The odds of actually even being able to successfully "drop" them is unlikely because there are many anti-nuclear weapons in modern defense systems.
If I actually ever had them then I would rather decommission all of them and convert them to be reuseable energy like backup emergency power generators or uninterruptible power supplies, especially for use in a private bunker just in case when and if a real nuclear apocalypse were to occur. At least then I would hope I'd still have electricity and heat to keep me comfy after the rest of the world had gone to shit.
Although I thought about keeping one active in case it was a zombie apocalypse as I would rather just die in a nuclear blast than having to struggle to survive a zombie apocalypse as I find that to be much worse and difficult to deal with than a nuclear apocalypse. It's not so much the zombies themselves but having to put up with other human survivors that are bound to screw you over and constantly fighting each other over resources. If you ever watched The Walking Dead, well you'll see and get what I mean. There's always the trust issues and you are taking your chances with whom you follow and trust in a zombie apocalypse.
So I don't know, maybe I'd keep the last one active in case of a zombie apocalypse. But if a nuclear apocalypse had already occurred and I survived somehow in my own little private bunker, then I probably won't need it anymore, since at that point a zombie apocalypse is unlikely to happen and I'd just decommission it and convert it to another emergency power generator like the other two.
Most Helpful Opinions
What kind of nuke?
you have tactical nukes which are only strong enough to destroy a mountain or so and the nuclear radiation isn't to bad.
Then you have full fledged nuclear bombs capable of taking out entire cities and states.
So which kind do we have?
I only need one nuclear weapon, but let's see what I'd do with three.
I would drop the first one on Mecca. Destroy the land they worship so there's nothing left to worship. Sure you'll disappoint all of the non-violent Muslims out there, but it will get rid of all of your terrorist permanently.
The second one would go to North Korea because those communist bastards have one of the worst dictator regimes the world has seen in a while. I watched a girl on the news talking about how she got out of North Korea by going into sex slavery in China--this was an upgrade--and if a country is so horrible that girls will sell themselves into slavery to get out of it, that country has to go.
I guess my last nuclear weapon would go to Russia if they hadn't gotten scared by me blasting off the first two. If they agreed to make a treaty, I'd send it to Africa. With all of the Aids and Ebola they have there and the general lack of health of their standard population, maybe the remaining survivors would be able to start over with the whole disease thing.
No thanks! It does nothing productive. Just causes more harm and destruction. Plus I don't want to be a murderer.
I don't want to be the cause of the death of many. No thank you.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
26Opinion
Nowhere? Nukes aren' the answerr to problems. They onlycause greater problems.
Right now, I wouldn't drop them anywhere. They just kill innocent people. A gun with three bullets would be better I think, because it's usually people with power who cause the most harm.
I would however use them to directly protect myself and people I care about, if I knew for a fact that it would save meSome top-ranking military bunkers in South Korea. We should help the Dear Leader make Best Korea take over the entire peninsula.
I'd leave the safety pins in there and drop them on the parking of the company that destroyed the surplus of nukes at the end of the Cold War :D
That looks like a better idea that create one of these artificial flamy mushrooms!in the gutter. because i can't kill any innocent human beings
OK I have three Nukes, first will go to Washington, second will go to Israel, third will go to Iraq where the highest ISIS concentration is.
Do I look like a mass murderer? Innocent people live in every one of those places.
Three Tsar nukes are overkill. Its more likely to destroy the world with them.
if the nuke can only explode one person, Bashar's butthole.
I wouldn't want to kill any people, so, I wouldn't use them.
No where.
I'd leave them in their current location.I wouldn't want to drop them. If I had to choose, I'd pick Iran, Syria, and Saudi Arabia.
I'd keep them and use them to make my enemies fear me.
Gathering of the Juggalos
The biggest Nascar event
The Bilderberg group annual meetingIran and China, then save the last one for whoever messes with US next.
No where I would hide 1 in a vegas casino 1 in the apple factory and 1 in the main oil shipping facility in the middle east then make the world pay me trillions of dollars to disarm them lol jk
Keep them pointing at the sky in case of an alien invasion.
Can I change nukes with changing governments in some countries? 😂
Both poles and ill save the last one in case the people revolt my rule
All of em on Syria.. 😎
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions