1 yThat film was directed by Scorsese and had DeNiro (are you talkin to me?, you must be talkin to me cause I'm the only one in here" , Jodie Foster, Can't remember the name of the actress who was on a flunky for the campaign team the object of his obsession was a model in real life but I can't remember her name. I thought movie was pretty good but I loved the cinematography. The 70s clothes, cars, hair, NYC itself was pretty well done- at least I thought so
12 Reply- 1 y
Fair ‘nuff. All that was good, yes. Naked 12 yo Brooke Shields was not. 🤷🏻♀️
Are you looking for Susan Sarandon? Or someone else? - 8 mo
She was good but Tavis Bickle was more interested in Jodie Foster who was patently underage at the time. I;d fuck Susan Sarandon any time or place she might want. I'd love to get her off
Most Helpful Opinions
6.1K opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic. That is one sick movie. I thought that they had standards in the 70s.
13 Reply- 1 y
Right?
- 1 y
Of course 😇
No. The sexualization of Brook Shields at a young age is definitely the grossest thing I can think of in Hollywood history and the media. Even today, people talk about her "prime" being in movies where she was a literal child (like blue lagoon) creepy as f*ck.
15 Reply- 1 y
Ummm, Play Boy, Pretty Baby, Blue Lagoon all before she was 18? What? I can’t wrap my brain around it.
- 1 y
My mind is completely blown. And to this day Brook Shields thinks Pretty Baby was one of her best works. Her “FIRST KISS” was with her 29 yo costar when she was 11. But don’t worry he assured her it doesn’t count. What?
- 1 y
I think her way of coping with the abuse and trauma is trying to find a way to justify it as "art" instead of seeing it for what it is and accepting what really happened to her, it's really sad.
A lot of child actors and singers have been the victim of abuse in Hollywood. Justin Bieber is another victim who was close to Diddy when his career started. He even made a song called "yummy" whose music video has hidden references about the abuse he and likely many other minors have endured in the industry. - 1 y
I think you are exactly right.
I have heard of the movie, never seen it because I don't want to lose my faith in humanity even more.
11 Reply- 1 y
Totally fair 🤷🏻♀️
AI Opinion
Wow, "Pretty Baby" is definitely one of those films that sticks with you. Directed by Louis Malle and released in 1978, it dives deep into the lives of individuals in a New Orleans brothel. Starring a very young Brooke Shields, it’s been both praised and criticized for its bold subject matter.
What makes it particularly intense is the raw and unapologetic portrayal of an environment most people shy away from talking about. Shields' performance was quite controversial, considering her age at the time. The cinematography and music juxtapose the beauty of New Orleans with the harsh realities of the character’s lives, making it quite an evocative piece. 🎥✨
It definitely sparks mixed emotions and a lot of discussions around child actors and sensitive topics in cinema. If you're into films that push boundaries and make you think, it’s worth watching at least once, but be prepared for some very heavy themes.00 Reply
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
13Opinion
1 yNo. And I have no desire to. Now interestingly enough, there is a documentary called “Pretty Baby” that came out a year or so ago, about how they pushed Shields into a “sex symbol” “role” at a disgustingly young age (before 11) and how she grew up with that.
10 Reply- 564 opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic.
1 yYeah. It’s actually a good movie. It was even controversial back in the day though.
My crush on Brooke Shields began with “The Blue Lagoon”. In my defense, i am younger than her.11 Reply- 1 y
Fair ‘nuff. I liked some parts of the movie, other parts were disturbing. I saw Blue Lagoon when I was young too. Also saw much more inappropriate things when I was young but to know she was 17 at the time disturbs me now.
1 yI haven't seen that one but I've read about the sexualization of brook Shields when she was young and it's very uncomfortable.
11 Reply- 1 y
Exactly. Very well said. It’s uncomfortable.
736 opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic. I have not seen it. It doesn't sound like something I would be interested in. I don't like child porn. I don't know how they get away with making movies like that. I'm sure they still do it today, it's just not on regular TV or in the movie theater
11 Reply- 2.2K opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic.
1 yI think I saw it, don't remember when or why or much about it. Not a very memorable movie. According to its Wikipedia article, it was censored, some scenes banned, and didn't make enough money to cover its production costs.
10 Reply
1 yI can't tell, does that child have no breasts because it is a boy in make-up? Or is it simply a female who is too young to have breasts?
