+1 yWell for the ones that use the service to make money sure they clearly find it okay. I had to look up the stats because I don't know much about Only Fans but what I could find was that there were 1.5 million content creators on Only Fans (not sure if all are female but I imagine most are). In the U. S. there are 108,133,727 females over the age of 18. So when I did the math it came out to 0.014 percent of the U. S female population that is a content creator out of all U. S. females over the age of 18 so I conclude that it is not representative of a the majority of U. S. females over the age of 18.
041 Reply- +1 y
1 out of 10,000 women being a lazy whore on OnlyFans is still VERY bad! And even if only 0.1% of those women earn big money, the rest are still earning like $500 to $1,000 extra by being lazy, entitled, sh*tty, narcissistic losers who sit on their ass all day, post pictures of their gross disgusting feet, and then think they're entitled to hundreds of dollars for that. And as awful and USELESS to society as these women are, as I said before, the even more useless simps paying these lazy losers money for their foot fungus, are just as awful, if not worse.
And then some women complain about there not being enough female CEOs and world leaders, while simultaneously wanting to get paid thousands of dollars every month by loser men for literally nothing doing but posting their feet online. - +1 y
@MCheetah I don’t disagree with you on that point just that the existence/success of it doesn’t prove a all women think it’s okay to be objectified for profit.
- +1 y
What about all the free porn women post? Many, many, more want to join OF but they don't have the "courage" to do so.
- +1 y
Let's talk about the legions if women who get flown out to Dubai for big dollar fucks.
- +1 y
@whirled_up_girl
I don't think OP was referring to literally all women, though. Just the hypocritical ones who complain about "objectification" if men are enjoying their bodies for free, but won't complain once money and simping's involved. - +1 y
@KrakenAttackin Okay well those women sure but I don’t think that applies to all women. I personally don’t think it’s okay and wouldn’t do it and no women that I know in real life do or condone that kind of behavior. Unless like @Mcheetah said your referring to women who do that stuff and complain about being objectified. I agree that would it hypocritical to do that.
- +1 y
I do think ALL women live off of attention and are selectively "angered" about "objectification" depending on who is giving them attention and/or what the women are getting out of it.
- +1 y
@whirled_up_girl
We literally had a Disney+ show where the angry misandrist c*nt protagonist, She Hulk, complained that being cat-called in the street made her more of an expert at controlling her anger, than her suicidal, fugitive, abused cousin, The Hulk. And not three episodes later, is twerking with Megan Thee Stallion in the same episode. In addition to several men she's raped and catfished on the show, that no one ever brings up as being morally wrong.![Does the existence/success of Only Fans prove women are OK with being objectified as long as they are being paid?]()
![Does the existence/success of Only Fans prove women are OK with being objectified as long as they are being paid?]()
![Does the existence/success of Only Fans prove women are OK with being objectified as long as they are being paid?]()
![Does the existence/success of Only Fans prove women are OK with being objectified as long as they are being paid?]()
"Don't objectify me, but watch me shake dat ass and drop it like it's hot."
So yes, LOTS of women are hypocritical pieces of sh*t like this, to where it unironically makes it onto Disney+ and in front of children. - +1 y
@KrakenAttackin Okay, well your certainly entitled to your opinion.
- +1 y
@MCheetah Yeah I know both genders are going to have it's share of low lifes. What do you and @KrakenAttackin want women like me to do about it hang my head in shame because members of my gender can be low lifes. Claim myself to also be a low life because of the low lifes that exist in my gender?
- +1 y
@whirled_up_girl
All *you* gotta do, is just continue not being a low-life and *assuming you're not already with someone), you'll find the right partner. Guaranteed (at least, since you're female, it is). There's not too many of us people with dignity and integrity left, nowadays. So many women want to be e-whores and so many men think it's okay to be a simp/paypig/emasculated loser. - +1 y
@Mcheetah Here is my first suggestion for you. Switch to decaf as fast as you can. I am not even sure you are mad at the right people. I don't believe you need to be mad at women on that site by the sound of it. It sounds like your mad at how much they are making. But they don't just make up their own salary. Dudes are the ones paying for it. Why would they care about becoming a CEO? They can potentially make way more showing their tits than sitting at a desk pushing papers all day. And why do you keep going back to feet? You brought that up a lot. That just tells me you had a relationship end very bad with someone who you got off to her feet but now can't stand it because she broke your heart or it's very simple. You get off to feet currently and don't know how to deal with it mentally. Just chill the fuck out and let life happen. Girls on onlyfans won't ruin anything in your life. Your fine. If you say you just looking out for the females of the world I'll tell you the same. Just chill. If that "cash me outsside" girl can do it then there is plenty of room for other to hop on board and make millions as well. The first year that "cash me outsside" was on onlyfans, I believe she made something like 55 million dollars. She screenshot her financials and posted it somewhere to shut a dude just like you up. Don't get so worked up about the well being of these girls. They are doing way better than most of us.
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin and why are you worried about these girls posting free or paid content? It's super fuckin easy. If you don't enjoy seeing naked girls, don't get on onlyfans. If these girls work hard to stay lean and fit, which isn't easy work, it takes a lot, and all they want to do is show off how good their hard work looks. Let them. Why be mad at that. You really don't have anything else in your life to be upset about? Really? If you actually answered that you don't have anything else to be mad at, then how TF are you going to mad a naked girls on the internet. You think when they are not being naked they just sit and print counterfeit money all day? You think they just get their money from printing counterfeit bills? How about no. How about if nobody wanted to see them, dudes wouldn't pay money to see them. It's not about how hard you work. It's about how smart you work. They are making a living showing their tits on the internet. That's pretty fucking smart. If you had a juicy pair of tits that could potentially make you tens of thousands of dollars with I'm sure you would be flaunting it too. They found a way to make it work for them. Don't hate them for their choice of making money every month.
