectly natural and normal. You are the one who sounds like you don't want to accept the truth.
I mean... every little tween your age labels themselves "bi" because it's trendy, even before they've sprouted their first pube and know what sexual attraction is.
And the problem isn't even that there's gay characters... it's that these studios retroactively rewrite characters a century old.
The shoehorning of gay characters is amusing too. Like... when there's less straight characters than anything else when in reality the overwhelming majority of people are straight. Storytelling should be about storytelling, not revisioning the world the way you want it to be.
Exactly. I have no problem with publishers creating a „Fagman“ comic series or whatever, I don’t have to buy it. But leave the old characters and storylines alone!
Oh, I know teens aren't the smartest people around... but the fact that it's trendy to be lgbt is a product of the culture, not of teens figuring out something new to be stupid about.
441 opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic.
The issue isn't having a gay superhero. Stan Lee created characters - especially in the X-Men comics - to highlight social issues for over 50 years.
The issue is taking a well established character and changing the fundamental core to fit the current social pressure.
There's a joke about a guy of 98 who goes to the British Embassy in Australia to ask about emigration out of Oz.
The clerk asks why.
He replies when he was born they hanged people for homosexuality. By the time he was a teenager it's penalty was life with hard labour. In his 20s it was 30 years, by the time he was 50 it was ten years.
When he was 65 it was a fine and a suspended sentence. At 75 it was decriminalised and gay marriage had now been accepted.
The clerk says "so why would that be an issue?"
The aged man sighs and looks at him over his glasses.
"I just want out before it's compulsory"
4
0 Reply
Anonymous
(36-45)
+1 y
Fake complain yeah I don’t believe those complaints are fake at all, when you have someone calling you a homophobic because you reject them because you yourself are straight and in a relationship and have been in a relationship with a guy for the past 5 years complaining that they are trying to force their gayness onto is not someone fake complaining
I’ve also been attacked in an eating disorder support group I was asked what I identify myself as and I said straight and I copped full on abuse for saying I was straight the person who asked the question and who is gay themselves came to my defence but than they had people turn on them and abuse them so if I complain about people trying to force their gay agenda onto people that is not me fake complaining
You mean like when that school board lied and said there were no complaints against a transgender kid with nuts... then later we found out the kid raped two girls and had been reported to authorities multiple times.
The reason I know there's a homosexual agenda is because the actual number of homosexuals is very low... a few percentage points. Yet when you watch many tv shows and movies it's 50-80% of the characters. If we replaced homosexual with say black americans doing the same thing, then 100% of all characters on tv in a country where they're like 13-15% of the population would be black yet you would claim there's no agenda at work. Get real.
Even if you were correct, it wouldn’t make an sense to make that argument. Media is meant to entertain, the entertainment value of a show isn’t determined based on how little lgbtq characters they have?
Another question is why are you so hell bent on the majority being represented in tv? Minorities exist so I could argue it’s disingenuous to only want the majority population to be represented all the time in media
As usual, you are misinformed. Your report is about ALL tv shows, including stuff made by random producers nobody's ever heard of that could be airing on some streaming 'channel' with only 100 viewers. But the reality when you look at big networks is: "Distribution of LGBTQ characters on broadcast networks in the 2020-21 season, by sexual orientation" -- 40% GAY! Only 5% straight. www.statista.com/.../
I am embarrassed for you because you are consistently on the wrong side of every issue I have ever seen you talk about.
"Even if you were correct, it wouldn’t make an sense to make that argument. Media is meant to entertain, the entertainment value of a show isn’t determined based on how little lgbtq characters they have?" -- Oh, really? You're the one claiming that there is no pro homosexual agenda. If the numbers are far outside of reality and historic numbers it does suggest an agenda with the intend of changing those numbers. Actually, I had zero problem with lgbt stuff till the agenda became clear.
