Is a man a simp if he listens to a woman?

[Anonymous]

my new boss was telling me things about her life i was listening to her. i was also asking questions about her life as i was curious.

Updates

+1 y

i always hear the word simp being toss around online i never thought it meant anything.

but i was still curious.

[dynamicyandere]

Simping is when men volunteer unwarranted subservience to women, simply because of the woman’s outwardly beauty. They are men who grovel before attractive-looking women. They put them on a pedestal and worship them. It’s cheap submission, given to whoever they find physically attractive. It’s completely undignified and shows a man’s lack of self worth.


Listening to a woman is completely different.


Every man or woman who is respectable knows the importance of listening. Leaders, presidents, kings, and queens, all know how to listen. It’s courteous and wise to know how to listen more than you speak.


Listening has nothing to do with simping or being a simp.


Though, some people throw that word around incorrectly and just label any perceived “weak” behavior as simpy.


But simply listening to what a woman wants to say is not “weak” and any man that thinks otherwise is immature and lacks the understanding of what good leadership is.

[Guy13]

No a man is not a Simp for listening to a woman. It is good to let a woman speak and share her emotions. It gets old quickly but sometimes I have to be the girlfriend.
Now following some sort of relationship rule book she’s got is Simping for sure. I’m not talking about that.

[mandyfire98]

Not at all. I think more men need to listen to women and vice versa. There's nothing wrong with conversing with the opposite gender.

[blissinanarchy1]

You’re not a simp for listening., You’d be a simp if you were giving her an unequal exchange of value. Basically, you treat her like a queen and she don’t give a fuck about you.

[CuriousMufuxka]

Not at all. A man is a simp if he sees his girl getting fucked by another dude and either doesn't kill both of them or jerks off.

[loveslongnails]

" sees his girl getting fucked by another dude and either doesn't kill both of them or jerks off."
So it's your belief that you should KILL your girl, and his lover, if you catch them fucking, which makes you a "man", but if you jerk off to it, you're a simp? That's your statement?

[CuriousMufuxka]

My statement, if you would have read it correctly and used a little common sense clearly defines a simp as jerking off instead of doing anything like taking out both parties in cold blood. Neither make a man besides a little bitch or an angry asshole that's going to do time or end his own life after the double murder.

[loveslongnails]

Unfortunately, common sense doesn't really apply because there ARE men who do that. And your answer doesn't really make any sense upon second reading. Sounds like you're trying to say "he's a simp IF he sees his girl getting fucked by another dude and either jerks off or chooses NOT to kill them. So the clear implication is that you wouldn't be a "man" unless you inflicted some serious bodily harm.

[CuriousMufuxka]

@loveslongnails That is merely your interpretation as you cannot understand the difference between either and or.. It also shows your lack of comprehension in my reply "Neither make a man besides a little bitch or an angry asshole" Now I will speak this out to you in hopefully a way you will ultimately understand.. The simp would jerk off. A man would hopefully at least kill the bitch.

[loveslongnails]

" The simp would jerk off. A man would hopefully at least kill the bitch." That's exactly what I understood it to mean you condescending little twit. THEN you found the need to say "Neither make a man besides a little bitch or an angry asshole", which seems to totally contradicts what you JUST said, which was "the simp would jerk off". I don't understand the use of the word "besides". LOL Obviously, ONE of those choices, according to you, makes the male a simp (syn: little bitch).

[loveslongnails]

* typo - should be contradict, no "s".

[CuriousMufuxka]

@loveslongnails Such a shame you're so offended. Also there's no contradiction, you're just upset that my view doesn't match up with yours :)

[loveslongnails]

I'm not offended at all, merely pointing out that you are condescending. LOL I'm also pointing out your seeming contradiction due to your use of the word "besides" in your sentence. As a former English instructor, I know what an awkward sentence structure looks like. Not only that, I've never stated what my view is on the subject, but rather, only questioned YOUR statement. LOL Have a nice day.

[CuriousMufuxka]

@loveslongnails You didn't even answer the question, just decided to jump on my answer and got your typo ass handed to you! Don't play coy on the fact that I frustrated you enough to go insult.

[loveslongnails]

What does my not answering the question have to do with anything. That's your attempt at a strawman, as is patting yourself on the back for who knows what reason. LOL Have I insulted you by telling you the truth, that you responded like a condescending little twit? That's not an insult, it's a valid observation. As is your confused writing, which you still can't explain your way out of. Ok, 2nd time... have a nice day.

[CuriousMufuxka]

@loveslongnails It's that you picked my reply and through this "convo" backpedaled. There's clearly no confusion there other than you believing in your own bullshit. I say next time you try to question other's activities without throwing down yourself, try to know what you're talking about.

[loveslongnails]

You're just proving my point and deflecting with nonsense... "believing my own bullshit" what does that mean? LOL "Not knowing what I'm talking about". More nonsense. You can't accept that you made a widdle boo boo, and you're even more of a condescending twit now than before. 3rd time. Have a nice day.

[CuriousMufuxka]

@loveslongnails You have still to make an actual point! You have shown nothing beyond typos and butthurt.

[NostalgiaSenpi]

No, lol.