Compared to, say, 2003 or 2004 - has WWE as 'televisio' become too polished, too slick and too visually - shiny?

It just seems like it looks so cool and so flashy and shiny - and it's fantastic in high definition in this glorious 2020s decade.

However - πŸ‘€πŸ‘€ unless it's just my nostalgia and my own eyeballs - has what the "product' lost visually is "any sense of this being amateur or gritty" - aka a lot of polish and not a lot of - grit.

Or even - spit. So to speak. I guess it's like watching something on a home video camera versus high definition camera in between only 20 years.
Yes too shiny
No not shiny enough
Other
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Updates
2 mo
Note - the safety improvements and wellbeing of performer improvements and fans enjoyment is all cool. Improved graphics, improved cameras, sure. Yet it's as if the soul 😇 of the old ways just seemed cool. Not the blading (blood) or the excess. But just the cool, unpredictable nature of the escapism 😆😁✌🏻
Updates
2 mo
Thanks, MHOs awarded :) please enjoy my other profile Questions ❓🤭 on any topics you like to answer
Compared to, say, 2003 or 2004 - has WWE as 'televisio' become too polished, too slick and too visually - shiny?
Post Opinion