- +1 y
@KennethNoisewater
Look dude. I've never seen you on this site before. It sounds like you're a simp, so I already don't respect you or take you seriously for that, in case you assume I'm supposed to take you seriously in any way.
The problem here, is the degradation of society and everyone who is happily contributing to it in their own selfish, self-serving, narcissistic, destructive way. If you want to be a proud beta male with no self-respect and live your life throwing away money at useless lazy whores, you do you. I'm not stopping you. But don't tell me I'm supposed to sit here and be glad to see the fall of Western civilization.
Your assumptions are also fucking retarded. I said feet, because they spam this shit CONSTANTLY on Instagram. They tag it as everything under the sun, and I fucking HATE seeing nasty ass feet, so every single time, I report their accounts so Instagram can shut them down. But there are thousands of them on there. And that's not even OF; that's Instagram. That must be like, 1% of the content on OF if that many Instagram profiles have this shit on there, with tag spam related to everything in the universe that isn't foot porn.
So yeah. I don't respect you because you don't respect yourself; I don't give a fuck about your opinions; and you don't matter to me or what I think about OF, just so we're clear Homer Simpson. You go off and be a paypig THAT way, and live your own life, okay? - +1 y
@whirled_up_girl where do I even start with you? You broads are suppose to stick together. You were trying to agree with these two doofuses the whole time and they were flipping you shit. You should have just stood up for the ladies on this one. Are you just not smart enough to see the pretty amazing business plan they all have? Are you too busy making 10 million a year working at a desk all day. I'll answer for you. No on all those questions. Dude. This wave won't last forever. Why wouldn't you join them. Showing your boobs for 20 grand a month is not worth it? Jesus. I want your life. Damn. I would get me a boobs job and start posting on onlyfans if I thought I had a chance at that kind of money. 20k a month is what a lot of these girls start at. Some make 3 million a month. It's insane. Anyone who calls 3 million a month a failure and not going to do anything with their life should be locked up because your legally retarded and a danger to society. Let these girls make their money. Let these dude pay to see their boobs. The only thing forcing these girls to do it is the luxury to but a $800,000 house for them selves, one for their parents and one for each sibling and doing it all at the age of 18. Yeah, what pieces of shit these girls are. Maybe it's not all their first choices on what to do but why throw shade when they can do more for their families now then try and wait it out hoping to eventually get a CEO position and maybe they will end up having enough to put their mom in a home before she dies.
- +1 y
@MCheetah you want to talk about not respecting me and not taking me seriously? You use words like "simp" you toolbag. Your the definition of douche. But your gonna try and hide that behind your internet tough guy persona? It's not working. you're a douche. That "simp"le. Also I'm changing your name to Lenny until I'm done with you, you big dummy.
Well, onlyfans isn't going to be the demise of western civilization. That reminds me of everyone agreeing with we needed to build a wall to secure the southern border because Mexicans were going to come and take all of our jobs. Lenny, did you think that was the truth? I knew you did, you big dummy. Ill give you a hint a huge portion of those Mexicans that are here illegally. They work doing hard labor. They throw up drywall in new construction or are in the fruit fields in 100+ degree weather. I don't know where your caretaker is right now Lenny but just so you big dumb ass knows, your to big a dumb to do those jobs. It's too hot for you out there. Women on onlyfans is almost the same idea. They are out here doing the job that you are too big and dumb to do. I promise nothing your capable of doing is gonna stop these girls. Are you afraid some 18 year old girl is going to come and take your job, dummy? I don't believe you probably have a job. These girls are not going to crumble our economy. They won't overthrow our government. They just want to show us their boobs.
My assumptions are retarded, Lenny? No, Lenny. You're just dumb. Your way of trying to weasel dick your way out of these feet dilemma was about as smart as you, Lenny. My quickest way to prove you're a creep is My Instagram doesn't have a single foot in my feed, you fruitbasket.(I have to to send this one now. I guess I'm killing to hard for one reply. Do worry Lenny, part two is already done) {to be continued} - +1 y
You don't get spammed with feet because Instagram is picking on you because "you hate feet". God, that was weird you even tried that one to be completely honest. Or did you mean you like pictures of spam rubbed all over feet. You hungry Lenny. You big sick foot lovin', spam eating dummy, you.
Ok so we definitely found that your a twisted little dummy but let me end this because it is probably nap time for you. I really don't need your respect. I want to clarify I don't have an onlyfans. I have never had an onlyfans. For no other reason than I never remember it when I'm about to park this beefbus down in tuna town. I always just hit up a free porn site, like God intended. So that whole argument you tried is void. It was fun making fun of you Lenny, go tell someone you you need to take your Helmut off and you need to take a nap. Remember Lenny- you'll never hit a home run if you don't swing. Better luck next time slugger. Goodnight, Lenny. - +1 y
@MCheetah @Lenny You feel that heat, son! Lenny, heat means hot. Hot referring to the fire I was just spitting in your direction. You want to get that diaper changed, Lenny and let the grown ups handle it from here? Why don't you go scroll your weird ass Instagram that Instagram picks what's on your feed, you clown shoe. Oh shit, that was probably a trigger for you, wasn't it? Damn. What else are trigger words. Oh shit, what does "kick ass" do for you? That probably really messes with you, you Twinkie. Your just a big dumb animal, aren't you. Well keep licking windows, Lenny. I will miss you. #footlocker4Lenny
- +1 y
@KennethNoisewater
This cuck said something to you, but I blocked him, cause he's literally not worth the time, whatever he posted. It was like three or four messages in a row, it looks like. Don't give the soyboys validation; no matter what you say, they'll think they matter if you respond to them. - +1 y
@KrakenAttackin
That message was for you, Kraken. This stupid f*cking site makeover ruined the tag I directed to you. I was referring to that Noisewater simp. - +1 y
@MCheetah @KrakenAttackin The funniest part of that whole thing was that he thought I was agreeing both of you, I mean I was on some points but not on the main point. I honestly don't mind having debates with users like either of you, we may not agree on a lot of things but at least we don't feel the need to fling insults at each other to try and make our points.