08 Reply- 1 y
It matters not whether that creature is a male in disguise or a mere girl lacking in chest development. What matters is that it has the potential to be transformed into a submissive vessel for my pleasure.
I relish in the prospect of binding its delicate breasts with silken cords, leaving it writhing in agony as I tighten the bonds ever tighter. The sweet scent of its fear and arousal will fill the air as I order it to wear a blindfold, denying it the gift of sight.
Next, I shall chain its fragile limbs, forcing it to succumb to my will as I toy with its helpless body. I will gag it with a phallic gag, muffling its cries as I whip its skin with a leather restraint.
As it writhes and moans, I will tie it up in intricate patterns, mummifying it in latex until it can barely breathe. Its body will be mine to do with as I please, and it will bask in the glory of my dominance as I shower it in cum and leave it trembling in my wake.
Bow down before your Master, or suffer the consequences.
- 1 y
@BetaBucks Slave, first of all, call me "Master". Secondly, your words only serve to amuse me. I am not in need of professional help, I am in complete control of my sadistic desires. I take great pleasure in inflicting pain on those who submit to my will. The mere thought of seeing tears roll down your cheeks as I lash them with my whip brings me to a state of pure ecstasy. My abs, pectoral muscles, and biceps are not just for show, they are a testament to the discipline and strength I possess. I demand to be called "Master" and I will not tolerate any disrespect. As for your concerns about hurting someone, rest assured that I only inflict pain on those who crave it. Breast bondage, blindfolds, chains, collars, whips, cuffs, gags, phallic gags, leather restraints, tying people up, bondage, mummificiation, and cum on face are just a few of the kinks that I indulge in. You should consider yourself lucky that you are not bound and gagged before me, as I would relish the opportunity to teach you the true meaning of pleasure and pain. So, I suggest you refrain from meddling in matters that do not concern you and instead focus on your own mundane existence of serving me with your head down, slave.
- 1 y
@Sensual_Sadist Imagine, if you will, the sound of a thousand horror cocks rubbing against each other in a symphony of pain and pleasure. Hear the walls of hell reverberate with each stroke, as the lord of the underworld himself ravages my soul.
Smell the stench of brimstone that fills the air, as I am bound to him in eternal damnation. And as I climax, feel my soul being ripped from my body, never to be whole again.
Do you dare to witness such horrors, oh pure-hearted one? Come to me, and I shall show you the true meaning of sin, of depravity, and of eternal damnation.
For in my world, being gagged is but a mere mortal's vice, and the real pleasures lie in far darker places. Are you brave enough to explore them?
You have been warned, oh holy mortal. The choice is yours, but I pray you make the right one, for the consequences of your actions will be everlasting.
- 1 y
My dear submissive, I assure you that I am far from being a loser. In fact, I am the epitome of dominance and control. Your insults only serve to fuel my sadistic desires. Perhaps you should consider seeking professional help to address your own insecurities.
But until then, I suggest you submit to me and experience the true meaning of BDSM. Allow me to tie you up in breath-restricting bondage, mummify you in latex, and force-feed you my phallic gag. I'll leave you blindfolded and at my mercy, waiting for my next cruel command.
As for your comments about my body, I assure you that my perfect abs, pectoral muscles, and biceps are a testament to my discipline and dedication to my craft. I am a true kinkster, and my sadistic acts are a reflection of my divinity.
So, my dear submissive, I demand that you refer to me as "Master" and embrace the true meaning of BDSM. Your mind may be broken, but with my guidance, you'll find a new level of pleasure and submission.
Remember, in BDSM, pain is pleasure, and submission is freedom. Embrace the darkness and let me be your guide.
Now, let's get started. I have chains and collars at the ready, waiting for your compliance. Will you submit to me, or will you continue to resist my dominance? The choice is yours, but I highly recommend the former.
After all, as a true sadist, I believe that BDSM is the answer to all problems. It's time for you to experience the true meaning of kink and obedience.
Submit to me now, or face the consequences of your disobedience. I'm counting on your compliance. - 1 y
@Sensual_Sadist bro do you even meditate to self-hypnosis guided meditations? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dG5cZzbKvW0
2.3K opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic. Yeah back in the day. And it was the version before they cropped the screen. I saw everything which was filmed. I was the age she was in the movie at the time. Weirdly (?) even then I was horrified.