"Another question is why are you so hell bent on the majority being represented in tv? Minorities exist so I could argue it’s disingenuous to only want the majority population to be represented all the time in media" -- That's not what I said... actually what I'm saying is that representation should be proportional to reality. Many years ago I argued against the show Fraiser not representing many Asians since I knew Seattle has a large Asian population. I don't care which race is represented but it's ridiculous and dishonest to be off the mark. It'd be like setting a show in Tokyo and claiming there's only 2 Asians in the whole city. But whatever.
Oh and I said 40% gay.. cause I was looking at the "homosexual" stat. If you add in the lesbians it's 75%. Add in the lesbians and it's 93%. Only 5% of the total are straight... and 4% are unknown.
because of homophobia. people love to complain about "how lgbtqia+ is forced upon society" as if we didn't grow up with unnecessary heterosexual couples in literally every fucking show/book and/or in public. like we also know that straight people exist yet you dont see us complaining about how media is forcing heterosexual relationships on us even though they're literally everywhere. lgbtqia+ people deserve representation too, plus its also more realistic, because not everyone is straight..
Literally and I don’t get how people think a gay person in a piece of media is “forcing homosexuality” like dude you can leave, not support the film, etc. it’s not that hard but they act like it’s the end of the world with their mental gymnastic justifications for homophobia and it’s just so weird to me 😂
lmao literally! like nobody is forcing them to watch nor is forcing homosexuality onto them? with their logic heterosexuality is being forced to us aswell lol. they're just looking for dumb reasons to hate on the lgbtqia+ community
Yup i even seen them get mad if a gay person says oh i ship 2 men together because they think they make a cute couple on tv. Claimin this is forcing the gay agenda.
But think it's perfectly fine to ship a male and female character together. It's literally the same thing.
But brainwashed people don't think clearly.
And the superman thing had me dying. All i heard was how could they turn superman gay!😡 Bruh, it's his son who is gay. A completely different fictional character. Keyword fictional They never get the facts right😂
"Straight sexuality is ok to show children but homosexuality being shown to children is suddenly so deplorable and disgusting?" Actually, call me old fashioned, but I don't think that any child who is still in primary school (<12 years old) needs to know all that much about sex full stop, and it doesn't matter whether it's "straight" or "gay" that we're discussing here. Maybe I'm unusual, but when I was so young I just didn't care about issues that bother adults so much. Know what I mean? We should just let children be children, and not burden them with crap like gender, race or the latest conspiracy theory about the environment. I mean, just look at how Ms. Thunberg turned out. She would have to be the most neurotic teenager I have ever seen.
First, because straight people generally find it gross. Gays can have gay media, but others don't have to like it, and it's dumb to try and inject it into the mainstream. We think it's nasty, get over it.
Second, because in the most prominent cases, it's a matter of hijacking a preexisting, beloved property, and crassly slapping a social agenda on top of it. You like Batman? Haha, he's bi now because we said so. Have you been invested in Superman and Lois Lane's relationship for decades? Oops, he's gay now, because something something social message. by the way Dumbledore is gay too, now, isn't that cool?
It's also annoying when a gay relationship seems to be inserted only for social justice points, and no storytelling reason whatsoever. But a new character that happens to be gay is way less annoying than when people hijack old stuff, because they're too incompetent to make something popular on their own.
How is it gross? I can list a million things that gross me out more than a same sex couple kissing.
Batman was a mistype, it was Superman’s son actually. And it’s canon according to marvel, either way marvels a multiverse if I’m not mistaken so there are several different versions of characters that are possible.
I understand a gay relationship being forced for fake brownie points though, that annoys most of the lgbtq community as well
It doesn't matter how it's gross. An instinctual disgust response needs no justification, it just is. And not everyone has it. But plenty do. The sky is blue, grass is green, and straight dudes don't like seeing two dudes kissing.