- +1 y
@whirled_up_girl
There's nothing more cringey to me than a spineless, emasculated soyboy and self-admitted simp, trying to puff his chest out on the internet, expecting people to take him seriously whatsoever. The cognitive dissonance of the most emotionally soft pussies and manchildren trying to argue and act tough on the internet, absolutely astounds me. No one is going to respect someone like that who can't even respect himself.
I'm not even trying to apply overused words like "beta male" to him, but I legitimately can't think of any other more accurate, nor polite, terms to describe people like this. I can't even feign enough respect to read whatever he responded with. He's literally not worth it. - +1 y
@MCheetah Bravo!
- +1 y
@MCheetah he was right. You sound like a clown. You really can't be real with trying to punk him while your using words like "beta male" can you? And I don't want it to seem like I am picking sides or anything but it clearly show that "simp" punking you pretty bad and it looks like you had more than enough time to read what he wrote but then you said you blocked him? He made you his bitch just now and the best you can't do back to that "beta-male" is block him. I'm almost positive that makes you his Beta-bitch. I'm curious where you got your Keyboard black belt, Beta Bitch? Damn. Tough loss "simp" if I was you I would probably try and lose all your keyboard warrior lingo like "Simp" and "beta-male" and get some tampons for your booty hole. Because from way over here it looks like you just got effed in your b-hole. Also, I'm just going to guess a keyboard warrior like yourself won't be able to handle this one either and i just gonna get blocked from you as well. Maybe try and be less of a Beta Bitch and take what you dish out. That's just an idea. Or quit acting like your cool saying Simp and Beta male.
- +1 y
@MCheetah man, as I continue to see this crazy display of a E-spanking you received, I have to give it to the dude you blocked. Earlier you said Instagram loads your feed with feet pictures, so you actually believe that's how that works? Like, you're not messing with him when you say that? You gotta be because that was some awfully dumb thinking. So how things pop up is stuff related to what you have searched previously. You have to be looking up foot stuff for that to show on your feed. You are stressing me out with this way of thinking you have. Anyway, then you throwaway a chance of fighting that piece of insta-foot-knowledge you just threw down because then you straight up tag the dude you blocked and blame the site for doing it? Jesus effin simp-beta-instafoot. Dude, it's embarrassing how bad you want to seem really cool to I'm guessing 14-16 year olds judging by your "hip" keyboard lingo. I know if I was a 14 year old girl you would sound pretty tough to me.
- +1 y
Are you encouraging this tough guy? Are you catfishing all of us right now? Are you a 14 year old girl as well? Damn. Well I guess everyone need a hero. I am not sure if I have high hopes in you either. Gonna leave @whirled_up_girl out of this one. She seems confused already. Trying to figure out if she even knows what's going on here. I thought that blocked dude did her the most justice out of this bunch but I think she has fallen victim to the insta-foot warriors lingo too. Damn. That foot dude is good.
- +1 y
@dantheman1118 you are so right
- +1 y
@dantheman1118
Again, why do you people think I give a flying fuck what you have to say or what you probably spent 30 minutes typing that I never bothered to read? You LITERALLY do not fucking matter. Not to other people on the internet, not to people who know you, not to your father who wasted perfectly good sperm on you, and ESPECIALLY not to me. You should feel honored I even bothered to type THIS to you, because it was probably a perfectly good waste of two minutes. - +1 y
First off @suzzieQ thank you ma'am. It's insane what people get mad about these day. It really is 1 step easier than easy to avoid seeing things like boobs on onlyfans. You just have to do one very minor thing to not see it. All you got to do is not go to onlyfans. Also for these guys, one in particular but I'm about to handle this borderline sex offender in a minute, to shame women because they are able to legally make money by letting dudes see their juicy tits for a monthly subscription is insane. I'm a dude too. I'm not blessed with a badunk and boobs but no shame for making some cash and letting dudes who want to see, see. I'm not a lucky one that has potential to make millions a month by doing that. I can accept that. Why these couple of Tinkerbell's can't figure it out is weird to me. And it seems like twinkletoes here tries to use his keyboard black belt to be intimidating or something. Actually I just got a DM about his most recent post that I need to go handle. Thank you for your compliment.
- +1 y
@MCheetah Why am I getting DMs about you when I'm offline I got three different DMs saying that you think my father has perfect ejaculate. See that's not exactly how you insult someone where I'm from unless you trying to go out on a date, Richard Simmons. You trying to break a sweat with my dad, Doogie Howser MD? Well my dad doesn't roll that way. My dad is way more "simp"le. See what I did there? I made the joke as dumb as you. But to get serious now you trying do go on a date with my pops? You think you are still in prison, Fiddy Cent? Holy shit, look I retired from the internet for the night. I just smoked some dabs and really shouldn't be on here insulting you because I know you can't get the visual of, as you say, my "fathers perfect sperm" out of your cum infested brain and you can't stop licking your lips as I talk to and I can't tell if you just have extremely bad cotton mouth or what because you have a frothy white cream gathering in the corners of your mouth I guess you could have cotton mouth or... Who knows with you twinkletoes. I want to not end here but I have a reputation to keep and me being high and you trying to rub my upper thigh isn't working for me. I don't need any more people DMing me saying that your trying to mouth rape elderly father. Where does that even come from? What the deal with your father? Why are you trying to mouth rape mine? How accurate is your little picture avatar thing? Totally unrelated to the color you appear in the picture, you know him? Like you have met him and everything? Have you ever rated his "perfect sperm" before? Yeah I bet you have, Tough-Actin-Tanactin. Spoiler that last name you have is a foot fungus powder. My jokes are like onions. They have layers. I'm high. I'm out.
