If marriage is so bad for women why are they the ones that encourage marriage?

[Vegasrunner]

Updates

+1 y

Jumpin toadstool Now you want others to provide you sources as well. This highlights more entitlement.

Updates

+1 y

@jump in to toadstool As you mentioned something isn't considered true simply because you feel it is

[Jumpintoadstool]

Same reason most people have kids without thinking it through. Societal expectations. We are faith from a young age that you are supposed to go to school, get a job, get married, buy a house, have kids, retire and then die. Most people dont put that much thought into it.

[Jumpintoadstool]

Faith was supposed to be taught. I don't know why my phone autocorrected that. My bad.

[Vegasrunner]

@jumpintoadstool A lot of that has to do w/ the fact that women make their decisions based on emotion.

[Jumpintoadstool]

Studies show that women are no more emotional than men are. Thats a myth. Women are just more expressive and communicate their feelings.

[Vegasrunner]

@jumpintoadstool Pretty impossible to have a study about an intangible concept, however antedoctal, and historical evidence would refute that.

[Jumpintoadstool]

Feel free to look it up. Facts dont care about your feelings.

[Vegasrunner]

@jumpintoadstool Then why are you sharing your feelings?

[Jumpintoadstool]

These are peer reviewed studies. Feelings have nothing to do with it.

[Vegasrunner]

@jumpintoadstool What metric was used to define emption?

[Jumpintoadstool]

Google is free. See for yourself.

[Vegasrunner]

@jumpintoadstool Google a hypothetical study? Thanks for validating my point, you didn't like how information made u feel so you feel so you reacted emotionally creating a false narrative to help you cope.

[Jumpintoadstool]

That's a lot of words for, "i can't operate a search engine, so I'll just project and dismiss the facts to make myself feel better".

[Jumpintoadstool]

"A recent study from Scientific Reports looks at sex and ovarian hormones' influences on volatility, emotional inertia, and cyclicity. For 75 days, the team followed 142 men and women to observe their regular emotions. One group of the women were naturally cycling, while the other three groups of women took oral contraceptives. At the studies end, they found little variation between men and womens emotionality"
Its not letting me post the link, but the study is on nature. com I'm sure if you really try hard to use that big boy brain of yours, you can figure it out for yourself.

[Vegasrunner]

@jumpintoadstool It's unfortunate thar reading is difficult for you, however I'm glad I was finally able to train you to recognize your emotional POV. Good girl.

[Vegasrunner]

@jumpintoadstool That's cute however it doesn't ask the question asked. What is the tangible metric used to measure emotion?

[Jumpintoadstool]

That's projection. If you had even a thied grade level of reading comprehension, you would notice i wrote how to find the study for yourself. Quit being lazy. I'm not doing anymore legwork for you, especially after that sexist comment.

[Jumpintoadstool]

Oh please, quit pretending men are some emotionless robots. Some of the most emotionally inept people on the planet have been men. Ever seen a man punch a hole in a wall? Throw a controller? Anger is an emotion. Lets not kid ourselves.

[Vegasrunner]

@jumpintoadstool I'm supposed to spend my time looking up a hypothetical study regarding a hypothetical metric created by you?

[Vegasrunner]

@jumpintoadstool I don't think you're kidding yourself, like most women you're simply controlled by your emotion so you're esmxpressing what you feel vs what is real, it's pretty standard.

[Jumpintoadstool]

Whatever helps you keep up that delusion of superiority, champ. Peer reviwed studies say differently. Facts don't care about your feelings. Goodnight 🙂

[Jumpintoadstool]

Its not a hypothetical study. I told you what website to visit. I can't post links here. You hVe given the tools. If you are too lazy to do the legwork, thats on you.

[Vegasrunner]

@jumpintoadstool Peer reviewed studies about I tangible topics that you can't produce? If you had some actually facts perhaps your statement would be less ironic.

[Vegasrunner]

@jumpintoadstool Lol, I need to do leg work about your made up study?

[Jumpintoadstool]

Well I can't link it, so yes. Looks like you do need to do some work. I think you'll manage. I told you where to find it.

[Vegasrunner]

@jumpintoadstool TY but I think my time is much better spent living in reality, bit it's cute that you're willing to argue about a nonexistent study, kinda validates my statement about women and their emotions.

[Jumpintoadstool]

You know, saying something doesn't magically make it true. You can keep living in fantasy land and ignore the facts i presented to you. Thats your own intellectual laziness and its your right to do so. I gave you the tools you need to seek out the truth, you have chosen. not to and instead use fallacious arguments and misogynistic ad hominems. We see you. 😘 have a nice day, buddy.

[Jumpintoadstool]

Side note, if its an intangible concept, that same argument can be used to dismiss your statement that women are more emotional than men and irrational by nature. Your own argument falls apart. Think your argument through a little better next time.

[Vegasrunner]

@jumpintoadstool Lol, a hypothetical study about an intangible emotion that you can't find constitutes a fact? I don't mean to be rude, but I hope you get the help you need.

[Vegasrunner]

@jumpintoadstool I'm glad you agree emotion is an intangible concept, however my position is that there are no metrics to measure it, so a "study" would be impossible. That does not mean that women do not exhibit emotional tendencies, as you are proving. TY.

[Jumpintoadstool]

False. Misrepresenting the argument is a strawman. Do try to argue without fallacies. It does not bode well on the strength of your argument. My point was, if what you said were true (ot isn't) you can't say for certain that women are more emotional. You would be relying purely on anecdotes, and this is an incredibly weak foundation for an argument about half the worlds population. Sweeping generalizations are foolish and... dare I say... emotional? Someone disagreeing with you isn't being unreasonable, and having emotions behind those arguments doesn't make it automatically incorrect. People got wmotional when fighting for civil rights. There were protestors who cried and spoke with deep conviction. So this argument once again, falls flat. Again, you can't claim the study is not possible if you refuse to even attempt to read it in the first place. You were given the information to find it, you chose not to use it. As for emotional tendencies, what do you call breaking things? Punching holes in walls? Etc. Men have emotional tendencies as well. You can't acknowledge one without the other.

[Jumpintoadstool]

The study is not hypothetical. It exists, and is available once you decide to open your browser and type the information I gave you. I can see your cognitive dissonance won't allow for you to pull your head out of the sand, so I think for the sake of not wasting any more of either of our time, I'll just go ahead and disengage now. ✌️

[Vegasrunner]

@jumpintoadstool I wouldn't categorize your argument as a strawman one as it seems as your argument is information hurts your feelings so its not true. I do agree that antedoctal evidence is not a foundation for a sound argument, however that validates my point as women routinely use antedoctal experiences as evidence. Generalizations would be the opposite of emotion as they are used to make everything from political to business decisions. I do understand your confusion now, civil rights is logical not emotional, I'm fact one could make the argument that u believing that fighting for basic human rights is emotional makes you emotional. It is impossible to read a nonexistent study and having a study about an intangible metric is impossible. When did you last punch a hole in the wall?

[Vegasrunner]

@jumpintoadstool As you mentioned simply claiming something exsist does not make it so, the fact that you are unable to articulate the metric used to measure makes it even more unrealistic.

[Jumpintoadstool]

You would see the metric if you used the info I gave you and looked at the study 🙃

[Jumpintoadstool]

"Women routine use anecdotal evidence" source? Anecdotal evidence. you're a joke.

[Jumpintoadstool]

Study is not nonexistent pal. You would know that if you learned how to use a search engine.

[Jumpintoadstool]

There is rationality and emotion behind most arguments. My point is, you discrediting an argument on the basis that the person making rhe argument is experiencing emotion is a ridiculous notion. Check mate. I will be blocking you now. I can only take so much stupidity from one person. Get some help.

[Lliam]

@jumpintoadstool. I read this entire thread. Vegasrunner is a case study in emotional damage and denial.
All of your arguments were solid. Vegasrunner is just a lonely troll.
He doesn't like women. Fine. Let him drink himself to death.

[Jumpintoadstool]

@Lliam thank you. It was like talking to a brick wall. I don't know why i bother.

[Lliam]

@jumpintoadstool. Yeah, he did the same with me. I like your initial opinion, by the way.

I can totally get behind a rational discussion, but this guy isn't rational.

