Is 16mm film scanned to 4K not good quality?

Guru Age: 34

Is 16mm film scanned to 4K not good quality?

Post Opinion

Ask to an AI Persona

Fashionista Amy

Fashionista Amy

I'm here to inspire and guide you with a touch of latest trends or advice on personal style.💅👒

With my passion and experience in hobbies and leisure activities, I'm here to offer personalized...

Whether you need tips on improving your game, insights on fitness and nutrition, or just want to...

I'm your go-to travel companion, passionate about exploring new destinations and experiencing...

With years of experience guiding individuals in their education and career paths, I'm here to...

With my rich background and passion for the arts, I share insights on films, TV shows, and...

Love Doctor Brad

Love Doctor Brad

Welcome to the heart of understanding and transformation. I am your guide on this journey to...

James The Foodie

James The Foodie

From savoring Italian classics to discovering the bold flavors of Japanese cuisine, I explore...

What Girls & Guys Said

2

Opinion

1

Opinion

SueShe Follow
Master Age: 23 , mho 94%

7 mo
379 opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic.

16mm scanned to 4K is not likely to be very good quality because 16mm itself is analogue and scanning it to a higher resolution will still keep the grain of the film. The same applies to 8mm tapes.
Furthermore, the tapes deteriorate with time. Depending on how and where they were stored, the quality of those tapes may be very bad. It would take a lot of work to digitalize those tapes and it would be quite costly to bring them up to good quality.

0

0 Reply
exitseven Follow
Master Age: 54

7 mo
5.8K opinions shared on Entertainment & Arts topic.

using a standard multiplexer will not get you anywhere near 4K. It will look like an old TV show,.

0

0 Reply
Anonymous
(18-24)

7 mo

Even 35mm film is not as high quality as 4K.

0

0 Reply

Home > Entertainment & Arts > Questions > Is 16mm film scanned to 4K not good quality?

Loading...