- +1 y
@KennethNoisewater I feel bad for your future daughters, for a simp of a man to defend this type of behavior as a man, for women to make life ruining decisions instead of working a job or being a house wife & a mother. You should just cut your balls off at this point.
- +1 y
@dantheman1118 you could not roast anyone to save your life. Can a anyone read what you even said? Do you need Google translate is this a language barrier all I see is extreme LONG WALLS of paragraphs.
Did you finish school or are you just like this, typical FOB behavior? - +1 y
@KennethNoisewater Idiots like you are why we are in such a state of moral decay and weakness. Good times make for weak men, and you exemplify a weak man.
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin
I wouldn't refer to those Noisewater and Dantheman simps as "a man."
"Male" or "sperming person" are more accurate terms for those failures of life. - +1 y
Tttttrt
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin and @MCheetah are you two shit stains still talking right now? Jesus. You two are a couple class acts that want to be lickin the bottom of my shoes by the end of this.@MCheetah I take that back. I know how you get around feet and don't want you to get hard or something from that. Stay away from my feet. And please don't tell me your talking about sperm again! Why do you insist on that being what you always want to talk about. Oh, shit. You are a deeply closeted gay man. That's where your hostility comes from. You keep bring it up so you can hear straight guys talking about it and that's what gets you going. You take a verbal beating on here then get off your phone and then you just work your boyfriend's feet for a couple hours. You are a twink. I said that day 1. I won't judge you on that but I'm also not gonna play your fantasy shit to work you up for your dudes feet pleasures. I'm not gonna fall for anymore sperm talk either. Ask @KrakenAttackin that dudes been screaming for your attention for days now. He could and would probably be better at keeping your secret too. I don't care enough about you to keep that secret. If you profile picture is right, it looks like you probably beat the shit out of a twink or two on the weekends because you haven't been able to embrace your sexuality. You and @KrakenAttacken could practice all you want and the shit he says I can just tell he will eat your asshole. He talks that much dumb shit you can just tell he loves it and loves getting pretty badly beat by black men after he does it and you love beating up twinks. You guys probably know each other off this sit don't you. You two found love on Grindr or something?
- +1 y
@Fuentes you stupid dumb shit. I can't even take you serious because what you wrote. why are you even wanting to enter this. But I'll attempt to learn you something. Google translate doesn't correct your punctuation, it's for translation purposes. They may have even taught that in school or did you not finish school. If you did and too many words confuses you that bad, you need to go back. Maybe next time, slugger. You'll get em.
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin
I think this simp fag, Dan-something, said something to you. I got like three notifications he replied. But I don't think he realizes no one is reading or cares about him. What a fuckin' Milhouse. - +1 y
@dantheman1118 what are you talking about reject. You're writing paragraphs of nonsense and WALLS of words. You clearly didn't go to school of you think anyone is going to read your rants or delusions.
Do not self project onto me you type like a fob which leads everyone here to believe your a confused foreigner who misinterprets the English language. Just look no spaces in anything and just long walls like you suffer from sort of dyslexic tick. Look at you go self projecting all over the place, you use grindr, you like black men and more. This is as simple as rubber and glue.
Most Helpful Opinions
+1 yPretty much, I wouldn't say ALL women but many of them have a price and those are the kind of women doing this. I wish it would just get eliminated already, all it does is breed promiscuous women and horrible behavior towards women (although, to be fair, guys who watch pxrn are usually just horny.)
85 Reply- +1 y
Yes!
- +1 y
I agree! Both sides are to blame! "Women" who do that and "men" who pay for it. Also thanks for not saying that men who do watch porn (free one, not paying) are not "sick", "perverts", "disgusting" or whatever else people would say.
- +1 y
@YourFavoriteFriend imagine a bank loans a poor guy more than they should. He can't pay it back. Interest on tbe loan suffocates him. The bank takes half his paycheck for the rest of his life.
Blaming horny men for paying $5 is like blaming that poor guy. Its the bank who is the predator. - +1 y
@RandomGuy1032 I don't know. I get the analogy but still not the best example. We are all grown-ups in this world. There are really not "predators" in my eyes. There are exceptions to this rule but in the case of OF, nobody will try to fool you and steel your money. They deal is clear from both sides.
The women getting paid for doing so are obviously OK with being objectified.
I'm actually surprised that OnlyFans can maintain itself, unless I'm missing out on a whole lot of something.
I've never paid for any type of porn. As the joke goes, "Who pays for porn?"
As far as I know, 'free porn" is paid for by ads, with the participants getting their initial cut, then the producers and distributors continue to profit with each view. That's more or less how I understand it to work. Correct me if I'm mistaken.
Am I actually missing out on something?
I'm still not going to pay for it.
00 Reply
735 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic. That's actually a really good point. But the same thing applies to prostitutes/escorts as well. If there's money involved or something that will get them advancement, women will definitely be okay with inappropriate sexual behavior. Even on the job, like sleeping with supervisors and managers to climb higher, I've seen that more than once. If it's a regular male co-worker trying to sleep with her, she'll complain to HR and get him fired, but if there were to be some kind of money or deal involved in it, she will definitely sleep with him.
00 Reply
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
30Opinion
Kind of. In my observation, so much of women's behavior boils down to who is in control. If a woman feels like she isn't in control over something she should be (her sexuality), most women will feel pretty frustrated about that. She's going to want to play both sides of the coin whenever she can
Feminine sexuality has value, and women don't want to ever feel like their sexuality has lost value.
20 Reply
+1 yI think they're fine with it if they get paid... most of the time. I tried to make an onlyfans page. I figured why not get paid and just record myself working out? For reference: https://onlyfans.com/d_bone_steak
The won't let me verify... I used my I. D... my military I. D., and my passport. I'm not what they want. I might try chaturbate up and see if I can get an account and I don't care if it's mostly a bunch of gay guys jerking off to me lifting weights and giving me money... they're giving me money and I'm not shoving shit in my ass or jerking off on camera. With that said I think it's a slippery slope. Here is my point on that -->
Belle Delphine... was making how much when she just teased the idea of doing porn? Then she went and did full on porn. Who really cares about her now? Her fame fell off a cliff. Don't slide down that slope is all I'm saying.
With all that said... a woman is on the same sexual level as me without having to hit the weights 1 1/2 hours a day. Go on any of the sites I've already named and you'll find big fat out of shape ones fucking their pussies with all sorts of shit and begging for your change like a homeless bum. If they didn't like it, then why do it. I think it's just easy income if they have the ideas to make it happen. You're average chick is just going to lose more than she gains from it though.
00 Reply598 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic. It proves that some women are. Because of course some women are. But a lot of women are not and it is a problem to assume that because some women want that, all women must therefore want it.
By analogy, if there was a really good artist out there and you loved looking at their art, it doesn't make any sense to then assume because you and many others want to heap high praise on the artist for doing a thing a lot of people value that everyone should want to be an artist. In fact this isn't an analogy but a precise description.346 Reply- +1 y
- +1 y
@normalice Simp!
- +1 y
Well, we are talking about the women who DO that. Not EVERY woman in the planet. Of course not everyone wants that. But the ones objectifying themselves definitively don't have a problem as long as it profits them.
- +1 y
We? Are y'all sharing an account, then?
But if that's truly all you were asking then I answered what you were after in the first paragraph. And yet, you imaginary abuse victims have dragged out 12 extra comments after that so clearly that was not what you were asking. You were asking for permission to objectify all women by default. - +1 y
OMG YOU ARE RIGHT!!! I do like objectifying women! I also like to abuse them and treating them like shit and with no respect! Using them like they are toys when having sex! And of course I love to change them like clothes and have multiple at the time!!! You got me!
- +1 y
@normalice Would it kill you to be entertaining?
- +1 y
@normalice You're giving that clusterfuck of feds and normies far too much credit.
- +1 y
It's not really credit so much as blame. And as far as ability, a cluster fuck indeed, but you throw billions of dollars into an industry with one directive (get republicans elected) and you're going to draw some top talent. And the far righ fake news certainly does have that. Shapiro. Rogan. Carlson. Patel. Even Trump himself. These are experts at manipulation. Stupid in all other walks of life but what good is any other skill if you have the skill of simply being able to tell people to do all those things for you?
- +1 y
If I were to offer a suggestion to the right - a sort of treaty, I suppose - it would be if civil war between us ever does truly break out again, this time we both agree to stand aside while we murder each others propagandists first, and then wait a month to see if we're still in the mood.
- +1 y
@normalice "Liberals have weapons for actual practical protection instead of as a safety blanket to wave around when you're scared"
Libs straight up want to ban guns. - +1 y
@Ryfyle this guy lives in a 🤡 🌎 and it's sad he thinks Liberals would actually fight in a civil war. Just by the fact that liberals are the first people in line whenever police are hosting gun buy back programs lolol! But yeah they have weapons and they wanna fight although they wanna give away their weapons and abolish 2A. This man doesn't go outside.
- +1 y
I understand you people think you want political violence above all else and it is true for us it is more of a last resort, but "the libs won't put up a fight" is what y'all thought last time. I wonder if right wing misinformation told the confederacy the north wanted to ban guns, too. It makes sense if you wanted someone to kill and die to protect your money that you would just tell them their opponents aren't armed. Weird that anyone is or was dumb enough to believe it, though 🤭
- +1 y
"Wrong doing" because women constantly scream about being "objectified", but they regularly self-objectify for personal profit and advance. Men are exhausted by the core hypocrisy that is female.
- +1 y
They aren't in a union. This might be difficult to wrap your head around, but women who self objectify are different women than the ones don't want to be objectified. And not only are they different women but they also disagree with each other in many other ways besides this. Everyone you hate isn't united - indeed if they were you would not have a fraction of the power you have - so stop feigning bafflement over inconsistencies that can only be apparent if you subscribe to some childish "everyone is the same" cartoon version of reality.
- +1 y
@normalice More word does not make one more right. If you can't cut whatever the fuck your babbling about in one or two sentences, you wasting time.
+1 yThat's the way I see it and I'm a female myself. Women don't like being called street workers or prostitutes anymore.. They want to be called escorts.. It's just a fancy name for the same thing.. Even the slang that they use in rap, "it ain't tricking if you got it". A trick is a nicer way of saying whore.. So, I guess those women just want things to be softer and sugarcoated to not hurt their egos and feelings. LOL but it's really all the same thing.. They will always support it with, "my bills are being paid" or "I'm not getting paid to do this, I receive donations" things like that is what I've heard.
I honestly think it's disgusting. Why not make an honest living the right way?
51 Reply- +1 y
It's even worse than that. We got whores literally being half-assed, lazy E-whores, selling their soul, reputation, and dignity, and STILL thinking people should respect them for it! I know the younger generation doesn't get it, but that's kinda the whole point of sex work; sell your soul for some quick cash. You don't get to "keep your soul" and still get the cash; that's not how this works. No one owes a nasty, disgusting, self-degrading whore respect, when she doesn't even respect herself. But that's what these useless skanks want nowadays; they want to de-stigmatize sex work.
