
I don't think they should be required to wear uniforms either.
Please share your views!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
I'm on the fence with the voting part and I will tell you why. Normally I will be extremely outraged and everything would have been as if it was World War II. However, I probably wouldn't even really be outraged. I'll probably laugh. And as I laugh I will take my kids out of school get my boy to be in his pants. He can even pick his favorite pants. And then I will tell the rest of those crazy behind. They are mentally ill and they need to get their head checked. And anybody who was dumb enough to send their kid to that school then mentally ill as well. That's all.
Would you get your girl to be in a skirt too?
Only if she wants to. Is she feels comfortable especially during the summer then that's up to her. If she doesn't feel comfortable then I'm not going to force her. As long as she likes wearing skirts and dresses or whatever then fine. I'm not going to drive myself Bonkers about it. It's when if God forbid my son won't start till about wearing a skirt that's when I will have an issue with.
Why is it okay for girls to wear pants but not for boys to wear skirts? Wouldn't both be cross dressing according to Deuteronomy 22:5?
Boys shouldn't be wearing skirts, it pertains to women. They have pants that are designed for women only and you can often tell the difference. Crisscrossing is pertaining to what is originally made. You have male robes and you have female robes. Do not male robes look similar to dresses for men? There's a reason why we often Associated as male dresses. But they're not dresses. Their robes designed for men. That's why they are not made for women. Robes made for women are woman a robes. They shouldn't be worn by a man. And neither should a woman where what proteins to a man.
Remember back then men and women had certain outfits to wear. Women were not wearing dresses like that. They wore what was appropriate to where at that time and environment. The only reason why it would be appropriate for females to not wear pants because as women, we are naturally open down there and we need air to breathe. Men also need that put himself because both male and female are at risk of developing yeast infections and other problems.
Oh. What if a woman wears male designed pants instead of female designed pants tho? Would she then she wrong?
Then yes she would be because it's not designed for female it's design for male. Now if we seen a male cross-dressing in panties and wearing thongs, fishnet stockings, dresses, high heels, we would know that is a man who more and likely isn't right in the head, unless he is on a spy mission or something. But we would often assume that person is not mentally straight.
True. What about men wearing kilts? Some kilts are masculunely designed and some kilts are femininely designed.
I would only feel outrage because they are being forced. It should be the choice for both sexes
Because it is an involentry action. Girls are technically allowed to wear slacks anyway in a uniformed school, but forcing the girls to not wear skirts or the guys to not wear pants is disgusting. Not saying that its disgusting for guys to wear skirts or girls to wear pants but it disgusting that they have no choice.
Not in some schools. Some girls are still forced to wear skirts.
Then thats disgusting. Let people wear what uniform they want to.
Public school? Yes. Private school? No. In the case of private schools, if parents don't like it, they're free to take their money elsewhere. In the case of public schools, however, they have no such choice.
Opinion
16Opinion
I would be only a little outraged and not because boys are in skirts or girls are in pants but because their forcing them. You should be able to wear the style of uniform you want especially since their the ones who pay for them.
What do you mean outraged the other way around? You mean outraged that girls wear skirts and boys wear pants as a requirement in many schools?
If it was for a day or even a week to see how the other half lives I wouldn’t have a problem with it. But I think it would have to be something that parents would have to be on board with before even considering it.
I would camly organize to have everyone with a school job who supported the plan fired.
I would be pissed if it was forced but if it was your choice and it was for a protest I would be fine with it.
If it happens, our initial reaction will be negative because we are accustomed to see skirts on girls' body and pants on boys. As time passes we will mentally accept the change.
No outrage. I'd calmly take my kid from school and homeschool!
Unless this were Scotland where the guys are used to wearing skirts. :- )
If they want to wear a skirt, they should & if she don't, they should wear pants. Not be required to do either.
I agree with your sentiment, but I feel like that's kind of dodging the original question.
