How is a girl kicking a guy in the balls so hard he collapses any better than a guy punching a girl in the stomach?

[Anonymous]

How is doing that for the same reason more acceptable?
How is that more of a joke?

[EclipseoftheHeart]

That is not quite even, he would have to give her a cunt punt to make the kicks even. I don't know how it came about, but a guy getting kicked in the balls has been a joke in movies and even TV Shows. Comedians like it too as it always gets a laugh. Yet do they ever have a girl showing her get kicked in her nads? No, and this ball kicking fad should be toned down. A guy can get ruptured and be talking in a high voice the rest of his life so it is definitely no joke.

[Asker]

No, actually the punch in the stomach is more similar, because there are organs in there that can be permanently damaged.
A kick in the vagina must be more like a kick in the penis. Still hurts, but there's no comparison.

And if it is no joke, why are you making it sound like one? He could be talking in a high voice for the rest of his life? Seriously? And there used to be men hittin women in movies too, way back. People thought that this was funny too. Only difference is, THAT changed.

[EclipseoftheHeart]

Talking in a high voice after having your balls damaged is real from what I heard. But maybe it is if you are a kid before puberty and your voice never changes. So no, it is no joke. Some guys have to have testicles removed from them being ruptured by a well placed kick.

[markscott]

Eclip: A fair comparison would be if a girl could be kicked in the ovaries, outside the body.

[EclipseoftheHeart]

@markscott I don't think the ovaries would be quite as painful. But I have never been kicked in any of these areas so haven't experienced any of that kind of pain.

[markscott]

Eclipse: I mentioned ovaries, because they are the analogus part to balls. However, as balls are on the outside, they likely have many more pain receptors for protection, compared to the ovaries. So, you are likely correct.

[MlleCake]

Uh, it isn't really better or worse. If there's reason it was necessary, then there was. If it wasn't necessary it wasn't. Simple as that.

[Asker]

And you mean if it wasn't necessary, it's equally bad?
And if it was necessary, it's equally "ok"?

[MlleCake]

Exactly.

[Asker]

I agree fully. Thank you!

[MlleCake]

But, here's my question. When and where is all this ball kicking happen? I can only remember a couple times in my youth where I witnessed it out in the wild.

Otherwise anytime I have ever seen it happen it was in a video where it was set-up beforehand. Or it was a guy with a fetish who requested it.

On the other hand, I have seen many women who have been beaten all to shit by men. I have known literally hundreds of battered women in my life. I'm sure some battered men too, but they don't always make it known.

[Asker]

And how often have you seen beaten women or girls being treated like a joke? How often have you seen men or boys make girls or women collapse in pain in public, as if it was the most normal thing to do, without any sense of shame, or as if it was remotely wrong?
When have you ever witnessed severe violence towards a member of your gender, and everyone just lauhed or didn't care, and there were absolutely no consequences for the guy who did it?

What do you mean, you have only seen it "a couple of times" in your youth? How often have you seen boys beat the shit out of girls, and there were no consequences for them, and all that happened was that the girls got laughed at, shamed, and if they cried, laughed at more?

Isn't a couple of times already a lot? And don't fucking pretend like women suffer more abuse and violence in this world. That is just ridiculous.

[Asker]

I don't care how much or how many. I care about the morality behind it. About the difference in value we put on people based on their gender.

If we laugh or do nothing when we see a girl make a boy collapse in pain, but are shocked when a guy does it to a girl, that shows that the boy is less WORTH.

What does this have to do with the overall numbers?

[MlleCake]

Ok, so first of all, please don't deflect. Answer the questions.

Second of all you are fuck stupid if you don't realize how much men get away with violence towards women. Certainly not in every case, and sometimes there is punishment but not significant punishment. And we do more than just joke with these women. We tell them to shut up and go home and stop being a woman a man has to hit. That is a pervasive underlying message to woman all over the world.

I'm not saying it is not awful for men to experience random violence. It is awful. I am trying to drill down to why you feel the need to keep weigh the relative badness of one experience over another. It's NOT a contest.

Violence does negative things to the human mind and body. It just does, it always does, and it does in every case. Ball crunching and punches in the stomach are both bad enough to be called bad.

So now start from saying "ball crunching" when there is no self defense reason for it is bad. How do we deal with discouraging it, and with making a joke out of it? That is actually the question that will get you somewhere.

I don't know if you're the same guy who is always asking variations on this same question. It's on here A LOT. And what I always experience with these guys/or you is that you're just spinning your wheels with an obsessive thought that you have no logical perspective on. And many of the times it's obvious the question is just ruse to get women to talk about ball busting so you can get excited about your fetish and jack off. (By the way, that's a very non-consensual, wrong thing to do, and we wish men would stop expecting women to be free fetish dispensing machines.)

[Asker]

I'm not talking about the ones who don't get caught or can't be proven to be guilty. I am talking about people's varying moral sense and emotional reaction when WITNESSING violence, depending on the victims gender.

And YOU'RE the one making a contest out of it. YOU asked about violence against women, as if I was somehow downplaying violence against women, or like I'm supposed to not care about violence against men, as long as there is a "bigger" problem with violence against women.
Or like I was saying that only women are violent towards men, and men not against women.
YOU were comparing it to the hundreds of women you've seen battered, and said that there were only a few men. YOU'RE making a competition out of it.

And I'm not a fucking fetishist. My mother is an alcoholic abusive cunt, and I'm paranoid, emotionally afraid of the entire female gender and have castration anxiety.

