Guess which side was the one giving covid disinformation?

At the time nobody knew what rate percent would survive. Thousands of old people died...

The name itself "sars covid" was intended to strike FEAR s. a. rs=S'EVERE A'CUTE , like really? Severe? And also acute? In the name! for something over 90% will survive, like flu?

Now that it is too late, for the millions poisoned by covid vax, that might trigger several cancerous growths... they finally announced what they meant by "severe and ACUTE"... just mild... in pictures.

1,

Guess which side was the one giving covid disinformation?

"Most got mild," but the name given by "medical professionals or doctors or scientists " was sars! As above to SCARE people to "consent" but only based on "science giving disinformation", NOT informed consent!

nobody said "it will be mild unless you are age 70 or older!" Did they? Not until 2024 in picture.

2, Similarly,

Vaccine was less than 98% effective but 98% healed
Vaccine was less than 98% effective but 98% healed

Almost everyone recovers same as common cold so...

now ask yourself, why were they trying to "contain" a disease that THEY knew, almost everyone was recovering like common cold, and...

for "most confirmed cases was mild" and why are they double naming a mild one as above "severe and acute" the s. a. in sars?

Guess which side was the one giving covid disinformation?
Post Opinion