
Do you think Comedy and animation are low forms of entertainment?

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
Whhaaaat? As an animator the answer is absolutely not. Do you know how much time and energy it takes to animate? Each
For one second of what you see, that's at least 24 drawings. Do you know how many drawings that takes? Even to make a 30 second clip would be 30 × 24 = 720 drawings. This is before we talk about adding audio. As technology evolves it becomes less complicated but more complicated in some ways. Not to mention people like me who do stop motion animation, that's a whole fuckton of even more work before shooting can begin and then the piecing it together. Animation is an artform to be revered. The fact that people are so accustomed to it now, the work is not appreciated as it should be. Every animated movie takes years. And for stop motion even more years, to produce. Damn.
The "animation" is simply a vehicle for the communications of an idea.
This is the "communications cycle".
IDEA TO SEND > METHOD/MEANS > ENCODE > TRANSMIT > DECODE > METHOD/MEANS > RECEIVED IDEA.
One of my favorite examples was (and still is) "Rocky and Bullwinkle". The cartoon was really a political satire of the Cold War at a fairly high caliber. Together with Mr. Peabody, Dudley DoRight and a few other sets of shorts, the elements of the cartoons incorporated the same dry humor, reliance on puns, and disdain for the "fourth wall" separating the characters from the audience. Unlike most cartoons, Rocky and Bullwinkle, could keep the attention of both children and adults alike. The animation speed was in the neighborhood of 4-5 (effective) frames per second (ditto Hanna-Barbera output), as opposed to the industry standard of 24-30 fps. Even though there are "lags" and "catch-ups" in the effective animation speed, the idea/ concept/script and voice characterizations are tops, not "low" entertainment at all.
No. I often prefer them. Animation is a lengthy process and the art style can more flexibly convey themes than live action. Take for example (this sounds like an essay) the styling of the stop motion puppets and environment in A Nightmare Before Christmas.
Much as live action films can be styled to reflect a certain theme (e. g. Sweeney Todd) they are constrained by the physics of using human actors.
Nah. Art is what you make of it.
I might not always agree with everyone, but if they found a media they enjoy or something that genuinely brings them laughs, why not let them enjoy it if it isn't harmful to others?
Opinion
23Opinion
Far from it.
Animation was designed to provide visuals that cannot be shown through live action. Comedy can only be an issue if the structure of the jokes and the timing is off.
I don't remember the context of the quote in the show but I remember the girl saying this isn't very likeable so I don't think you are meant to take that quote seriously.
Comedy is not a low form of entertainment for me. However yes, animation certainly is. I don't find it entertaining at ALL.
Sorry to all those who work hard on it, I just can't seem to ever connect with it.
No not at all. Disney and nickelodeon can be quite entertaining
Animation is great
My kids convinced me to watch sonic 2 twice this month in theater we also watched bad guy. Prior to that we saw sing
I am not a snob...
and it is always a bit funny to see a snob here at G@G... I mean, having an account here at G@G, it will hardly ever get lower than that, lmao...
I'm not a snob either
No, but it often works out that way due to social expectations. This is why so many kids got traumatized when their parents saw Watership Down in a video store, and assumed an animated movie about rabbits must be for kids.
Animation from america apart from a few ones are of very low quality, animation from other countries (mostly eastern ones like japan for example) is of very good quality, its just that most people think of it as low quality while it really is not.
It depends on the show and company. I used to love disney in the early 2000s, but then lost interest as new stuff came. Same with cartoon network. And with adult animation it depends just as much.
Hell, no! Comedy is one of the best forms of entertainment. I'm watching a good one right now. Minder. You should watch it some time.
Simples...
I used to think so until they came out with Toy Story…I thought it was brilliant and hysterical.
I don’t care what anyone says, I appreciate all forms of animation :)
Animation is a format, you can tell any kind of story with it and it even allows you to do more than anything with actors, therefore, the potential is limitless!
No, it's closer to the highest form, second only to video games.
I don't think that at all. The stories told through those mediums can be phemonenally rich.
Definitely not.
(Unless it's Family Guy. Then yeah; that's a very low form of "entertainment.")
No. Some very old people think animation is just for kids but even the old Warner Brothers cartoons had subtle things for adults.
No way. Comedy and animation are fantastic. Also, Chuck Jones was a genius.
they are some of my favorite forms of entertainment
Sadly, those are all from a bygone era of quality. Scenes like freaking Tom playing a piano accurately TO THE KEY isn't happening now.
Nope they require a stronger will to grasp and endure before success
not at all, They have there purpose and fulfill a need.
No. It's all good entertainment to me.
Only if it's bad comedy or animation.
Yes, I think it is low forms of entertainment
they sure can be. but they aren't by default.
Depends on the source.
No marvel movies are the lowest.
Then how come Spongebob is so popular?
not at all
No i dont
No, I like them!
No I don’t.
You can also add your opinion below!