"Not be required to do either" as they can wear either or. (Not nothing at all. That's not what I meant.)
Why didn't you select D then?
Oh. You voted C I see. Nevermind. I misread it.
It would only be outrageous (and discriminatory) if girls were allowed to wear skirts or trousers but boys were only allowed to wear trousers.
This would be something that every parent SHOULD be outraged over... and I wouldn't be surprised to see actually happen, in the insane times we're in
Public schools are a big welfare program and should be abolished.
On one hand it would be pretty weird to force people to wear skirts or pants but kilts are rad so it probobly wouldn't be that bad. Plus it would encourage more guys to not skip leg day.
There's nothing wrong wearing pants for boys and girls but a boy wearing skirts is disgusting and totally unacceptable.
Your double standards is disgusting. You are a major sexist.
The Bible clearly forbids transvestism and you support it for females.
Pants is unisex clothing. When you go the store, you can't tell the difference between women and men pants?
I can totally tell the difference when I buy a pair of pants. Girls have more padding in the rear and they have small pockets. Just sayin hahaha
@Nathan_Prescott: Besides women pants are in the women clothing department.
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy Also that haha
What if a woman wears pants that are designed for men then? Would you then be outraged?
No. I just told you pants are unisex clothing. That's like me getting at a woman because she's is wearing a regular t-shirt.
Women pants is makes a woman's body look tighter and sextier since women pants are thin.
What if a woman wears pants that look like men's pants then? Why not be upset?
If a man wore pants that looked like women's pants, you'd be mad. You should be mad too when women wear men's pants or ties or buzz cut their hair.
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy I agree with @Cryptic-Game. I think you're holding a double standard over women's clothing.
Yes. Because a woman's pants is super thin and tight. It isn't made for man. That's why I oppose skinny jeans. As far hair is concerned a woman should have long hair and man short hair but the Bible doesn't obligate neither gender concerning how long or short they want their hair. Its up to the individual
@Nathan_Prescott: I'm wearing jeans right now. If I wear to take off my jeans and my sister puts on my pants you wouldn't be able to tell if she's wearing men or women pants. I take my sister's jean and wear them, then you can clearly see I'm wearing women jeans. Women pants have very distinct designs fit for women only.
At least not from a distance
I would be a little outraged. I think it's wrong, but honestly, I don't really have a good defence.
I think it would make us better people there where days where little boys in dipers did and the boys that could talk behaved and I believe it will help us as boys behave the right way
If it were a public school, yes. If it were a private school for trannys I wouldn’t mind
I think it's really good and nice that girl wear pants and boy wear skirt
Yeah cause how do you hide a boner
Imagine wanting to hide a boner 😤😤😤
Unless they were kilts then yeah total outrage
Yes I would, the idea is ridiculous.
And we should wear uniforms.
Well, why specifically is it ridiculous?
@Nathan_Prescott Young men don't wear skirts Mr. Prescott, and nor should they start doing so. Young ladies may wear trousers but they should wear skirts to school.
@Mr_Peterson I fully agree that it's wrong for men to wear skirts. I was kinda hoping for a better reason than "It's not normal".
Is it really hurting anyone if men wear skirts? Or what makes men wearing skirts morally wrong?
Again, I agree that men shouldn't. I was just hoping someone could help me justify my belief.
@Nathan_Prescott: Its a moral social construct. Skirts make men look feminine and like a little sissy.
My bad. I thought I was answering on my own box.
@Hispanic-Cool-Guy No worries. Thanks for giving a better answer than "It's not normal" :)
Scottish men wear skirts though.
@Cryptic-Game Scottish men are féminine and little sissies.
Hahaha jkjk
@Cryptic-Game: To us Americans then Scottish men are feminine. Clothing morally is subjective to the society one lives in.
@Nathan_Prescott my belief is that we don't wear skirts and that's all there is to it.
@Mr_Peterson I don't feel like that's a very strong argument :/
No one should be forced to wear something
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions