I don't have any tattoos myself so I may be a bit biased. But I do think some women take things a little too far with full body art? Do men like this or would a guy rather have clear, ink free skin to look at? I have always wondered, does it detract from them sexually by a male perspective?Come on, tats on boobs? That is sacrilege!her butt crack must smell like daisies?
Updates
+1 y
Here is the real question. Would you marry a girl with that much ink? Or is the attitude like choice of having kids. It's okay if they have kids but I don't want any. Nor would I marry a girl/guy with kids?
Updates
+1 y
Stars that have regretted tattoos and tried to get them removed include Ariana Grande, Justin Bieber, Khloe Kardashian ( Kim told her not to because you don't put a bumper sticker on a Bentley but she didn't listen), Kelly Osbourne, Jennifer Lawrence, Adam Levine, Jessica Alba, and a host of others according to a yahoo article I just read. Some have tried to get them lasered but you still see them say the stars.
Would these women look more attractive without being plastered with tattoos?
Three things, I love it when girls decorate their bodies with jewelry and ink. Both of the women above have probably $10k invested into their ink, or more. Its very well done, the art style suits them and their body, and they obviously both have jobs that allow this (top one looks like an artist herself based on facial tattoos).
Girls that get tattoos just to get them annoy me. Girls that get art done I find very attractive.
If an actor/model/musician can see their tattoo after removal, they need to go to a better doctor or have more sessions. If they're taking about skin pigment, it will likely always be slightly off because they SHOT A LASER AT THEIR SKIN! It is all about choices at that point. If you think about the work you want done, then you should know you won't regret it. Spur of the moment, random flash art is regrettable to say the least. But your regret shouldn't dictate anyone else's choice.
TL/DR: I would marry them. They are attractive to me. I think you should be able to do whatever you want with your own body, but not dictate what others should do.
I'm sure you have seen pics of people who have light skin color where their tats were lasered. That skin will never look the same as your other skin and is even more apparent when you get a tan. It is almost as distracting as the original tat.
Yes I see it as a great canvas covered in graffiti, and no I would not marry a woman covered in that much ink, it my look great now but what will it look like 30-40 years down the line.
You're asking for the male perspective, fair enough, but just thought I would add that I went to a skin laser clinic recently, to talk about something else, and had an interesting convo with the owner. We got to talking about tattoos. He said about 50% of people who get them done regret it within 6 months. He has a colleage who works above a tattoo shop. Tattoos down below, laser removals up above on another floor. This is a fad.
Did you see my update? Tons of celebs get them and regret it. You are right, it has been around and some think it is like a christening into being cool, like smoking. I don't think it makes one cool myself, though I know a lot of people like tats.
Yeah I agree. Not cool to me. Cool is being an outlier, having distinct opinions that are different from the masses, but sticking to them with conviction. They're so commonplace now they're almost generic. It depends what they're of, of course. But butterflies, barbed wire, etc... what do those say about a person, not much. From my doctor I found out that today's dyes are very different - lots of colours, and the ink no longer is carbon from China, which was relatively easy to remove (unless it had been done many years ago). Today's dyes really absorb, apparently. Many more treatments and much more painful to remove. I want to invest in laser removal equipment ;)
I prefer tattoo-less, especially if there are a lot of tattoos on a person and I do think girls would probably look better without them, in general, so yes.
At the same time though, I do think a lot can look good on either gender, but not on the more sexually appealing areas, unless you've got skin discolouration or something and are going to tattoo your natural skin tone colour on it, to correct it or if you're tattooing something that looks natural e. g. if you've got pink nipples and want them to be darker, then I assume getting them tattooed a darker, but still natural, skin tone colour on them (at least for nipples), would be fine.
I think tattoos are highly personal and should be meaningful, well-done and well-placed to enhance a woman's beauty! That said, at a certain point TOO MANY tattoos can begin to decrease a woman's beauty in my opinion. For example, in the above, the Blonde's tattoos covering her boobs is a downer. The Brunette's tattoos enhance her beauty, even her butt crack! LOL!
I don't really have a liking for tattoos overall. It's just that I have a general aversion to tattoos as there are many possibilities to fail miserably like having a poorly drawn one, an awkward body location etc. And there is every possibility that it would become unsightly with age, body size changes and such. So yes, they'd look more attractive without the markings.
I really like tattoos on girls, so long as they're good quality. Now, I think it is often the case that women with lots of ink have other traits that I wouldn't want to be around long term. But not always, and that's becoming less the case all the time.
I think the tattoos on the second girl look better on her than the first one.
I love all natural skin. I have to say tattoos are a sign of low intelligence; whenever I talk to an inker it is obvious. There seems to be something empty in them, also. It seems like a body-hate thing to me akin to cutting yourself. They are compensating for something.
I don't hate tattoos.. But their is nothing more beautiful than a Women with her Bare Skin.. Those acne marks and rashes make it so realistic.. Their stretch marks.. Are just, 😍😍 "My Tigress."
However it's not like I will reject a girl because of her tattoos.. A small one of a few is okay..
But if she is a painted canvas like the pictures you posted consider me out..
Who gives a shit about any girl whose last name is Kardashian? They're not stars, the media whores. Anyway, I say YES, these women would look WAY more attractive without all that ink. NO, I'd never marry a girl with that much stuff on her. And I very much agree... "you don't put a bumper sticker on a Bentley".
I find ink extremely sexy so no these women would not look better with. I don't currently have any ink myself but to celebrate momentous life events I feel that skin modification is an art and those that practice this are true artists who work on the most unforgiving surface. But the most appreciative skin owners'.🖤💙💜💙💛🧡
I doubt that I would strictly refuse to marry a woman based solely on tattoos but it would tilt against me wanting to if other women of equal caliber to my liking were available. I would go with the woman without them first if all else were even.
