
Are Muscular Girls Physically Appealing/Attractive in Your Opinion?

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
As a muscular female, I sure hope there are people out there that think we look somewhat attractive!
In my experience, it seems to be a "hit or miss." Either people think they're gorgeous, or ugly. Apparently some (ignorant) people think women with muscles are "masculine." Nonsense really. Ironically, it's mostly women that hate on me saying, "Don't get too muscular or you'll look like a man!" 🙄
Now when I say I'm muscular, I don't mean I'm bulging with muscles, I'm tone and lean; think an athletic figure.
Yes, I have biceps, and my legs are quite tone from running and squats: I worked my ass off to get this figure and I'm quite proud of said muscles! However, I didn't do it to impress anyone; I did it because I like being strong and sexy.
I'm gonna go with yes because I'm pretty athletic looking and think I look way more attractive when looking physically fit not to mention that it feels like an achievement to me because it takes a lot of dedication to look that way and well worth it also! It's never to good to over do it though to the point you look like a guy not to mention that I think men would find it way more attractive than someone that doesn't look physically fit. It's basically the same as a guy that looks physically fit and healthy looking. I think most of us women like a guy that looks fit because it shows that he cares about his health and is dedicated.


A bit of tone is fine. If she has the body typical of a dancer, gymnast, volleyball player, swimmer, that's fine. She'll be strong, but won't normally look "built." I posted pics of some real-world female competitors here - again, these girls are strong and likely have core muscles like steel, but they aren't body builders.

Overly-muscled, like body builders, is masculine and not attractive to most men, including myself, though some still find it attractive. I'm not even a fan of the body-builder look in men, but it's a total turn-off in women for me.
I prefer those type of girls
Opinion
90Opinion
I would not go as far to say muscular but, skinny and fit, these girls are pretty darn attractive




this girl in the picture yes, personally i think women like gina Carano ronda Rousey the bella twins and most women in the WWE are active.
if were talking the massive body builder type for me no do it depends on the muscularity ( we're talking female Versions of Arnold Schwarzenegger at this prime)
i hope that answers your question
P. S
also well be seeing gina pretty soon again mu guess is by the end or beginning of next year, personally i hope she producers and stars in an action Fantasy adventure type them Fantasy adventure type them but thats up to her and ben shapiro personally i would love for them to do another kingdom. by Andrew Klavan but thats just me
The woman in the photo up there, yeah for sure. Once people get into like body building and start to look like a bunch of oiled up, leathered conch shells, then I'll probably pass... Although i Still don't give that much of a shit. Guess She at least has a hobby. That said, tall women prefer to date Men who are taller, fat women prefer to date Men who are fatter and muscular women prefer to date Men who are more muscular. And I'm pretty fit, But like women aren't looking for healthy, lean, fit muscular usually, But rather just LARGE mountain man muscular.
YES
that's the primary reason why I even work out b/c maybe if you look like them you can have them : )

I also like big boobs
How much muscle are we talking
This?



Or This?

There's something in between the first two where I would draw a fine line and wouldn't date. The first 3 pics in your ex are the most attractive to me personally
Yes it can be.
obviously with all things you can go to extremes.
however yes, dated girls that have done body building and gymnastics and let’s not forget dancers, who are just amazingly fit and flexible.
Nothing wrong with muscular girls but I feel like once you’re at that point you may get addicted to the shape and think you may need to do more. It’s all a balance. I would say the same for women who wants butt implants etc. Do what you like but don’t over do it to the point it becomes an obsession and you no longer look like your original self.
It really depends on the muscle definition. I work out, but I'm not bodybuilder huge. But I do like a girl who works out.
The biggest turn off for me is extreme definition in the upper body. If she is bigger than me, or has considerable mass in shoulders, arms and chest like a dude, then it would be a turn off for me personally.
Muscular legs is more tolerable.
The woman in your pic is my limit. Anything more than that, I wouldn't date
Depends how ripped she is. I prefer the girl not to be ripped.


Second doesn't look like any muscle at all.
No. Not at all.
In fact it's quite the opposite, if they are looking more "butch" than feminine.
But it's important they draw the line between being "fit" and overdoing it. Guys want a girl who has charm, personality and is good to look at and at heart.
Yes it is very appealing and sexy. From my experience as a bodybuilder in the past it takes a lot of discipline not only the workouts but the nutrition it's not as easy as one might think. I was involved with this for a little over 3 years. And I had seen quite a few women that were also dedicated to the lifestyle and yes they had incredible physics some might think that it's not feminine but I do as long as they don't go as far as looking like the men.


