Would you say past age 30 or 35 is the very worryingly risky age for adults to want children, especially for women and their fertility?

[Anonymous]

Yes

No

Depends

Others

[Avicenna]

It depends on the woman. My kids are all healthy, and they were born to women who were 34, 36, 39 and almost 45. Getting them pregnant was easy.

At 30, the vast majority of women should still be very fertile, and I'd be pretty confident for most women at 35.

[Dargil]

There are some risks of birth defects but it won't stop me either.

[jahaims]

It gets more risky with age but 30-35 isn't very extreme

[Anonymous]

40 is the standard safe age nowadays. 20 is best if you want to keep your body, 30 is best if you want a stable family.

[Anemone978]

Depends.. why is it always dudes asking this question? you should be looking into your own fertility..

[Asker]

Not to say that men never run into possible fertility risks but waiting out on having children factually/biologically is more of a risk with older women.

[Anemone978]

It is a risk for both.. the only thing different is men do not get menopause.. So even in old age yous can still spit out your decrepit sperm LOL

[Apple1996]

Nah I'd say 40+ starts getting risky for both genders

[Kingofkings1992]

No, I actually believe that’s the ideal time to be having kids. I think you are much more mature and fit for being a parent at 35 than you are 25.

[dolemite58]

past 35 for women is risky, the chance of complications skyrockets.

[Anonymous]

No, I hear its 40 and older.