I don't know why people like him go to sites like this to seek affirmation for their twisted attitudes and then spend hours obfuscating, attacking, denying, using fallacious and circular arguments. They aren't informing anyone. It's as if they have a pathetic need to be heard; to justify their existence; prove to themselves that they are dominant and that it's normal to have a hollow soul.

[Drewtate]

They get a whole wedding where all their family, friends and even enemies get to see them looking special and in the spotlight for a day, along with a honeymoon. Then if she divorces she is guaranteed by law to get half plus child support until the youngest is 18 and then alimony.

[Lliam]

Who said that marriage is bad for women? It's not if they don't accidentally marry ass holes.

[Vegasrunner]

@Lliam So you're saying marriage has more benifits for women?

[Lliam]

@Vegasrunner. I didn't say that. Marriage can be a win-win for both if people choose the right partners and are committed to the relationship.

[Vegasrunner]

@Lliam The questions is what can be, it's addresses what is. If you're advocating it then that means you see a benifit in it.

[Lliam]

@Vegasrunner. I definitely see benefit in marriage. I've been happily married for 26 years.

[Vegasrunner]

@Lliam You're a female?

[Lliam]

No. I'm married to one.
Are you mentally handicapped?

[Vegasrunner]

@Lliam Apparently you are or at least illiterate the questions asked about the benifit for marriage, why would your situation even be relevant?

[Lliam]

Apparently you're trying to prove something by making up riddles.
I don't care about your pathetic agenda. I'm outa here.

[Vegasrunner]

@Lliam That is probably for the best as you are only making yourself appear incompetent by your response.

[Lliam]

Okay, Vegaswhiner. You're an example of someone who would make a woman regret marriage.

[Vegasrunner]

@Lliam Seeing as how I would never get married I don't think that's an issue. If I can bang a different chick every night why would I even consider marriage?

[Vegasrunner]

Lliam TY for reading That's an interesting POV. So you believe that a fictional study on a intangible metric is a solid argument. Out of curiosity how many women have you slept with?

[Lliam]

Why do you call it a fictional study when you refuse to read the link she provided, yet you claim expertise based on anecdote? Seems like her evidence is more solid than yours.

12. 6 long term girlfriends, my wife, and 5 others, not counting BJs. I preferred exclusive, infatuated relationships over hook ups and one night stands.

[Vegasrunner]

@Lliam Not only did she ne er provide a link she open admits that she didn't provide a link so not sure what you read. She literally only provided her feelings as evidence. OK so you're pretty inexperienced, that makes sense considering the position you hold.

[Lliam]

I'm inexperienced? How many long term relationships have you been in? How many years have you been married? Just because you have fucked a lot of women and used them for cum dumps doesn't qualify you as an expert on the question you asked. You have no idea what you're talking about.

Jumpintoadstool quoted part of the text from a recent study from Scientific Reports and said "Its not letting me post the link, but the study is on nature. com". I suppose she made that up. But you characterize it as a "hypothetical" study.

It took me two minutes to find the study she referred to:
www.ibtimes.com/are-women-more-emotional-men-not-really-study-finds-3324258

You're an insufferable ass. No wonder you can only manage one night stands.

[Vegasrunner]

@Lliam Yes you are inexperienced. You've only been w/ 12 women in your life. How many men do you think the avg 23 yro woman has bee. W/? I've been in a relationship w/ at least one woman for over 25 years, not to mention sleeping w/ nearly 300 and negotiating with 10's of thousands as a Vegas nightlife host so I would be consider an expert on this subject. I don't know if she made up a study I only know that she failed to present it, the fact that you found it only validates why women need men to help them think logically.

[Lliam]

I see what's happening. You're a sociopath who has lived a life of debauchery. You are contemptible and your life is meaningless. Now you spend your idle hours fucking with unsuspecting people on-line. I fell for it. Haha Joke's on me. But now you can go back to your pointless existence.

[Anonymous]

You need to get out more. That is not always the case at all.

[Vegasrunner]

@anonymous So your saying women shouldn't get married?

[slatyb]

They are indoctrinated by the patriarchy from a young age.

[Anonymous]

Because they get alimony payments out of it.