first girl is too much for me. Middle is fine. last girl is nice.
Abs'olutely, the dedication is always attractive, but even i agree there's a limit. Too much bulk can be bad for the body, but to work on pink muscle instead of red is best, as it strengthens the base muscles and is easier on the body. For example, martial artists rely on pink muscle more than red allowing for great strength in a slimmer form
There is a reason women naturally have a higher percentage of body fat and less muscle mass than men. And also that most men aren't attracted to women with muscles. It's not naturally attractive. To me it seems like being with a man, and since I am not homosexual, I don't find it attractive.
I like a woman who is fit, but also soft. I'll bring the hardware. I need her to bring the software.
I find it appealing, because of the work they put in it, it's impressive
Well it depends on the definition doesn't it. A fit, healthy, athletic woman with a bit of muscle tone is really attractive, a little bit more muscle still ok but once you get into competitive bodybuilding territory, it's too much and I don't find that attractive.
Muscular girls looks more like men than female
so basically ur asking me if I prefer woman to look more like men?
basically your asking am I gay?
nah lol, anyone who’s a straight male would prefer his girl to look less masculine/ muscular
There are healthy muscles and there are gross muscles. Women need a nice soft layer on their muscles in order to look "right" but I like the "runner body" on women, strong toned legs with at least a little bit of an hourglass. Upper body strength is great, so long as it's not bulging.
Sorry selected wrong option. I would go for option 3. For me its overall. Being muscular is not no no for me. So what if she is muscular. She is still a girl. How does she look like overall. Is she a nice person kind person. What does she look like even with muscles. She may look extremely fit.
Yes. Their body is art. Their hardwork and dedication is something for which i have nothing but love and respect for.
If she has feminine proportions and a feminine face that's fine. If she has a jawline OR chest OR butt like a male athlete, no thanks.
It really depends how muscular, plus what part (s) of the body
Yes, just as long as they're not ripped. There's this girl I fucked once. She was a little more than toned. She had an athletic build from when she played softball. I thought it was incredibly sexy.
I have been a gym rat all my life and my wife was the first girl I ever saw with a six pack.
Objectively very much. It only adds to my attraction
My family has been called “solid.” Not muscular looking just nice and healthy. People are surprised at my strength though. My dad is that way too. Doesn’t look really strong but wow he certainly is.
I like the bodies of those who use them a lot, but not to build up “show” muscles. I like ballerinas, ice skaters, gymnasts, and others like them.
That woman is not even muscular. She’s toned. Toned is always good but bulky is not attractive. I’m sure most men will agree.
yeah just as long as we are not talking about this type of muscular
Yes I think we are. Not if taken to the extreme though.
Girls that work out but not bodybuilders or powerlifters
Depends on definition. Lean and athletic, or muscles like a man/bodybuilder. 1st one sure could be attractive. 2nd option hard NO. Thats like a man
They definitely can be.. As long as they keep enough fat for it to look feminine and not look like they are on all types of juices..
Unless she has an amazing face to make the body matter less, then a muscular woman is substantially less appealing.
I want a cute powerlifter girl. No roids shit though. She gotta be full natty brah.
As long as they aren’t trying to look like men, I find them very attractive. As long as they are trying to look like athletic women not compete in the heavy weight division of Mr. Olympia
Someone who keeps themselves in shape is attractive on its on. Someone who values her wellbeing in the form of working out is attractive. Just (to me) someone who is roided out or overly muscular is not.
It depends on the muscular definition.
A little bit isn't bad.
Short muscular women who also have some pudgyness are my ideal women.
I’m short and I gain muscle quickly if I work out everyday in my arms but I don't know never had abs
It dont matter to me, as long as we both treat each other good. Looks come second
If she's small boobs and decent ass, I suppose she can be...
As long as the muscles in a relaxed state are not bulging or the veins sticking out. I can live with that.
Ripped girls are not attractive to me but girl who have a bit muscular legs, arms and somewhat visible abs can be attractive to me
Yes. And most men would agree in a blind test.
People have a skewed perception of what "muscular girl" actually looks like because of Miss Olympia
Well
Like not extremely attractive. But it's not a big deal. Still if girl is stronger than guy she dates - for a boyfriend it might be a bit emasculating.
I think for most guys that'd come down to how muscular the women were.
as long as the woman dont look like Dwayne Johnson aka "THE ROCK"
Athletically fit? Yes!
Weightlifting buff? No...
It depends on the extent of her muscularity. Generally I like a more feminine physique though.
Yes, but there is a threshold when muscle mass goes beyond healthy fitness
Prefer toned women just nicely delineated muscles, not overly muscular.
Well for starters the woman in that photo is not muscular. She is just fit and athletic. Which is sexy obviously.
Visible or bulky muscles are a turn off.
Lower back that is strong/can move gracefully is attractive. But not muscular.
They can be in a lot of cases so long as its not overdone. Well defined and toned muscles can be very attractive.
Fit, yes. Big bulky muscles, no. Women do not naturally develop that way.
If its a little bit its attractive anything more is completely unattractive.
@bannacookies I don't find muscular girls physically attractive because I value her mental stability & pleasant demeanor.
I want a mascular girl to dominate me wearing heels and trampling my body. That's my desire.
I'd say a bit less muscular than the girl in the pic
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions