Speaking on the opposite perspective, I'd say yes, a lot of tattoos on a man are a dealbreaker for me. One or two is fine (I'd prefer none honestly), but if they're small or actually "significant" and not stupid then I can probably see past them. Whole sleeves or ones that cover your body? Nuh-uh. All that shows me is that you're rather self-absorbed and a bit irresponsible with money, since you blew through God-knows how many thousands of dollars to just ink up your body.
Not to mention a LOT of people end up wanting to pay to get them removed, which is equally as expensive as SO much more painful.
Most Helpful Opinions
Omgeee i always loved brittanya. she's he only one can pull of tatss but she looks diff with the pink hair. I prefer the red on her. I dislike a lot of tats on guys but shr pulls them
Off
Yes, women with tattoos can be very attractive. I've always liked the look of full sleeve tattoos. As long as someone's tattoos aren't morbid, racist or otherwise obscene, I'm good with it.
On the other hand though, I don't find tattooed women "more attractive" than non-tattooed women. Tattooed women are attractive, just in a different way. To me, neither is "more attractive" than the other. But I am not opposed to tattoos at all. I see the skin as a blank canvas for people's own artistic expression if they so choose to do so. When done tastefully, I have no issue at all.
I personally find a lot of Tattoos to be unattractive, but there would really have to be a lot of them for it to be a dealbreaker.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
220Opinion
there's no option to say the tats are fine lol
I love tattoos, I find them to be incredibly hot, when done tastefully.
Hers are fine... kinda. Belly tats are a bad idea all round, they dont look good and they will stretch and deform more than any other tattoo except for one on your palm, and even that would simply fade faster rather than deform faster.
Belly tats are especially a bad idea for women, considering we're known for having the power of over stretching our stomachs to hold a child... ya know.
Hers are also either all faded, or poor quality black ink, they're not vibrant, or contrasted enough to have any real shape or form from a distance. Writing doesn't have to be legible from a distance but it has to at least be readable. (It doesn't have to but to look nice aesthetically it kinda does)
the faces on her arms... oh god. Bad decision. Sure, get a portrait tattooed onto your skin if thats really what you want byt my god pick your fucking artist, fork out the cash for that kind of thing. You wouldn't hire a cartoonist to paint a realistic portrait, why do people hire tattooists that specialise in anything but faces to do portraits.
I will repeat, I love tattoos! I have a tattoo! I think they look fucking amazing... when done right.
And her arms look great, if only there was more contrast and less same same black all over the place... but the rest of her just doesn't. there's no nice way to say that.Some small ones are fine or can be sexy. But gaudy, all over and big like that, I don't like. I mean if it's a woman I really like and love and she has them, I'd be fine. But as far as preferences go. I prefer no tatoos or just small one's. It just makes the woman look"rough" to me. And to me, the female body can be a work of art on a sexy woman. The skin is so sensual and I love the curves. All those huge tatoos likes messes up the beauty already there. A find a woman's sexy, sensual, soft skin more beautiful than any darn ink for sure.
When cuddling or affectionate with a woman whether after sex or just being loving and runnng my hard over her thighs, shoulders, back, etc. I love to just work my eyes across her skin and body, like admiring a beautiful, sensual landscapre, her body is a wonderland. When a woman is tatted up like that, you're seeing some damn ink over her beautiful skin. I don't like that visual "interference". I find that interference. A woman tatted up like that is like spray painting a beautiful, marble stature or wall. It's like putting huge permanent bumper stickers all over a waxed, shiny beautiful new porsche. You don't do that do you?The problem isn't how many, but the kind. If her entire torso is covered, but it's all one big tatt with a single artistic theme, that's fine. But id she's covered in what looks like graffiti, it's off. THIS is good: www.inkme.tattoo/.../...gns-for-men-and-women3.jpg tnimage.taiwannews.com.tw/.../5ab3d86d85280.jpg www.dubuddha.org/.../...Girl-by-Nice-Guy-Chris.jpg
THese, however, are not
preen.inquirer.net/.../...ttoos-e1498469080794.jpg tattoo-journal.com/.../...-for-women34-650x556.jpg www.form.ink/.../...Designs-For-Women-766x584.jpegI'm not a tattoo fan, but I respect a person to choose for themselves. I know that the Bar/restaurant that I manage the rule is with some exception that arm, shoulder, back, leg, neck tattoo's must be covered at work. I have a couple of girls who almost have to wear coverall's because of the number of tats they have. We also do not permit piercings outside of ears and tiny nose items. All others have to be removed during work. Girls with small tats in places like ankles, wrists or lower back are permitted. I myself have a small (my birth sign Libra) tat on my lower back. It is maybe an area 1" square.
For me it's a compatibility thing. I have no tattoos. Though I've thought about it, I've never really even been close to getting one. I can't see the appeal of paying someone to jab me hundreds if not thousands of times with a needle. I also can't think of anything that I feel needs to be imprinted on my flesh for the rest of my natural life.
So when I see a woman with a lot of tattoos, regardless of how attractive she may be otherwise. I can't help but think we are two very different very types of people.This girl looks like a model, a lot of women with just as many tattoos aren’t gonna look as good as her 😂 I don’t like the tattoos she has but it doesn’t effect her looks much because she is already pretty attractive.
But generally I think it all depends on the tattoos, not the quantity.Honestly this girl is a babe! Tattoos just add to that but the hips though to me are a turn off... I don't find that hips that big are attractive but to each their own. Tattoo wise, depending on the tattoos and the girl who has them (tattoos have to look good for that body) they usually are very attractive I find, unless they don't go with the person, body and if they are on the face (hate and can't stand face tattoos)
why are all the pictures of the same woman? anyway, i dont really care, i personally found my friend attractive both before and after she got tattoos. sometimes they add to a person's attractiveness for me, but cliche "sleeves" and overused tattoos like a dolphin or cheesy quotes are ugly to me
Okay well why the fuck would you even put a poll up and then make it ridiculously one-sided without any second options.
First off, fuck you for being a hypocritical narrow-minded troll who only gives the option to give the answers she wants to hear.
And second, yes, as a tattooed man myself (not that tattooed but still), I would gladly date/fuck a chick with tattoos.Generally don't like so many. I think a single tattoo, for example, placed on a key area of a body can create an interesting focal point, especially if it's on a very beautiful part of her body. But when the tats are kind of scattered about, it starts to look very busy and distracting to me.
Yeah, sure. I prefer them without, to be honest, or with few ones, but sleeves and such can be sexy as hell... That girl is so beautiful by the way, she reminds me of that transgender girl who's a makeup artist? Maybe it is her? I don't know, but she's extremely beautiful...
Lol!! She is amazing!!! I would prefer less tattoos and less... um... fat... lol! She just needs to tuck in that ass a little bit... haha! And the tattoos I really don’t mind if she has lagitamite reasons for them all and not like “hey I want a tattoo. Should I do it on my chest so I can show you my tits? What do you think?”
Really depends on what they are, I do like to see skin, but tattoos can be cool. I used to be a lifeguard and saw a 45-55 year old guy with a tramp stamp, that was a terrible experience.
If a girl has more tattoos than skin I probably won't be into it. Also if she wears as much makeup as the girl in the pics then I would avoid her more for that than the tattoosMaybe... if it's strategically placed and not an eye sore, and not tons of them, but maybe one or two small ones. That would be cool. To each there own, but seeing a person with tattoos it just makes me think of all the ink that was forced into the skin to make that and it makes my stomach flip.
Not to mention I have a phobia of needles and it instantly causes me to image the process the person went through to have that done. That also makes me skin crawl.
But that's just me.I don't dig tattoos AT ALL but, if she's just got a couple of small ones in nearly out of the way places, that's fine. If she's a walking freakshow with them all over her arms, legs, tits, ass, back and/or face, bye-bye!! Same with piercings. 1 in each ear, okay. Small one in the side of her nose, eeeeh, okay. If she's a walking pachinko board, no good at all for me!!
It wouldn't be a dealbreaker if I genuinely love her, even if she was missing an arm or something but I can see that it would be off putting in the beginning when I first meet her and I think it would be very difficult to become close to her with all those tattoos
I believe the only way girls with so many tattoos look attractive is if they are barely wearing anything... and have an ok body.. otherwise they don’t seem all that attractive... in my opinion...
And your photo examples prove my point... they’re all practically naked in order to even look good at all..Yes but not an excessive amount and i follow that redhead on ig lol she clickbaits everyone and post way to much when first got ig i turned her post notifications of cause it got so annoying never turned them back on to this day its been a while since i been on her page
I find clear skin to be sexier :) because i really admire the human body as it is naturally.. So beautiful. Its just perfect.
I dont like to add artificial stuff on an already perfect body.no, I don't. one or two maybe, but insane amounts is repulsive to me. How theyre displayed (like up there ^^^), makes a big difference, too. those women look like whores (yes, I mean that) and it makes it that much, MUCH worse to me.
Learn more
Most Helpful Opinions