And it's not even sex work! There is literally no sex, nor work, involved, but it's just as bad, if not worse. These loser men are paying hundreds of dollars a month to these pathetic e-whores when they'd literally be better off just going to an actual real escort for $200 an hour, and getting actual sex! OnlyFans is barely even "porn." Porn requires actual work involved. It's just Instagram behind a paywall. These men are getting content that is quite literally less adult and graphic than actual porn! That's what people don't get. There's so many YouTube videos exposing OF and how sh*tty the content on there is. At least Instagram is free. That's why I, as a guy, can't even understand why so many of these simps exist. Instagram has basically the same content they're paying for, and porn is actually more graphic than what they're paying for. It's bonkers!
But yeah, I really wish there more women were still like you.
- 808 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic.
+1 yNo. Because not all women use Onlyfans. The ones that do use it and then cry about it. Those are women I find very hilarious and are trying to get people to take them seriously who never will.
But many women aren’t okay with being objectified. In fact onlyfans also hurts men too. Because it’s also exploiting men. Don’t get me wrong. The men who use these services choose to do so. They’re degenerates too.
But. No. Just because some women use only fans. Doesn’t mean all women are okay with being objectified.
30 Reply 862 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic. THAT and the fact that MEN are so stupid and retarded as SIMPS they validate these women to keep doing it by throwing tons of money at them. When they can literally see the same thing for free. Not even Kim Kardashian had to sale her sex tape we all saw it for free and she rose to fake fame with it.
But these dumb ass men will still pay.
416 Reply- +1 y
@MCheetah hahahhaa I would not doubt it was still alive it says theirs a person who blocked me in here by the guys side so I would even be surprised and very true men allowing women like that to cuck them with both genders & call it sharing. And keep throwing money at women you can literally see for free hahaha
- +1 y
@MCheetah Truth!
- +1 y
- +1 y
So I’ve asked this question before but I never get an answer. If it’s bad for a guy to be an alpha, Chad, beta or simp etc. then what’s the term for an acceptable gentleman?
- +1 y
@whirled_up_girl "Gentleman" existed when females were "ladies". Being a gentleman to a 304 makes him a Simp. A man should only be a gentleman with other gentleman and women who have EARNED gentlemanly treatment.
- +1 y
@KrakenAttackin Oh I see, I just wondered if there was a specific redpill term for how a guy should be since all those other terms seemed rather disparaging. So it's okay for a man to be a gentleman if it's by a women who deserves to be treated that way, got it.
- +1 y
Spot on. "Simp Nation" is real and disgusting.
- +1 y
@whirled_up_girl Exactly right. Women have the power to turn men into gentleman. All a woman has to do is not be a whore and to embrace her feminine side.
- +1 y
- +1 y
@whirled_up_girl
Basically, what @KrakenAttackin said. Give respect to those who are respectful and have earned it, and don't waste it on people who are not respectful and haven't earned it.
Men should treat both respect and their money the same way; work hard for it and don't give it out to anyone like it's candy on Halloween.


"Objectification" if men enjoy it for free, "empowerment" if men suffer and/or have to pay for it. Now you know. 30 ReplyYou know what? Yeah, I think so. If you don't wanna be looked at as an object of lust and desires, then stop showing your pussy, tits, and ass to the whole world. But they're not gonna stop. They're gonna be the same stupid ass bitches who go, "Oh noo, I don't want men to look at me that way, I want something real" while recording a cam video or some shit 5 hours later. These types of women make me sick to my stomach, especially because these are the types of women who contributed to my life going to shit when I was in high school. They were stupid whores who wanted to spread their legs and get knocked up over and over again and couldn't just leave me alone and had to throw me into the whirlwinds of their retarded man craving tendencies, and caused me to be abused by some piece of shit. So I have no sympathy for these kind of women. If they wanna go out and ruin their reputation, then awesome. But they better keep other people out of it.
10 Reply
+1 yYour a funny Guy @KrakenAttackin
You need to get Laid ASAP 🚨all you think about is sex, females, And Simps get only fans do something go out and meet a Girl Your dying to Bang some Chick in the back of a Van.
Females don’t want just money and to be Used Some females do and It’s great 😊 but Other females are looking For A relationship.19 Reply- +1 y
Ok buddy 😂
- +1 y
Nah I’d Rather have you Slap me.
- +1 y
I’m good too Far away And I got better things to do with my life than go to California you Would lose The Fight if we Fought. I can Break your hand and other bones with Ease.
- +1 y
@Fuentes The only bone @BigschlongEnergy could break is his tail bone from getting a schlong shoved up his keester.
+1 yAbsolutely! Amouranth said it herself:
"If you were constantly get hit on and get catcalled, at least get a profit from it"
Of course, I'm not fine with people bothering women 24/7 and "catcalling" them. But at the same time, objectifying yourself for profit has to be one of the most hypocritical moves in the human history! No respect for these "humans"!
20 Reply- 1.3K opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic.
+1 ySure, because they are willingly uploading that content. Men, and perhaps some other women, continuously pay to view the content. This weird, symbiotic relationship is the only reason that websites like OnlyFans exist.
39 Reply- +1 y
@musicbrain5 men wanting to view porn is weird?
- +1 y
@Vegasrunner When there’s tons of free porn elsewhere on the Internet, why would anyone pay to simp to these thots on OnlyFans?
- +1 y
- +1 y
@musicbrain5 Proably looking for a NSA connections. How does onlyfans work?
