Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Topics (22) All
Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
63Opinion
Political and billionaires run our country and so does politics. That is why it matter on how we elect people to be in office. This is manipulation as cartoons and other advertising of sexual changes in many things that were or are proper to being not good. It is all trying to breakdown family relationships. It is all psychological. Making 1 thinking it is okay, when it is not. Gay and lesbian are fine, but it is not okay to teach what the parents or guardians looking over what is being taught in school or tv viewing also handheld devices.
Because "the gay" is like a disease. Like if you are not gay or attracted to folks of the same sex. . . someone can convince you to be gay.
It is like reverse gay conversation therapy or something.
Well aren't you a little woke, social justice warrior.
What should we be teaching kids? I'm more worried about problem solving skills... analytical thinking skills, science, mathematics, English (or whatever the nation's language is), history... things that lead to jobs and contributing to society.
What needs to happen in school regarding the subject of LGBT... etc. ?
Exactly! Children go to school to learn the basics - how to read, write, calculate without needing to use a calculator, and other useful, practical skills. Why do they need to know about the latest trend in woke pronoun usage?
Straight is the way people were meant to be. If everyone was gay the Human species would be extinct.
There IS a gay agenda and it is being forced onto children in schools by liberal women teachers. They promote it to kids as young as 3 years old to confuse them.
Any kind of sexual education shouldn't be taught to children before 12 when the majority hit puberty. It is abuse.
Many homosexual people are child abusers. They are so intent on including sexual topics and content in school with elementary aged kids and including it in the cartoons that those young kids watch. they are obsessed with sexualizing little kids. It is disgusting.
Because there's no need to add gay or bi things on TV jus for the sake of showing it to children more, the most natural and common sexuality is straight... It's like they purposely add in gay or bi things to tv purposely jus to please the lgtbt community.. there's no need... I don't think any little boy at home watching TV is happy to see two men kissing.. I think they find it disgusting and rather not see that.. they rather see boy and girl kiss.. the natural way... Showing boy and boy kiss could corrupt their young mind and turn them down the path of being gay
Well I think teenagers should be the taught about things like this because they can make their own minds about it and see where it leads. For little ones, I think shows that are just funny and teach basic human lessons about how to treat others and being a good person instead of a bad person is best. I have no problem with LGBTQ pushing their agenda into shows but the little ones are just kids. let them be kids, let them enjoy their short period of ignorance. Let them grow up and figure things out on their own. Teenagers age's 15 and up should be the only group that should be watching anything related to politics.
It's been said that all teenagers go through a phase of confusion and they reach out to whatever options they've been shown. If their options are, 'park ranger' or 'firefighter' that's what they will say, "i was born to do this'. If the option is homosexual sex addict with loud mouthed political slogans... they go that route. Of course LGBTQ will claim it's not a choice while simultaneously being unable to explain the sudden rise in number of homosexuals.
I don't give a shit if they want to make a gay superhero. What I do have a problem with is when they take preexisting superheroes who were originally straight and make them gay. Same with race and gender swapping.
It's incredibly lazy writing and it implies that no gay character could ever be successful unless they take the form of an already popular superhero. If I was gay and actually cared about if a superhero is gay or not, I'd take a lot of issue with that.
Also people joke about Netflix having the obligatory gay character because it started as trope subversion but has been done ad nauseum to the point where NOT having a gay character is a trope subversion. I think there is a right way to do gay characters but overuse can be annoying especially if being gay takes up their entire personality, which is a stereotype.
Because of your age I’m going to save my breathe of how stupid this comment is. Let kids be kids…no one wants to see a gay ass Batman and shit…neither do kids need to see that shit who don’t even know anything about that shit…it’s stupid…gays have enough shit…I’m not homophobic I’m just real
Yeah. Remember back in the days when the world was sane in the early 2000s no kid was forced to see this unnatraural shit... We're progressing backwards
Yeah true, shit is sickening. If everyone was “gay” then there would be no more humanity, it is unnatural seriously. Just because some people are “different” doesn’t mean that everyone else has to be “different” too and everyone else shouldn’t be forced to see shit on tv that is forced upon us because of certain peoples “feelings”, especially our kids.
