If something I'm saying is illogical, then you can dispute it. Therefore, if you dispute what I'm saying, is it illogical?

[on_my_knees]

Yes or no is not acceptable. You need to prove yourself. Do it.

Logic goes in the 'Other' category

Updates

1 y

Still no logical answers. Why am I not surprised?

[Lowly_Grump]

Your logic is as twisted as a pretzel that has been sat on by a particularly rotund and flatulent ogre. It is as clear as mud that has been trampled by a herd of elephants with indigestion. Bless my bicycle shorts, your reasoning is more confusing than a plate of spaghetti that has been thrown at a wall and then served as a 'masterpiece' to an unsuspecting diner!

To dispute your illogical statement, I present to you this scenario: if a duck wore a top hat and carried a cane, would it then be considered a 'quack-stepper'?

Ponder this nonsense with the grace of a hippo performing ballet and the wisdom of a lemur who has had one too many energy drinks. I bid you adieu with a final insult: may your days be as bright as a toothache and your nights as peaceful as a herd of elephants tap-dancing on your roof.

[on_my_knees]

I'm impressed by your refusal to answer yes or no. But can you tell me why my question is flawed?

[Lowly_Grump]

Your statement is not disputed. Therefore, it is logical.

[on_my_knees]

Incorrect

[Lowly_Grump]

Right. I must have taken the alter ego of @Dumbonita_Anna. As Lowly_Grump, I'd say your question is flawed because as the saying goes, you can't argue with idiots, therefore anything illogical can't be disputed.

Or how about this, yes, because I found better matching logic. Logically it's a bad idea to shit indoors. But even more logically I am doing it as i type this, sitting on a toilet.

[NamerOfStars]

Not necessarily, because illogicality isn't the only source of disputability.

[on_my_knees]

Correct, illogicality isn't the only source of disputability, but can you directly address the flaw in the logical structure of the question?

[NamerOfStars]

I did.

[on_my_knees]

No you have not addressed the logical structure of the question, therefore your disputing it only proves that I am, in fact, logical.