Yes
Nope
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Uuuuuh that's really on a case to case basis, not a simple yes or no.
Typically it just comes across as someone who dosent think things through, is impulsive and dosent plan for the future just "living in the moment".
I think there is reason most single moms, women with high body counts and almost every stripper have a bunch of random unrelated small tattoo's.
Also seems some do it so they have an excuse to show off their body, almost like they are lying to themselves about being a voyeur/exhibitionist.
Some come across as desperate to be noticed, and of course some seem to have no personality and adopt tattoo's as a substitute.
Girls with a few small ones, or large peice that took forethought and planing, or girls that can hide them under normal clothes are hot tho. Like she has tattoo's you've never seen that she can surprise you with are cool. That's more like a lady in the streets and a freak in the sheets vibe.
A lot of random little doodles that look like a school desk/textbook/bathroom stall that appear to have been less than $100, those aren't hot, again just looks like impulse control, like I could get her to sleep with me once if I indices her enough and move quick before she thinks about it.
I have seen some tattoos that are pretty and nice artwork. However I wouldn't necessarily say that it enhances the woman's appearance. The flip side is most tattoos seem to be dumb sketches and poor artwork. The examples are endless. Like the lady who I met who had a solid blue star in the middle of her chest between her breasts. Not sure of the artistic value there. Then I saw a lady in a restaurant who had some solid tattoo work going up her neck that showed over her collar. No artistic value and it just looked like ink.
Maybe when you're young.
But as you get old, maybe you will regret it. I heard that some COULD regret it as when someone gets old, their skin tends to sag, especially as they hit their senior or over the hill years.
When picking a Tat, I think one has to really think about what it's going to be because isn't it somewhat permanent? ! I don't know though, as I've never had one. I never dared it, but honestly, for me, I like a clean look, so for me, it makes no difference. Maybe to some people they like it or they are more attracted? I don't know, but to me, especially if it's not done well, they tend to look DIRTY to me, no offense.
☮
They look like shit. Why not put them on your face, forehead and neck? Mother nature designed women so that men would be attracted to them. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
So very hot!
Opinion
125Opinion
Only if it’s a beautiful tattoo perfectly placed but on most people it’s just any old trash picture and it has the opposite effect.
Depends on the woman and the tattoos.. not everyone look better with but usually or more often I do find them good looking
But I have also met women who I found to be less good looking cause of her tattoos
Once again folks, times have changed. When I started training with a medical examiner in 1980, the accepted opinion was that tattoos were a sign of someone trying to belong. More common among men who led a more coarse life. Not common among females. Tattoo on genitalia was a sign of sexually inadequacy. The most striking example I saw was a man with hypospadia who had a pair of boxers tattooed over the area naturally covered by boxers to include his foreskin. During my tenure with the ME I never saw a female with tattooed genitalia. But as I said time have changed. People are doing many things to adorn themselves or attain the"Barbie" image. My opinion "Leave it alone". Unless you are intersexed, there is a possibility that it is perfect just like it is. Just an opinion of an old man.
I definitely think women look better without tattoos. In my opinion, any tattoo always diminishes how attractive I'll find any given woman.
It's not a deal-breaker. I don't automatically find a girl unattractive just because she's got a tattoo. And plenty of guys are going to feel completely opposite to how I do on this. But for me... no tattoo has ever made any woman look better. Always worse. Always. So I definitely have a strong belief that women look way hotter with ZERO tattoos.🙂
Some tattoos are worthy demonstrations of the artist's skill. On rare occasions, they command a second look. But let's be serious. If an artist has real skill, they wouldn't be making tattoos for a living.
I've never seen a tattoo that enhanced the appearance of the woman (or man) who has it. In fact, they always detract from the beauty of the human form. Even the best of them are a scar on the flesh. Let's not even talk about how they degrade over time. Lines get blurry. Skin, less smooth. They're a bad idea.