First, I am 100% opposed to the sexualization of children. Children don't need this. It should not be ANYONE's agenda to propagandize immature little children with this information, which they don't need, which would at that age just mess them up. And I have a message for the gay world! You're gay. Okay. So what? I am straight. I am NOT in your face with MY sexual orientation or proclivities. I DON'T WANT YOU IN MY FACE WITH YOURS! Your gay-ness is not necessary to bring up all the time. It should NOT be the most important thing about you , that everyone has to know right away! I don't care what your sexual orientation is. I don't want to know it.
Again, wondering how two adults kissing in a film has anything to do with sexual using children.
Let alone gay people kissing being “in your face” you have the option the close of the screen and look at something else so you can’t blame the gay community for your problems
I don't have problems, at least not with this. And I'm not blaming the gay community as a whole for anything. I'm talking about certain individuals who behave in a certain manner. I once had to attend a teachers' union meeting at which one particular lady seemed to feel a need to let us know, several times, what her sexual orientation is. It was completely gratuitous and unrelated to the topic under discussion. That's what I'm talking about. I respect Pete Buttigeig, for example, because like most people, straight or gay, he doesn't have to talk about it all the time. It has nothing to do with his job as Secretary of Transportation.
Hummm... loaded question. Trying to provoke something and I am not going to give it a voice or platform. Other than saying the future of the human race is dependent upon heterosexual relationships to produce the future generations and promote evolution of the human race.
I think that's why it was called being gay, because its a relationship between to people just having fun. Not saying its not real and fulfilling and meaningful... its just what it is and most people are tried of hearing about it all the time.
When I was growing up it was about not persecuting the lifestyle, but now it they want everyone to validate the life style... and my argument is that you don't need my validation and I am straight. So I am pro-straight... but not anti anything.
you have no idea what you are complaining about , you are thinking about something irrational , rationally. Heterosexual people irrationally want their kids to be heterosexual , Genetic. THIS is just as bad as telling a fag not to be a Fag. kids are an exception , and NO one will convince anyone otherwise.. and even if some agree 90% of those who agree and have kids are lying. this is straight psychology. Bigotry is ironically salvation for oneself. So you can complain.. but its not ever gonna change. not instinctively. its like telling whites to stop being white. you cannot tell heterosexuals to stop being heterosexual and wanting their kids to grow up and have kids. SO its not a farse. it is propaganda.. thats why most families who are not broken up are conservative.
I don't believe that same sex love relationships should be pushed onto children, I don't believe that children should be encouraged to act in this manner either, I don't think any type of sex should be encouraged to children, and I'm neither against or for gay people... I don't care if people of the same sex want to fuck the shit out of one another but I do think that batman shouldn't ever be portrayed as a gay because it's just not cool I also don't think that making batman or any other super heros black or whatever because of stupid shit that people can't get over, I mean if you think their should be more gay or black super heros then create a new one, I don't think white folks should feel guilty for being white, I think everybody should just be happy or fine with what they are and should all promote individualism, people shouldn't be influenced by other but should discover who they are on they're own and they should be okay with it but not promote it
And what’s so evil about same sex couples being represented on children’s television? How is it even encouraging children to quote on quote “act in this manner”. You’re also conflating sex with sexual orientation. Sexual orientation is just what you’re attracted to, in fact not showing children gay representation could harm your child in the future if they turn out to be gay. Everyone deserves to be represented, gay people are human beings just like straight people. They’re just stigmatized due to homophobia historically that is still holding back society till this day.
I’m also pretty sure it wasn’t actually Superman, it was his son and it was canon. and the rest seems like you’re just getting off topic
That "Bravo" I just wrote was addressed to FTnWo. This one of the reasons why my family no longer watches television. Sesame Street, for example, when it started back in the 1970s, was purely educational, teaching children numbers, the alphabet, how to count and starting out how to read! Later, apparently a new crowd took over, and now suddenly there was an agenda, to incorporate "social programming" about different sexual orientation, etc. Everything today has become politicized. I want education for children, NOT indoctrination, as seems to be happening now, and even, or especially, on college campuses!
