Most Helpful Girl
depends on the motive. not trashy but I think that one would have been better on the shoulder or higher on the back...2
depends on the motive. not trashy but I think that one would have been better on the shoulder or higher on the back...
Ehh, I'm really not a fan of tattoos in general. I'd prefer a girl with a blank canvas but it's not a deal breaker. I wouldn't date a girl with a lot of tattoos but if it was just one or two that had personal meaning/significance then i wouldn't care. Yours doesn't look trashy but it's really cliche. I guess it's better than having a "live fast die young tattoo" I'd reject you on the spot if you had one of those ;)
Like all other tattoos, it's more about what they are and if they're well done. If it looks like your cousine did it with a home made ink gun in your basement then yeah, it's trashy and unattractive.
Still somewhat trashy. Definitely not sexy or cute. That being said, I'm not a fan of tattoos in general.
small = cute
big, like across your whole back = trashy.
It's something to look at while in the position. I dont mind it.
It "can" be sexy, but most aren't. Her tattoo is just there
Don't really care for tattoos in general. So I wouldn't care. My ex had her name tattooed on her lower back, didn't care much.
Trashy as fuck.
I have a funny story about tattoos! they can be hazardous!
Doesn't look good at all, but I don't like any tattoos at all.
it's trashy if i ever see it before i see you naked for the first time
I like them! They can definitely be cute. :)
Always trashy. Sometimes sexy as well.
Sexy if it is small but not a huge one
I would say it depends on the motive. That butterfly for instance doesn't look trashy to me, but cheesy.
I dont think its trashy.
Super trashy unless its a full back tattoo
I consider them trashy, but that's just me.
You cannot undo this action. The opinion owner is going to be notified and earn 7 XPER points.