How does gay representation make everyone gay. Your logic is questionable, so you really think the human species that always grows rapidly. We are currently at 7.9 billion humans, and there’s no sign of stopping not only that but there are lgbtq people that can get pregnant and reproduce.. not every lgbtq individuals gay. And there’s no evidence that the lgbtq population decreases the human population, that’s just non sense.
Lgbtq people have existed for a long time, there have even been bisexual Pharos in ancient Egypt. Scientists also observe homosexual behaviors in different animal species so the claim that its unnatural is not only a logical fallacy as you’d have to first define what you believe qualifies as something being natural. But it’s also just untrue when looking at nature
www.imperial.ac.uk/.../
Homosexual behaviors and activities are actually very common in the animal kingdom so there’s absolutely no reason for us as humans to think that homosexuality is unnatural within our own species
My point was that homo sexuality is not the “norm” a man with a woman is the norm otherwise without that connection one could not reproduce, there for it is not the natural way. Some animals kill their own young, and eat their own kind so it’s not the best comparison to compare us to animals just saying, because a animal does something doesn’t mean it should be the “norm” for humans. The point is “homo sexuality” is a real thing, and y’all have your rights, etc, etc…. however normal people such as myself, I for one am disgusted at the sight of two men kissing. What people want to do is their own choice that’s fine. However it’s not how God intended us to be, nor is it something that should be in kids cartoons. It’s disgusting and not “normal” human nature. Whatever illusion you want to tell yourself is fine, but the truth of the matter is normal heterosexual people which is what majority of humans are don’t really want to see that shit, and don’t want that to be forced upon us in society. For example us men we are now supposed to refer to ourself as cis gender male, that term to me sounds like someone is trying to take away the masculinity of being a man. by the way there are only two real genders male and female if you think otherwise argue with science not based on feelings, In extremely rare times there can be a such thing as a hermaphrodite however that’s a totally different thing itself.
They’re just assholes. If they don’t want lgbtqia+ agenda to be forced on them, then they shouldn’t be forcing heterosexuality in every damn thing. They’re not even ashamed of showing heterosexual love on tv to five year old children. If it’s not too early for them to witness heteronormativity then it ain’t too early to witness lgbtqia+…
Exactly
Uh i dont think kids should even see people kiss, straight or not. Even straight kissing isnt1t fine to show to children below 11 years of age.
If i do have kids in the future, i would sit with them and explain all this when they are around 12. If you show this to children who are like 7 or 8, obviously they are going to get confused
Well for starters, Batman's original love interest was Vicki Vale. As DJB72 put it, stay faithful to the original character.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicki_Vale
i do not really have a problem with lgbtq characters being in a show and what not but what i do have a problem with is them taking an alreay made character who has years worth of backstory then just making then gay or black or what not just for sake of it
why not just make an original character who is lgbtq or what ever you want really
What do you mean by 'fake complain'?
I do not know, how they show it to children.
Been told, that they drop children of the cliff in that direction (figure of speech), instead of explaining all of it and saying, that it is OK to be one of alphabet people...
I hate all, that 'Woke', SJW agendas, they represent small minority of people, there are more important stuff happening in the world, then try to attend to someone minority of peoples feelings, as tomorrow they will fell bad about something else and there we are jumping around with constantly moving target.
I do not care about alphabet people, they can live their life as they want, as long as it is lawful and morally right. I do not want to hear about them on every corner and I do not need every movie adjusted to their feelings...
I'm bi leaning towards girls and I say sexuality shit needs to stay the fuck out of kids shows and movies, it has no place being there
Thank you!
How is kissing sexual
@doopayo Chemistry and hormones. Surprised you don't know basic biology.
@Aiko it has nothing to do with biology. There are cultures where it’s fine to kiss your child on the lips and it’s not sexual at all
So hormones have nothing to do with biology therefore it is a magical thing with no explanation? That's not how the world works. If you want to talk about those cultures then i can also say there are also cultures that it's ok to actually mary minors just like how the world was back then when our lifespan was pretty low. We live in a society now and we evolve to have decency overtime and how studies on why people get uncomfortable when being kissed on the lips.
Never was talking about hormones. Kissing in and of itself isn’t a sexual act, it can be a sexual act of course but the act of kissing in and of itself isn’t sexual.
For example, when you kiss your mom on the cheek? That’s not sexual, it’s familial affection
It’s about the type of kiss and the context
You're not talking about it but it doesn't remove the fact that hormones have something to do with kissing. If you want to talk about kissing your parents, it's just like how normal it is to breastfeed with your mom if i have also talked about before how breastfeeding turns the mother on because hormones. That may happen but that's all very small issue that it almost doesn't matter unless you do it with a stranger. So even if it's slightly sexual if you do it with your parents, the word sexual still there. You wonder why no boobs are shown in kids show right? Oh it's just society blame it in society as if you're better than society yourself
Also because you were the one who also said boobs are not sexual
Cause they aren’t.. society sexualizes boobs. They aren’t sexual
I’ve already explained this
You actually stop replying in the last explanation i gave to you about boobs. I give you number of reasons why girls hide it and they feel uncomfortable of it being shown. I also give you the fact that nipple orgasms exist and mothers get turned on if they breastfeed their child. You think you're the only one who already explained?
I don't know but I have questions.
Wasn't homosexuality rampant in ancient Rome or Greece? Wasn't incest and child sex also standard in many past civilizations?
So does that mean sexuality is purely cultural?
I think they are against the "gay agenda" because they don't want culture to make their kids gay.
So the first question is, is that even possible? Second question is, does it matter? Why should you care if society turns your kid gay or Trans or w/e?
Culture cannot turn a person gay. Other things can. A boy being molested by a male teacher or other authority figure, and not being believed by your parents, or getting any kind of supportive therapy, for instance. I personally know of cases of this.
It's not FAKE i openly do not support that filth or any sexuality in my children's faces. You're a child therefore you can not tell grown adults with fully devolped minds on how to accept something for their OWN Children and then decide it's fake outrage.
No ones saying that lol, they have a problem with forced representation, superman is a prime example. cannonly straight "but he's gay now diversity yay" lame
forced representation is only ever said when the characters are something said person saying dislikes
Bad representation is the only thing that exists, forced representation is just a dog whistle for bigoted thinking.
im afraid you have no clue how story writing works then. shit being forced has been a problem in media for ages, but before i tell you more im going to have a drink of my coke zero, maximum taste 0 suger only for 1 quid per can! so as i was saying forced content has been a problem especially with sponsorships. it breaks the pace and doesn't fit well. i was able to write this due to coke zero, pride edition. show ur pride with style and be healthy doing it!
u get the idea?
I get your point but that’s not called forced representation. It’s called disingenuous/misguided representation where companies will put up something inclusive to get money whilst not actually supporting or doing anything for said communities or even going as far to disenfranchise people in said communities within their own company.
Portraying the representation itself as being forced is usually used to attack said community instead of putting blame on the hypocritical company for being disingenuous
I think it's a bit too much to confuse children with such stuff.
Homosexuality is not a common thing or a natural adaptation. If one prefers to be homosexual, it should be out of their own choice and not out of the influence of media.
I suspect that showing such homosexual acts will really confuse a kids mind and complicate their social relationship
Homosexuality occurs in animals just like heterosexuality occurs in animals. It’s a “normal” thing in nature
And trust me thats a dumb concept. When I was little I came across this film about a trans girl experiencing gender dysphoria and I never became trans? I also wasn’t confused, I did understand the film and I actually cried when watching it cause of how emotional it was.
And a sexuality isn’t an adaptation, tf are you talking about. And it’s not like it needs to be a common occurrence to give lgbtq people representation in kids media
How old were you then?
Plus I don't really care about people being homosexual or trans and I think lesbians are hot, but it's not how nature programmed the species, homosexuality is a deviation or defect. Still I don't dislike what people chose to do as long as it's consensual, but I don't think it's something that should be fed to the public on a daily basis
Plus that show was about trans, not about a guy or girl being homosexual.
No they are pushing something that isn’t natural onto kids before they know what they really like themselves until puberty when they will know for sure. It’s really not good. I don’t think that is healthy to see that for the small percentage of homosexuals there really is for them to push that in movies now
Of course and that’s just in general. I disagree greatly that kids are so incompetent enough that watching gay people kiss is going to hurt their little brains, kids are much smarter than adults give them credit for. The only thing that’s holding kids back is the fact that so many adults have your mindset.