That is a b. s answer it's not rather the tattoos or not it's the person so when you think want to judge someone start by looking in a mirror that is the only person anyone should judge...
I'm okay with tattoos but coloured tattoos look totally trash to me. It makes to art too messy. Few tattoos are fine and some look even good with full body tattoo but they have great taste in tattoos too.
Some will not like them, but no one has to date anyone. Your opinion is irrelevant to them. Again, you don't have to date them. Expressing yourself, unless hurting others or yourself, is never taking things too far.
I find some ink attactive, but at some point it becomes excessive. Also ladies (and gentlemen) keep in mind that as you age your skin gets progressively saggier, which will eventually distort the originals image (s).
Ya obviously , I can’t see her skin texture instead I see disctating tats... like too much I don’t wanna see a fish when I’m kissing her back though... or dragons when I kiss her arms...
Personal opinion? not such a big fan of tattoos - but someone elses body art is not for me to dictate, and I have seen some very cool looking tattoos and whatnot.
now here's MR. REALMAHFUCKA! These goof bitches just shat all over their bodies, they totally disrespected themselves and it's disgusting. They look mutilated. They are mutilated. Scarred, a scar that forms the illusion of being a picture but a scar nonetheless and an insult to your parents and to creation.
I never said it was my say, your name is now MR. STRAWMAN
I said it's mutilation, which it undeniably is, it is scarring, LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY IT IS A SCAR DO YOU UNDERSTAND? And when you self inflict a scar, that is called SELF MUTILATION. These are facts and they do not care about your feelings or anyone else's
lol dude i just reiterated my previous point because you seem to have ignored it, that's not making a strawman, go read some shit and get a better understanding of logical fallacies and how they work. Like for example, saying 'lots of cultures do it' as a justification for some behavior is A LOGICAL FALLACY. Get it?
@Shamalien you should read what you wrote brainwave. Just because it is a scarrification doesn't mean anything with regard to aesthetic choices.
You get to bitch about it when it's your skin. If someone wants to scar themselves, colour themselves put fish-hooks all through their skin, they are doing it to themselves. your say ends at "Ohhh this isn't my taste" or "hey I like that kind of thing"
Paint is just certain chemicals that create the illusion of a picture.
Just what do you think a picture is? Just like any other method of creating the illusion of an image, it's an art form. They simply do it with inks and scars.
Don't like it, don't get any.
Now, since you are such a fan of straw-men - can I offer you a cigarette?
You guys are fighting but why? I'm asking if you would date or marry a woman with this much tattooing? These girls have so much skin covered with ink they may as well be black.
Whoooa. "So much skin covered in ink they might as well be black."
Please tell me that isn't intended to mean what it sounds like?
As to wonderboy there, he seems to be of the opinion that if he doesn't like a Picasso that makes it not art.
Tattooing is art. You may not like it, or even think it ranks with the dogs playing poker level, but that doesn't change it's basic nature as an art form.
Honestly I do think that tattoos can be very attractive and are on those women. It really depends on how they are done, the woman, and what they are of
Ink is beautiful! (I would much rather Love a Girl who has positive thoughts on tattoos, and be covered in them, rather than Love a Girl who has "Blank" skin, and have negative thoughts on tattoos) I've got them, I'd hope She'd be okay with it.
Maybe this is wrong of me to say but these girls are very sexy and I would have no issues taking them to bed BUT I wouldn’t want to take them home to mother.
I personally think it depends on the tattoos. They suit some people but not others. Also I think tattoos are way too common now. It used to be unusual and exciting but now it’s just ordinary.
Both of those girls are attractive, and I think their tattoos are beautiful. So yes, I would date them. Usually I don't like tattoos, but that's because people often get ugly or tacky ones in strange places.
Bodies change, but the art store that was used is large enough it will still be appealing. Not to mention that touch ups can change the look of the work to suit the new changes to the body.
@TheKack What that sounds like is these people who keep plastic surgery to keep looking good. But that only works for so long plus at what cost? Are you gonna throw money at your tats for the rest of your life Fred, so that they can tan your hide when you died Clyde and then go hang it on the shed?
Most artists do touch ups for free. But if you do pay it's usually only $30 an hour or so, instead of $100. So, yes. If it is something i want, then what's the problem with that?
I rather have a girl with a lot less tattoos. Ink free is preferable. For me its the romantic and concentration thing that bothers me with a girl that is plastered with tattoos
It's kind of funny... I generally dislike any tattoos on woman but right now there is this girl around that has way to much of them... but I so freaking want her. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I don't usually plan that long term but if everything else is good I could probably stomach some tats on an old lady. From what I have seen, really old couples must and do handle even worse things than that.
Honestly I would say they look beautiful either way. The tats are very well designed. They are seriously detailed and visualize their deep aesthetic desires.
I personally have 2 tattoos on both forearms and I love tattoos on other people even woman. I’m not sexually attracted to women although I do love a woman with tattoos such a beauty
Yes! I love nice tattoos, they are interesting and tell a story. And yes, I would marry someone with tattoos, but it would not have an influence on my decision.
I think tattoos look hot on girls in their 20s but look really haggard as they age. Tattoos are more of a masculine thing in general in my opinion. They just look more bad ass on men as they age.
Private parts are sensitive, so I don't want the girls to suffer in that way, face hand neck tattoos are not advisable. Feet, the rubbing of shoes will destroy the art.
Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
Most Helpful Opinions