- +1 y
@Vegasrunner Basically content creators charge a monthly subscription fee to people who want to follow them for exclusive content, photos, videos, live streams etc. You can charge whatever you want. There’s a lot of women on there using it to post sexual content of themselves and such, and charging an exorbitant amount of money each month for guys to see it. And they whip out their credit cards month after month.
- +1 y
@musicbrain5 By definition it can't be exorbitant if customers are willing to pay. Sounds like harmless NSA entertainment. Lot of men don't want to deal w/ the day to day drama of women but they still want attention. Sounds like an easy compromise and a win win for both customer and creator.
- +1 y
@Vegasrunner You’re absolutely right. But the point of the question is why women who use OnlyFans are okay with being objectified. It’s because they’re initiating it and charging money.
- +1 y
@musicbrain5 Most women are ok w/ being objectified when it benifits them, that why we have beauty parents, wet T-shirt contest and bikini beer commercials. I was replying to you directly and you asked "why would anyone simp to these thots on OF" Or did you forget you asked that question?
- +1 y
@Vegasrunner I gotcha, apologies for the misunderstanding.
596 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic. Don't be daft.
That's like saying "Does the popularity of boxing, prove men and women are OK with being beaten and howled at, even in public, as long as they are being paid?"
You've failed the fifth rule of philosophy, kiddo. i. e Argumentum ad populum.
00 Reply- 802 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic.
+1 yI don't think the women on OF consider themselves as being objectified. They are viewing it as a fairly simple and safe way of making money: Post nude videos and pictures of yourself online and have horny guys pay for the privilege of seeing you.
02 Reply- +1 y
But they do. So many OF women are liberal/feminists. They will unironically consider it "objectification" if ugly/unattractive men look at them on the street for free, but will consider it "empowering" if ugly/unattractive men look at them on the internet for free. You're applying WAY TOO MUCH logic and rational thinking here to women that don't have it.
Does the exitance of male porn starts mean that men are okay being objectified as long as they are getting paid?
Does the existence of sugar daddies mean that men are okay with being used as a wallet?
Are you familiar with the concept of consent? If not, that is very concerning..
01 ReplyInternet wrecked adult entertainment industry I already never enjoyed it but there was almost a shred off dignity when you had to go buy a naughty dvd from a store there was actually supposed to be censorship and people were supposed to get I'D. The internet you can pass off as anyone shitty age to even be a playboy star. 10/10 wouldn't reccomend. There's a reason for Muslims probabblyy being dressed head to toe our ancestors weren't dumb they came from a time b4 god.
00 Reply
+1 yI've said it for years all women are wheres it's just a matter of figuring out thier price.
21 Reply- +1 y
For many women their price seems to be $4.95/month.
I do think so, yes. Then they try to make it sound like some empowerment whatever.
20 ReplyIt only proves the ones who do it don’t mind as long as they’re getting paid. It doesn’t prove that all women have a price. I wouldn’t do it no matter how much I got offered.
21 Reply- +1 y
@Jess_D Women pretty much objectify men as much as men do women, it’s kind of human nature to do so, although we only ever seem to hear about it when men do it. It’s true that both men and women seek being objectified too with things like ‘Only Fans’ etc, which I imagine girls use and seek objectification way more than guys do 😆 but all this being said, no one deserves to be ‘objectified’ just because these people and these websites exist like you said. I too would never put myself out there to be ‘objectified’, not that I’d get any subscribers anyway! 😂
430 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic. Yea girls like to act like hos as long as they a paid for it.
20 Reply741 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic. Yeah but I thought we already knew this. The difference is that some women are for the streets (every guy) and some women can limit it to 1 man. We call the second type "keepers"
20 Reply584 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic. everyone has a price limit on what they think is worth doing whether that limit is $10 or $10 trillion. as the old saying goes, money talks, bullshit walks
00 Reply
+1 yi think women have realized that they're going to be objectified regardless for literally ANYTHING they do or have so why not get paid for it?
15 Reply- +1 y
Huh? So you fight degeneracy with degeneracy? LISTEN! I heard a friend telling me about what a women said. To everyone reading this, this are NOT my words but a woman's words. Again, not MY words! Also, TRIGGER WARNING. The following will make people rage!
So this woman said the following:
"Kids get r*ped, so they may enjoy it as well"
This reminded me A LOT about what you are saying. Know, not the best analogy but very similar way of thinking. I hope you can now see how scary the way you think is and in which paths it can lead you. Good luck and take care! - +1 y
i never said that i would do onlyfans or that i have an onlyfans account. but what i said reminds true. men have owned women’s sexuality for years and exploited women’s bodies for years through strip clubs, porn, etc. all of that has been owned by men with men receiving majority of the profits. women literally get sexualizes for anything and everything at any age. so no, i don’t think it’s bad that now women are in control of their sexualities and bodies and are making a direct profit from it. funny how onlyfans is being seen as so bad and immoral but this same energy was not and has not ever been directed towards male owned businesses and concepts where women are being exploited for the benefit of men. it’s only a problem now because women are in control of their image and make direct profit from it. so you guys can keep crying.
- +1 y
@sassy_receptor
You must have a REALLY high opinion of yourself, if you think you, let alone most women, are really that attractive. Jesus Christ, the arrogance!
"Objectification" isn't even a real thing; it's retarded bullsh*t feminists came up with. Or else you yourself would be asexual. If you've ever had a sexual or lustful thought towards anyone, then you've "objectified" them, according to the feminist definition of it. That's what you're doing; shaming sexuality. I guess you're not one of those "sex positive feminists," huh? - +1 y
objectification is a very real thing and if it weren’t women wouldn’t be getting assaulted harassed and rape at the average age of 12. denial isn’t a good look.