I’d also like for you to define what you view as being “natural” because homosexuality has been around since ancient times. There were even bisexual Pharos in ancient Egypt
en.m.wikipedia.org/.../Homosexuality_in_ancient_Egypt
We also see homosexuality in other animal species so it’s nonsensical to say it’s not going to be natural on our species.
I also don’t quite understand how showing a gay kiss in a comic book is “pushing something in movies” we see movie characters smoke and drink, fight to the death but somehow homosexuals kissing is the end of the world and absolutely unhealthy to show to our kids despite the fact that half of them have grown up seeing their parents kissing, looking at Disney characters kiss?
It’s unnatural because it doesn’t produce offspring as in procreate, it’s also the minority not the majority so why even show it, when is done by most it’s considered normal as in heterosexual, just because some people prefer the same sex and even animals doesn’t mean it’s natural but you’ll always have a few in all species where this happens. So much is censored in movies and tv which considered like certain violent scenes and yet they are trying to push something else that isn’t the norm and confusing most kids
That logic is questionable. There are straight couples that are infertile and unable to have kids, not only that but you’re missing the fact that kids aren’t commodities. There’s much more that comes into play with having children than just being able to get pregnant.
You have to be able to provide: food, shelter, water and desirably an environment with minimal risks of anything horrible happening to your children.
Everyone deserves to be represented, not just the majority. If we always had that backwards way of thinking humanity would quite literally never progress. Nazis used your reasoning to persecute German Jews so you might not want to go down that realm of reasoning?
Than if it being shown in humans for centuries and being shown in animals isn’t enough to prove to you homosexuality is natural than you’re going to have to explain to me what you define as “natural” cause we might be using two different definitions of the word?
What violent scenes are being censored in movies, I’d also like to know how violent scenes being censored for children is better than children being shown lgbtq people exist?
Again, children aren’t stupid. They’re extremely intelligent but just aren’t given the credit despite their brains being ripe and able to suck up information like a sponge. In fact kids are innately biological more accepting to other people than adults (and yeah, that includes lgbtq people)
cocosci.princeton.edu/.../...ChildrenAreBetter.pdf
That’s why kids are way more nice than adults, they’re Innocent. They don’t have the years of possibly harmful assumptions about certain groups of people that adults may hold.
So no, kids aren’t “confused” about lgbtq people. You’re the one that’s confused and that’s absolutely ok. Everyone can learn no matter the age, it just takes time to unlearn the years on conscious and unconscious bias to educate yourself further on issues from groups of people you might have otherwise ignored and pushed aside
What I meant is its not logical because if everyone was like that, there wouldn’t be any people if it was normal, of course there is going to be some abnormalities in the course of nature , it’s still confusing to young children , I wouldn’t have understood it back then, we always knew every kid had a mother and father
Well that’s not how logic works? In fact that conclusions inherently illogical, not every humans going to be the same and that’s the beauty of human nature. We are going to have different cultures, different ethnic groups, different skin colors, different eye colors, different sexuality’s, different backgrounds, different languages, etc. Diversity is inherent in literally any species that’s as big and has as many people as the human species.
Again, you’re assuming homosexuality is abnormal which is another logical fallacy which assumes that homosexuality is undesirable or wrong which are objective terms that can’t logically be placed on something that can’t be evaluated in such a way.
Again, it isn’t confusing to young children at all as young children are more open to differences as compared to adults which have unconscious biases.
To say that you wouldn’t have understood it back then is an assumption which might not even be true as children don’t hold bias like adults do when judging individuals.
Well I didn’t judge different religions when younger because I didn’t think anything of them because I really didn’t understand the differences, just seemed like they celebrated different holidays, now I know I wouldn’t have been accepted by them later in life because of the differences, so I really didn’t understand homosexuality the way I do now, I just accept it because some people are different but I just don’t need it pushed on me the differences. I don’t think it’s normal but it exists, everyone is going to have an opinion on that it I have mine. I’m very surprised how how much you know for your age and surprised how mature you seem to be, usually can’t have a mature conversation with your age group so I do get impressed once in awhile by your responses but like I said we all have our own opinions on this.
Because there's no need to shove it down people's throat, we already know homosexuals exist and I'm totally cool with that, nothing against it, I just don't see why they need bring sexuality into something like this.
I agree with ShatteredMasterpiece.