And again, so maybe you get it: I'm not afraid of violence. I find the REACTION people have to it, when the victim is male, deeply disturbing and disheartening. I could get over any injury. What I can not get over is that people don't seem to perceive violence with the same outcome against men or boy as the same violation of VALUE as against girls or women.

And as many things and problems there come with being female, that I don't know like you do, this is ONE thing YOU can't possibly know.

[Asker]

And measured by the standards we apply to WOMEN AND GIRLS, witnessing this kind of violence a couple of times IS a lot. And I bet my ass that people did not react REMOTELY as shocked or appalled, or even barely phased by it, as they would have if the victim was female. Maybe they didn't react at all. Maybe they LAUGHED.

Because it is not even SEEN as abuse. And you wonder why there are fewer men coming out about being abused?
You have to abuse a man WAY harder for him to actually feel like he can claim being abused.

And even then he'll be a joke if he does.

Your fucking " only a couple of times " comment annoys me so fucking much. HOW often have you seen a guy punch a girl in the stomach so hard she collapsed? Probably never. This is already a remarkable difference.
But now imagine you DID witness it. Can you imagine people reacting like they do to a guy getting kicked in the nuts by a girl? Not in a million years.

[MlleCake]

Dude, stop defelcting. You are not this unclear about what I am saying.

Cop to your motives or STFU. I have no more patience for this non-stop usesless dickaround.

[MrMansonsPocketPssy]

Why are there so many of these questions?
xx
~ Mrs Manson

[mrbobz]

It's not but traditionally such things were a reverse on gender expectations. A man slapping a woman would be expected in say a 50s film, so by the 70s and 80s the reverse of a woman kicking the shit out of a man is the opposite of expectation and so was seen as amusing. Relics of those times are still around and so is the message

[Asker]

But why do they put that in animation movies for kids? Or in movies for people who didn't experience that time?

[mrbobz]

I would check how old the content is. Things have moved very quickly in even the last 10 years. If it's recent then I guess that "relic" of what is acceptable still exists. It will change, go watch any 70s and 80s comedy movie and you see more boobs than actor's

[markscott]

Actually, kicking him real hard in the balls would likely do more damage than punching a girl in the stomach. That's because the balls are just hanging there, with nothing to protect them, while the abdomen has fat and muscle protecting what's inside.

[AmourHoney]

Getting kicked in the stomach can cause internal bleeding if the force is hard enough.

[Asker]

@AmourHoney
Right, just like kicking a guy in the balls can

[AmourHoney]

Yeah, so both can do serious damage.

[Asker]

@AmourHoney
... only that the balls are, as markscott said, not protected by muscles, fat and a ribcage.

[AmourHoney]

And? how do you think internal bleeding is caused?

[Asker]

@AmourHoney
Sorry, went a little defensive there

[AmourHoney]

It’s fine. But I just wanted to step in with that aha, my cousin is an ER nurse and has dealt with plenty of internal bleeds from fights so I just wanted to put that point out there

[Asker]

@AmourHoney
Yes, you're right... an injury is an injury and assault is assault

[AmourHoney]

Yep exactly

[AmourHoney]

Even though the stomach has more protection, with the amount of organs cramped up inside, a hard hit can cause some serious damage.

[markscott]

@AmourHoney : Of course a kick in the abdomen can cause serious, even fatal damage. But the same amount of force used to kick the abdomen, and used to kick the balls, would usually cause more damage to the balls, due to their not having a fat or muscle covering for protection.

[AmourHoney]

like I said, both can do serious damage. it’s not a competition lol

[SkipStop]

Double standards, gynocentrism, misandry. I don't care what society says. If I'm attacked, I have the right to defend myself and shove a finger in her pu$$y while she's dry.

[Billie_]

Because girls are seen as the weaker sex so if a man can’t handle pain from a girl then he is weak.

[Asker]

Are you retarded? "Pain from a girl"? What the fuck does this even mean? It's his BALLS that hurt! Because they are organs! What the fuck does this have to do with strong or weak?

What does this have to do with who has more muscle mass? How does feeling pain make you weak?

[Billie_]

Dude I’m not agreeing with it I’m saying how society sees it which is what this question was asking.

[Asker]

And why is a person worth less when they are stronger? Why is assault against them more acceptable, even if it has the same outcome?

[Asker]

Oh ok I'm sorry

[WindowLicker]

It's not, it's a dangerous assault that can have serious health consequences for a guy. If a girl kicks a guy in the balls I believe it is his right to elbow smash her in the face.

[Tyliah]

* punches windowlickers ball*

[WindowLicker]

@Tyliah *kicks @Tyliah in the pee hole*

[Tyliah]

How rude 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

[WindowLicker]

@Tyliah Sorry 😭

[Tyliah]

I forgive you. Now like my pee so it feels better

[SirRexington]

They are equally horrible. Depending on the reason for the assault.

[Asker]

What do you mean depending on the reason?
Let's assume the reason was the same in both cases.
Let's assume their partner cheated.

[SirRexington]

Then I can understand the action. Should they do it? No. But I can see the justification for the action.

[Asker]

And you think it's equally bad?

[Asker]

and equally understandable

[SirRexington]

I'd say so.

[Asker]

We're on the same page then.

[genericname85]

clearly cause we're living in a misogynist patriarchy ;)

[Anonymous]

I wish you guys would give it a rest with these ‘kicked in the balls’ questions

[Asker]

Noone is forcing you to even click them

[MyExperience]

Who says that’s better?

[CuriousMufuxka]

Is this some kind of abortion thing?