I think it can make a woman look sexier (not prettier, there’s a difference). But I think a tattoo would only work on women who are not CONVENTIONALLY attractive.
There are some people who do find a tomboyish kinda personality and appearance attractive, they could very well find girls with tattoos to be sexy.
For women who are already attractive, a tattoo wouldn’t make much difference. So basically, a tattoo can most likely be appealing to some but generally not to people who are into conventionally attractive women.
I don't know why so many women are getting tattoos these days. I find it extremely unattractive and repulsive. It ruins a woman's body and its sad to see really cute girls having tattoos. It ruins my attractiveness toward them. there's this one instagram girl I follow, her face is super cute but the fact she has tattoos is a turn off. Small tattoos are fine, anything more than that just no.
Some women wear tattoos well and some dont. Same with men. I think with women there is a point though at which you can have too many tattoos. I think on a woman tattoo shouldn't be colored too much. Women have naturally soft and fair skin, most have slim physiques and it all adds to the appeal.
im not against dating a woman with a tatt at all. But size, moderation and design.
The reason why I chose nope is to me it just looks trashy. Not all people should do tattoos and not everything should be a tattoo. I have seen small and tasteful to extrodinare and look just as good. It just depends on the person who is wearing it. This may be updated as soon as I go back and look at it better.
Talk about messing up a good thing…To me, less military, tattoos and trailer park trash are bookends in the same sentence. They are not a fashion statement or a good ad on.
Both tattoos and nose 👃 rings are so passé now. Pendulum was swung back the other way where the clean and blank female Tableau Rosa, rather than the marred female, is both desired and in.
This really isn’t simple enough to be a yes or no question. Like not all tattoos are created equal. Obviously if she had a bunny with top hat as a tramp stamp I’m not going to be into that but if sho got something cute on her arm I’d probably love that.
Also it depends on your body because some things just look better on some people than it does on others.
That said I feel like a few tattoos is cool.
Well not always cool but you get the point
Not really, it goes both ways , some
Girls look good with tatts and some don’t , so it just depends on how she presents herself , I knew a beautiful girl that didn’t have any tatts and she was gorgeous to my eyes , when i ran into her again after a few months she was covered in tatts and I wasn’t really attracted toward her anymore l, but I know girls that do have tatts and they look sexy as fuck so again it goes both ways
No. I don't like tattoos on women. If she has a small one here, a small one there, like on her wrist or shoulder it's not a problem. But keeping it real, I find large area tattoos on women to be unattractive, like the whole sleeves or complete layouts between their boobs or all over their boobs or back.
I don’t think it’s relevant to what’s attractive, the tattoo itself could be hot or not the person is still the same but it does on the other hand give a statement and could give you an idea about her personality or state of mind which could change over time too. But generally speaking and for myself I don’t like them it’s not a deal breaker but I don’t like them especially the ones that have a hidden message or an inside phrase or quote about some dude.
Exactly the opposite. A woman without tats is self-confident in her own body while a woman with tats has, for some reason, the need to try to improve her looks.
No. It's not the tattoo that makes a woman beautiful. It IS somewhat sexy to have a tatoo or two but nothing too extensive (like those creeps whose whole bodies are covered in ink). The most beautiful woman on the planet Melissa Benoist has 3 tattoos but they're not the reason I like her.
I don't care for them. They definitely don't make a woman more attractive. There is nothing more beautiful than a woman's delicate, unblemished skin.
I have not met a female yet, that looked hotter than she did before. After she got a tattoo, tattoos are not sexy and as a female gets older they only get less attractive.
It’s beautiful. My friends are tattoo masters and even my mom got a tattoo last year but I can’t. I feel like I’ll eventually grow out of it, so I’d rather not get one.
Of course. It's not just gonna make you hot if you already ugly. But a girl who's already hot can only be hotter with a tattoo really. Unless ya know they are super extreme been all over.
You can also add your opinion below!