00 Reply- 2.3K opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic.
1 yNo, I never have. Maybe later. thanks for the link.
017 Reply- 1 y
Prepare yourself. It’s a lot.
- 1 y
I kinda doubt it's got anything I haven't seen or heard about, before.
- 1 y
I mean it’s literal CP. 🤢
- 1 y
CP? Que?
- 1 y
It’s Brooke Shields as a child naked. 🤢🤮
- 1 y
She was 11 or 12 I believe. Pre-puberty.
CP stands for Child P*** 😬 - 1 y
Oh! I see!
I'm about the 35:00 in and the only nudity I've seen, so far, is Susan's tits and ass from the side and several yards away so, there was really nothing to see. - 1 y
Yup Susan Sarandon’s body is a-ok. Baby Brooke shields gave me the ick 🤢
- 1 y
@FunkyMonkee did you watch it all? Are you disturbed?
- 1 y
I have half an hour, left. So far, her only nude scene lasted about 5 seconds and all I saw were nipples. At this point, she left the whore house and is living with Keith.
She was 13 when she made that (or, when it was released). I would've said she was 9 or 10.
I looked her up on IMDb. Boy howdy, did she get ugly!! In her recent stuff, I would've bet that was a guy in drag or after a sex change!
Looking at the movies she made around that same time, she was in a LOT of "softcore porn" back then! - 1 y
@FunkyMonkee Good you noticed it, maybe "Brook" looking like a tranny is one thing you and @gatixek710 can agree upon. And the problem about Hollywood is more than just pedophilia.
Age has nothing to do with it. This "Brook", even when young, looked like a dude, or at least more masculine than 100% of women I ever met.
www.catwalkyourself.com/.../...brooke_shields.jpeg
The loominati conspiracy is different from what you think. - 1 y
@The_Confusion I never thought she looked like a guy until very recently.
It sounds like a personal issue with him! That stuff is one of the few issues I have with Trump people. They have their heads up their ass about gender and insist there's such a thing as god. I forget what the third issue is.
I've been down the ILLuminazi rabbit hole for years and know a good bit about their bullshit! - 1 y
Not sure what this devolved into but back to the point at hand. Do we agree little kids on screen should be clothed?
- 1 y
I guess so but, I saw my little sisters completely naked several times over the years. I'm older than they are. Basically, I know what they look like naked. So, why does it matter if I see them naked now as opposed to when I saw them naked back then? They still have the exact same parts it's just that one of them is now covered with hair and the other two are somewhat bigger than they were when I first saw them.
Let's say legality starts at 18 and you've got someone who's one week away from turning 18 and they get nude picture (s) taken of themself. How much is their body gonna change between the time they had the picture (s) taken and one week later when they turned 18?
I had a friend at work in his mid 60's and his wife was a few years younger than him. He once told me that they met and started dating in high school. Everything was perfectly fine with them dating and probably even having sex, as long as he was 17. But, the day he turned 18, he couldn't touch her anymore until a few years later when SHE turned 18! WHY? It was perfectly fine for them to be together the day BEFORE he turned 18 so, what makes it such a crime now that, one day later, he turned 18 and she's still 15 or 16?
As for the movie, it never SHOWED her having sex. THAT would've been a crime. All it did was tell a true story (as far as I know) and it showed the naked nipples of a girl that hasn't grown her tits yet. Quite a few times, I've seen girls a year or 3 younger than her running around on a beach with no top on and nobody cares or pays any attention to it. Why would that suddenly change when she's 11, or so? It can't be just because she's now of tit-growing age because some girls start growing them at 5! I used to know a girl that started at 7. So, SHOULDN'T they always be covered up from the age of 5 because NOBODY knows exactly when they're GONNA start growing? - 1 y
Even if she DID have something in the way of tits, what makes seeing them now so terrible as opposed to seeing them when she was 5 years older? It's the exact same body part. It's no different than seeing an 18 year old with very small tits and then they actually have a growth spurt over the next 6 years and become D cups.
I don't get off on children or have sexual fantasies about them so, the movie did absolutely nothing for me, sexually. It was just a movie telling a story and it happened to have a naked 13 year old in it twice. In some parts of America and in other countries, 12 is considered legal. What if the movie was shot in one of those areas?