- +1 y
regardless, no one is shaming anything. i just think it’s wonderful women are now directly profiting off their objectification. it’s a win win situation. male buys content, woman makes money off of loser who buys the content. so go them!
+1 y
Someone needs to alert the media!
00 Reply716 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic. I don't think any woman wants to be treated as an object. How each woman would define being treated as an object though is different. Some women don't mind men seeing them in bikinis some women do.
00 Reply- 2.7K opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic.
u +1 yIt proves only that a very small percentage of women are okay with being paid to be ogled.
10 Reply It proves that the women who appear on sites like that are.
13 Reply- +1 y
Just stop.
- 1.4K opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic.
+1 yWomen in general, no. The immense majority of women won't expose their naked bodies to strangers for money.
15 Reply- +1 y
Most do it for free.
- +1 y
I doubt it. I visited that site out of curiosity to see what's about, if you don't pay you don't get to see them naked and they do sexual videos for you.
- +1 y
Look at all the free porn.
- +1 y
Porn are hookers being paid to have sex on camera. Most women aren't hookers.
OnlyFans is mostly used by a lot of strippers and hookers too. - +1 y
Most women trade sex for resources, they just don't do it as publicly.
Anonymous(18-24)+1 yWhat are men boxers and wrestlers objectified for?
01 Reply- +1 y
Being tough and able to fight. Do you think these men get angry at people who think they are tough who don't pay them?
Yes of course, women get paid for just looking great, then complain about being objectified!!!
00 ReplyI think it varies from person to person. Obviously, some girls don't mind it. Nothing wrong with that.
00 ReplyI have asked this time and time again and no one answers - What is onlyfans?
00 Reply1.2K opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic. Yes, at least for the women that use Onlyfans.
20 ReplyNot every women is on OF its not like Instagram is it? I do t think I know anyone on Only fan, unless they’re not saying but I don’t think it’s very common…
05 Reply- +1 y
Instagram is a gateway drug to OF. An attention whore is an attention whore, the difference is can she monetize her attention whoring.
- +1 y
Yeah yeah it’s just like prostitution, has always existed, except now it’s much easier for women to get huge amounts for doing a few things in front of a camera, I wouldn’t do it myself (or maybe like for one night as a fantasy…. As you said, the ‘objectification…) but to be fair the women making loads of money are probably quite good cause I don’t think any random girl would get that much or just very short term it’s mostly a desperate situation for girls with no future etc the average girl will not be famous and make millions…
- +1 y
@CA4444
Literally ANY "random girl" can make $500 to $1,000 a month on OnlyFans. Why do you think so many 4s and 5s choose to do it? The thing is, these women complain and think that's "not enough" just because some women like Amouranth make $2 million A MONTH on there, and they think their $500 extra a month for doing next to f*cking NOTHING "isn't fair." So the average girl not making "millions of dollars" is irrelevant. She's still making $100 an hour by being a lazy, entitled e-whore who sells her dignity and self-respect to a bunch of losers online, but still thinks she's entitled to respect from non-simps anyway. Sex work is shamed for a reason, just like scams and street crime are for men. - +1 y
@MCheetah really 🤔🤔🤔 yeah I’ve heard men say similar things but how do you even know how much they make? And the ones who don’t make a lot out of it will never brag about it obviously… That’s a lot of money 500 to 1000. I still think it’s a minority of women, if all women were doing that it would completely dilute the ‘market’ and no one would make money so it’s more about very limited supply vs large demand. I think it proves women are quite good really because we could be doing that and make a lot of money so easily but we don’t 😇😀🤷♀️ (again the majority) I’m teasing you guys a little bit ;)
- +1 y
@CA4444
There are websites that report how much they make on there. Even some GAG users have done OF (and most of them I don't respect in the slightest). One GAG user I know said she made more money than that, but "got sick of it/bored with it" because her users would only stay for two months, and she didn't feel like making new content for new users every two months.
And the market isn't diluted yet, but it's fastly approaching there. And when the OF bubble DOES burst, no, none of these nasty whores get to "re-enter proper society" after selling their soul for some quick ass-cash. They will forever be labeled whores, especially the ones who have kids and have tarnished their children's reputations as well, and made them a target for bullying at school with everyone knowing their mom is a whore who sells her ass for $9.99 a month.
I mean, damn, even if I was a woman, I'd think my reputation was worth WAY more than $9.99 a month. But in reality, I'd never do that kind of work, even for a woman. Especially since women (wrongly) think they have it worse in society and that "it's harder to be a woman than a man." If that was even remotely true, OF wouldn't even exist for every 4 out of 10 lazy female to simp men off of.
And yes, you're right. That IS one good thing about OF I hadn't thought of. The women who DON'T sell their soul, will have less competition with other women in the workforce now.
- 332 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic.
+1 y9 simps and 6 feminist voted no so far, are you surprised? absolutely not.
10 Reply That is if objectification is a real thing.
10 Reply- 1.7K opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic.
+1 yYeah for those women it’s fine when it suits them
00 Reply
+1 yObviously it does. Any other conclusion is a lie.
00 Reply- 659 opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic.
+1 yWomen are ok with being objectified just in general even without pay.
00 Reply I think it proves that SOME women are. The way the question is worded, it asks about ALL women.
00 Reply- 1K opinions shared on Girl's Behavior topic.
+1 yYou hit the nail on the head.
31 Reply- +1 y
Aw some worthless piece of shit downvoted me but didn't have the courage to comment, how cute.
+1 yNot all...
01 Reply- +1 y
I mean that not all woman use OF, so only the ones who do use it, some who don't use it aren't OK with that. :)
s +1 yno it does not.
00 Reply
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Holidays
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 






Most Helpful Opinions