Did you ever notice that , if you accidentally drop anything , it actually FALLS , so , refuted big bang?

[strateguy632]

We all know that stuff FALLS. We all know the explanation "the ground has mass, lots of mass and the amount of mass has equations" bla bla bla.

How can any sane person who NOTICED stuff fall, also believe the blatantly false narrative of "all the matter was together" during big bang, denser mass than earth where stuff ACTUALLY falls but...

also believe the matter spread apart! Instead of falling! That would be a miracle! And does not fit the atheist narrative.

The exception called "singularity" is just a twisted way to describe a miracle without the word "miracle."

So did you ever notice that "when you drop your keys, you refuted the model of fake history called big bang"?

[Telekinetic-Potato]

While I don't think the big bang is probably the right answer either, there's answers for everything you're saying here.

First of all, gravity isn't the only force. (Technically, we're not sure if we consider it strictly a fundamental force the same way as the others)

There's the strong force, the weak force, electromagnetic force and gravity.

These are often referred to as fields and are thought to exist because of subatomic particles which make up atoms and things like the Higgs field and so on.

The theory of the big bang says that matter was so energetic, so dense and so hot, it didn't have a chance to materialize into anything. It's hard to think about this but imagine that you couldn't have electrons or protons because the parts that make those up are zipping around so fast, their energy is greater than the force that demands the particles to come together.

It's almost like if you have two magnets and in one hand you push away but your left hand you bring closer, if you move your arms slowly when the magnets pass, they come together but if you move your arms very quickly, the magnets will not have a chance to come together.

That's what would have been happening with atoms and subatomic particles during the big bang.

That said, there's a ton of problems with the big bang and at first they were thought to be minor ones but now with string throey doing so poorly and the new Webb telescope, it's looking more and more like the big bang theory is not the best explanation for everything we see.

[strateguy632]

1, Wow, someone really worked hard to fool you.
2, Physics said protons existed at the first second of the alleged big bang.
3, The forces you listed only affect "tiny distances" like in atom.
But they hid that from you.
4, About magnets, they would need to "flip over"
5, I expected someone to say the big bang was HOT so heat expand.
Then i would tell them to compare to sun, heat and EXPLOSIONS but still fallls, not separate in flying pieces.

[strateguy632]

Also ALL 4 of those forces pull together so can't defend big bang spreading apart!

[Telekinetic-Potato]

Right, like I said. The particles were so energetic, they overcame those forces. Thats why the first short moments after the big bang there was no light. Because the quarks couldn't bind together to make photons. I explained that already.

[Telekinetic-Potato]

And no one thought it happened in the first second of the big bang. The first light is estimated to have happened a little less than 400,000 years after. Which is currently being questioned because of how far away and old the galaxies the Webb telescope is finding.

[Telekinetic-Potato]

You have to keep in mind, the theory is that all matter started at a singularity. You say tiny distances. After even the first few seconds, the scale would have been similar to the sun and Mars being practically touching. Probably even more drastic.

[Dongie]

👏👏👏👏

[Dongie]

Yeah, but they won't accept it until they see Jesus riding a horse in the air, then it's to late.

[Jennz6]

If there was a BIG BANG, GOD made it happen

[strateguy632]

That is a logical necessity and contributed to the description of GOD. 🥇👨‍🎓

[CuriousHubby]

Sures