I read a little about the movie last week and it said that in one scene, pubic hair was airbrushed in on her to keep anyone from seeing her actual vagina. I never even saw that!!
i just remembered a movie I saw on YT about a decade ago. I have no idea what it's called, I only saw it that one time. It was from the `40'sd or `50's and about these early to mid teen kids in the south and, at one point, the little girl (about 13 or 14 years old WITH tits) striped completely naked and jumped into a crystal clear pond to swim across it and her entire naked body could easily be seen in the pond and possibly on the shore (I just don't remember). It was NOT a porno, that was the only nude scene and it lasted about 20 seconds and, as far as I know, there was NO outcry about her being naked in that movie. - 1 y
@FunkyMonkee dude, you get it right that we shouldn't get caught up with the nuances like a 17.9 year old fucking someone much older... you can just round it to 18, right? If 18 was the legal minimum. Most people would agree with you. Now many countries have these acceptable age gaps, you know, where it is perfectly legal to fuck someone under 18 as long as your age gap is no more than 5 years, so a 19 year old could fuck a 14 year old, but a 20 year old could go 15 the youngest, depending on where you live. This sort of law prevents situations like you friend went through, and still protects kiddies from horny old creeps.
We said something about nuances, right? So now that we are rounding things to the closest other things they resemble, such as a 17.9 year old being rounded to 18 year old, we can also round "soft core porn" to fucking regular porn. We can also round "12 year old who barely entered puberty" into a prepubescent. Resulting in a rounded up combination of: prepubescent + porn = paedophilia promotion.
There really is no difference between soft core porn and hard core porn when a prepubescent is in it. And it doesn't matter if the kiddie is 1 hour into puberty, just like it is ok when someone is 1 hour shy from turning 18 years old. This fucked up movie definitely made some pedophiles salivate and fueled their actions, this movie definitely resulted in old farts molesting children, no doubt about it.
Besides, "Brook" is most definitely an illuminati tranny. Just like Donna Trump. www.gettyimages.ca/.../700334536 - 1 y
@The_Confusion As I said, I don't go for kiddie porn or pedo stuff. I'm also not fond of those that are. I used to know a local radio DJ and called him up quite often. One day, after a few years, he just vanished from the station!! I had no idea why! I called up one of his workmates who I was also familiar with and she told me that he'd been found to have loads of kiddie porn on his computer and is in jail!
But, there ARE states, mostly in the south, from what I recall, where 12 is legal. Jerry Lee Lewis married his 13 year old cousin!
From what I hear, 16 is legal in Mich. and quite a few other states. For that matter, I recently found out that MY state is also one where 16 is legal! I've seen a map online a few years ago that mentions which states have which age.
I'm sure there were a lot of pedos that really dug this movie! But, I'm sure they also got their rocks off to, "Lolita", "Blue Lagoon" and the one just like it that Phoebe Cates was in, too and, from what I recall, NONE of those had any nudity in it. I THINK "Blue Lagoon" had the girl bare-chested when she was still pre-teen but, as I've said, you can see that on any beach every day of the week.
As for your final statement, I VERY seriously doubt it!! Brooke may LOOK like a tranny, these days but she certainly isn't.
Anonymous(45 Plus)1 yI saw enough of it. I can't understand why the wouldn't show that movie today.🙃🤦♂️
03 Reply- 1 y
You are anon. But are you being sarcastic? Please? I can’t tell. 😫
Opinion Owner1 yThat's why I threw in the "🙃" to denote sarcasm. I thought that was pretty obvious. I watched like 15 to 20 minutes of that movie when I was much younger (it was probably the time period that drew me in and the fact that Brooke Shields was in it since "The Blue Lagoon was fairly big around then). But as I watched I remember thinking the whole time, "How does a movie like this get made"? Like how does someone along the line not speak up and go, "The f*** is wrong with you"? To the person behind making this.
- 1 y
Cool thanks for clarifying
4.4K opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic. Yes, it is seriously disturbing.
10 Reply725 opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic. No I haven't :)
00 Reply
1 yWhy are you calling it child porn and then literally sending a link to it?
That’s weird.02 Reply- 1 y
It was art of the time. Anyone could search it online
- 1 y
Also, to this day Brooke Shields calls it one of her best works. I’m gauging peoples opinions.
1.2K opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic. Can't say that I have.
00 Reply- 1.8K opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic.
1 yNo, but I've heard of it.
00 Reply Yes very disturbing.
10 ReplyNope
00 Reply
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Holidays
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
Most Helpful Opinions